ILLUMINATE Trial

Jump to navigation Jump to search

High Density Lipoprotein Microchapters

Home

Patient information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Physiology

Pathophysiology

Causes

Low HDL
High HDL

Epidemiology and Demographics

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

HDL Laboratory Test

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Clinical Trials

Landmark Trials

List of All Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

ILLUMINATE Trial On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of ILLUMINATE Trial

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on ILLUMINATE Trial

CDC on ILLUMINATE Trial

ILLUMINATE Trial in the news

Blogs on ILLUMINATE Trial

Directions to Hospitals Treating High density lipoprotein

Risk calculators and risk factors for ILLUMINATE Trial

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Objective

Raising HDL levels by a combination of torcetrapib, a CETP inhibitor, and atorvastatin, an HGM-CoA reductase inhibitor.

Timeline

Start Date

August 23, 2004

End Date

Premature Termination on December 2, 2006. Data collection continued till July 15, 2007.

Methods

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged 45-75 years who have a history of cardiovascular disease 30 days to 5 years before screening
  • Patients who have type 2 diabetes mellitus that meet criteria of the American Diabetes Association or receive anti-diabetic agents, even without previous cardiovascular disease.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unstable medical condition
  • Life expectancy less than 5 years
  • LDL-C levels < 100 mg/dL, those not receiving anti-lipidemic medications, if LDL-C target level not achieved at termination of run-in period, and those who have cardiovascular event during run-in period or uncontrolled hypertension
  • SBP>140 mmHg or DBP>90 mmHg,

Outcomes

  • Primary Outcome was defined as the time to first “cardiovascular event”.
  • “Cardiovascular event” defined as death from coronary artery disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. Procedure-related deaths and events were excluded.
  • Secondary outcome was defines as time to the first occurrence of a primary outcome. Time to death regardless of the etiology, change from baseline LDL and HDL levels.
  • Outcomes were based on 1,3,6,9, and 12 months scheduled visits.[1]

Results

  • Median follow-up: 550 days
  • Follow-up completion: 99.7% of patients
  • Early discontinuation: 11% in atorvastatin group and 13.4% in torcetrapib group
  • One year follow-up:
    • Increase of HDL (72.1%)
    • Decrease of LDL (24.9%)
    • Decrease of 9% of triglycerides among patients on torcetrapib vs. minimal change in lipid profile in atorvastatin group (p<0.001)
  • After 3 months follow-up, there was a small, but significant, change in CRP levels (p=0.01).
  • After 12 months follow-up, blood pressure decrease was 0.9% in atorvastatin group vs. 5.4 mmHg in torcetrapib group (p<0.001). Torcetrapib group also have a 0.08 mmol/L decrease in potassium, a 1.39 mmol/L increase in sodium, and a 2.28 mmol/L increase in bicarbonate vs. an increase in all 3 among the atorvastatin group with electrolyte values increasing 0.06 mmol/L, 0.78 mmol/L, and 1.93 mmol/L, respectively (p<0.001).
  • In contrast, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased 0.8 ml/min/1.73m2 in torcetrapib group, but decreased 0.3 ml/min/1.73m2 in the atorvastatin group (p<0.001)
  • QT interval changes after 12 months were 3.3 msec and 0.3 msec in torcetrapib and atorvastatin groups, respectively (p<0.001)
  • Measurements of aldosterone showed that after 3 months, there was a significant increase in aldosterone measurements in the torcetrapib group among 85th, 90th, and 95th percentile values.[1]

Study Outcomes

  • Hazard ratio for death was 1.58 in torcetrapib group at the end of the study (p=0.006).
  • Torcetrapib group had a 1.25 hazard ratio for primary outcomes (p=0.001), most notably significant for unstable angina (p=0.001) and least important for stroke (0.74).
  • Significant increase in adverse events in torcetrapib group was reported: hypertension, peripheral edema, angina pectoris, dyspnea, and headache (p<0.001 – p=0.02).[1]

Conclusion

  • There was an increased rate of death and morbidity in torcetrapib group due to an unknown mechanism.
  • Study was terminated prematurely due to results of torcetrapib pertaining to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, Grundy SM, Kastelein JJ, Komajda M; et al. (2007). "Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events". N Engl J Med. 357 (21): 2109–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706628. PMID 17984165.