IDEAL Trial

Jump to navigation Jump to search

High Density Lipoprotein Microchapters

Home

Patient information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Physiology

Pathophysiology

Causes

Low HDL
High HDL

Epidemiology and Demographics

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

HDL Laboratory Test

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Clinical Trials

Landmark Trials

List of All Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

IDEAL Trial On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of IDEAL Trial

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on IDEAL Trial

CDC on IDEAL Trial

IDEAL Trial in the news

Blogs on IDEAL Trial

Directions to Hospitals Treating High density lipoprotein

Risk calculators and risk factors for IDEAL Trial

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Objective

To compare the effects of two lipid lowering strategies (high dose atorvastatin [80 mg] and simvastatin 20 mg) on the risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods

The Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) trial was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial which enrolled 8888 patients with past history of acute myocardial infarction, who were randomly assigned to treatment with high dose atorvastatin (80 mg) or simvastatin 20 mg. The primary endpoint was a major coronary event, defined as coronary death, confirmed nonfatal acute MI, or cardiac arrest with resuscitation.

Results

After a median follow-up time of 4.8 years, compared with patients in simvastatin group those in atorvastatin group were associated with:

  • Lower mean LDL-C levels (81 vs 104 mg/dL)
  • Lowered primary end point rate (9.3% vs 10.4%)
  • Lowered occurrence of any coronary event (898 vs 1059)

Conclusion

Intensive lowering of LDL-C did not result in a significant reduction in the primary outcome of major coronary events, but did reduce the risk of other composite secondary end points and nonfatal acute MI. There were no differences in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality.[1][2]

References

  1. Pedersen TR, Faergeman O, Kastelein JJ; et al. (2005). "High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial". JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association. 294 (19): 2437–45. doi:10.1001/jama.294.19.2437. PMID 16287954. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Pedersen TR, Cater NB, Faergeman O; et al. (2010). "Comparison of atorvastatin 80 mg/day versus simvastatin 20 to 40 mg/day on frequency of cardiovascular events late (five years) after acute myocardial infarction (from the Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering [IDEAL] trial)". The American Journal of Cardiology. 106 (3): 354–9. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.033. PMID 20643245. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)