Circadian control element gene transcriptions: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 61: Line 61:
# inverse positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.
# inverse positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.


===CCE distal promoters===
===CCE UTR promoters===
{{main|UTR promoter gene transcriptions}}
Negative strand, negative direction: CTACCCCAAC at 3804.
 
==CCE random dataset samplings==
 
# RDr0: 0.
# RDr1: 0.
# RDr2: 0.
# RDr3: 0.
# RDr4: 0.
# RDr5: 0.
# RDr6: 0.
# RDr7: 0.
# RDr8: 0.
# RDr9: 0.
# RDr0ci: 0.
# RDr1ci: 0.
# RDr2ci: 0.
# RDr3ci: 0.
# RDr4ci: 0.
# RDr5ci: 0.
# RDr6ci: 0.
# RDr7ci: 0.
# RDr8ci: 0.
# RDr9ci: 0.
 
===RDr UTRs===
{{main|UTR promoter gene transcriptions}}
 
===RDr core promoters===
{{main|Core promoter gene transcriptions}}
 
===RDr proximal promoters===
{{main|Proximal promoter gene transcriptions}}
 
===RDr distal promoters===
{{main|Distal promoter gene transcriptions}}
{{main|Distal promoter gene transcriptions}}
Negative strand, negative direction: 5'-CTACCCCAAC-3' at 3804, and complement.


==Acknowledgements==
==Acknowledgements==

Revision as of 06:04, 23 January 2022

Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Henry A. Hoff

"The circadian control element (circadian; Anderson et al., 1994) was found in 10 FvTCP genes."[1]

Consensus sequences

Circadian control elements (CAANNNNATC).[2]

Hypotheses

  1. A1BG has no CCEs in either promoter.
  2. A1BG is not transcribed by a CCE.
  3. CCE does not participate in the transcription of A1BG.

Samplings

Copying the consensus of the CCE: 5'-CAACTTTA-3' and putting the sequence in "⌘F" finds no locations between ZSCAN22 and A1BG and no locations between ZNF497 and A1BG as can be found by the computer programs.

For the Basic programs testing consensus sequence 5'-CAANNNNATC-3' (starting with SuccessablesCCE.bas) written to compare nucleotide sequences with the sequences on either the template strand (-), or coding strand (+), of the DNA, in the negative direction (-), or the positive direction (+), the programs are, are looking for, and found:

  1. negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
  2. negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
  3. positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
  4. positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CAANNNNATC-3', 0.
  5. complement, negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
  6. complement, negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
  7. complement, positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
  8. complement, positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GTTNNNNTAG-3', 0.
  9. inverse complement, negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 0.
  10. inverse complement, negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 0.
  11. inverse complement, positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 1, 5'-GATGGGGTTG-3' at 3804.
  12. inverse complement, positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-GATNNNNTTG-3', 0.
  13. inverse negative strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 1, 5'-CTACCCCAAC-3' at 3804.
  14. inverse negative strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.
  15. inverse positive strand, negative direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.
  16. inverse positive strand, positive direction, looking for 5'-CTANNNNAAC-3', 0.

CCE UTR promoters

Negative strand, negative direction: CTACCCCAAC at 3804.

CCE random dataset samplings

  1. RDr0: 0.
  2. RDr1: 0.
  3. RDr2: 0.
  4. RDr3: 0.
  5. RDr4: 0.
  6. RDr5: 0.
  7. RDr6: 0.
  8. RDr7: 0.
  9. RDr8: 0.
  10. RDr9: 0.
  11. RDr0ci: 0.
  12. RDr1ci: 0.
  13. RDr2ci: 0.
  14. RDr3ci: 0.
  15. RDr4ci: 0.
  16. RDr5ci: 0.
  17. RDr6ci: 0.
  18. RDr7ci: 0.
  19. RDr8ci: 0.
  20. RDr9ci: 0.

RDr UTRs

RDr core promoters

RDr proximal promoters

RDr distal promoters

Acknowledgements

The content on this page was first contributed by: Henry A. Hoff.

See also

References

  1. Wei Wei, Yang Hu, Meng-Yuan Cui, Yong-Tao Han, Kuan Gao, and Jia-Yue Feng (22 December 2016). "Identification and Transcript Analysis of the TCP Transcription Factors in the Diploid Woodland Strawberry Fragaria vesca". Frontiers in Plant Science. 7: 1937. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01937. PMID 28066489. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  2. Bhaskar Sharma & Joemar Taganna (12 June 2020). "Genome-wide analysis of the U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase enzyme gene family in tomato". Scientific Reports. 10 (9581). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66553-1. PMID 32533036 Check |pmid= value (help). Retrieved 27 August 2020.

External links