ST elevation myocardial infarction glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibition
ST elevation myocardial infarction Microchapters
ST elevation myocardial infarction glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibition On the Web
Other Antiplatelet Agents Including Aspirin and Thienopyridines
There is clear data demonstrating the benefits of the antiplatelets aspirin and thienopyridenes  in the management of patients with ST elevation MI treated with fibrinolytic administration. The benefits of clopidogrel vs placebo in patients undergoing primary angioplasty have not been established in randomized trials, although non-randomized registry data is consistent with a benefit of clopidogrel in this setting. The benefit of aspirin plus thienopyridine therapy versus aspirin monotherapy alone could be difficult to establish in randomized trials given that the majority of STEMI patients are treated with a stent which in turn obviates chronic thienopyridine treatment. Despite the required chronic thienopyridine therapy following stent placement, the slower onset of action of oral thienopyridines relative to that of parenteral antiplatelet agents such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors raises important questions as to the acute / early benefits of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors versus thienopyridines. Furthermore, the optimal timing of thienopyridine therapy in primary PCI is not well established. In so far a few patients undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery urgently in the setting of STEMI, the need to define the anatomy prior to theinopyridine administration may not be as compelling as it is in the setting of stable angina, unstable angina and non-ST elevation MI.
Current guidelines recommend pre-loading with 300 to 600 mg of clopidogrel in the primary PCI setting. Again, it should be emphasized that this is not based upon randomized trial data enrolling STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, but rather from data originating from non-randomized subgroup analyses and registries. One registry demonstrated that pre-loading with clopidogrel in the setting of STEMI was associated with a 2.2 fold improvement in normal TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3 (O.R. 1.2-3.9, p=0.01) was well as a reduced risk of recurrent MI (0% vs 3.2%, respectively, p= 0.04) . In a subgroup of 2707 patients managed with primary PCI in the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACOS) registry, 1 year mortality was significantly reduced among patients treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.62]. It should be noted that this data is limited by the fact that neither the loading dose nor timing of clopidogrel were reported . It should also be realized that in registries, clopidogrel administration is often a surrogate or a marker of the use of a stent, and it is not clear whether the benefit was mediated by the stent or by the clopidogrel. Finally, Gibson et al in a substudy from CLARITY have demonstrated that non-emergent PCI after fibrinolytic therapy was associated with improved mortality among patients randomized to clopidogrel (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.92, P = .034) but not placebo (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.63-3.19, P = .40, interaction P = .028).
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are a third class of antiplatelet agents that have, in contrast to aspirin and clopidogrel, been studied extensively in the setting of STEMI treated with primary PCI. Meta analyses of randomized trial data do support a clinical event reduction (including a strong trend toward a mortality reduction) among STEMI patients treated with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors . In contrast to primary PCI, there is no clinical benefit of GPIIb/IIIa inhibition when added to the administration of a full dose of a fibrinolytic agent when co-administered at the time of presentation with STEMI. This combination is clearly associated with increased bleeding, particularly in the elderly . The benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa administration in the cardiac catheterization laboratory several hours after fibrinolytic administration is supported by non-randomized observational data .
There are several clinical questions regarding GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in the setting of STEMI that have not been definitively resolved in randomized trials:
- What is the optimal timing of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI? Is it before cardiac catheterization which may improve patency on arrival to the cardiac catheterization laboratory or is at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)?
- What is the optimal route of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI? Is it via the intravenous route early, or via the intracoronary route once the anatomy has been defined.
- What is the optimal duration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition? Longer durations of infusion may be associated with greater efficacy but also with more bleeding.
- What is the role of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI in the context of bivalirudin therapy?
- What is the role of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI in the context of more potent antiplatelet agents that may become available.
Mechanism of Benefit of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition blocks the cross-linking of fibrin strands to the platelet at the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. GPIIb/IIIa inhibition blocks the formation of new thrombus in this fashion, but high levels of inhibition have been associated with disaggregation of pre-existing clot .
Among STEMI patients, Gibson et al have demonstrated that a greater number of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors occupied is associated with improved myocardial perfusion, ST segment resolution and coronary blood flow .
Among patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction, treatment with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors has been associated with improved epicardial patency (TIMI 3 flow improves from approximately 15% to 30%) and improved myocardial perfusion on arrival to the cardiac catheterization laboratory . Despite these improved rates of flow and perfusion, the isolated use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor does not restore TIMI 3 flow in a sufficient proportion of patients to make it a viable stand alone pharmacologic strategy in the absence of adjunctive PCI. To improve the rate of normal TIMI grade 3 flow on arrival to the cardiac catheterization laboratory, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists have been combined with fibrinolytic agents. Despite the improvement in epicardial vessel patency with the combination of these agents, clinical outcomes were not meaningfully improved  , and the combination of these agents prior to cardiac catheterization for STEMI has largely fallen out of favor.
Clinical Trial Data
Facilitated PCI Using a Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Alone in the Absence of Fibrinolytic Administration
The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors such as the small molecules tirofiban, and eptifibatide as well as the large molecule abciximab have been associated with improved outcomes in primary PCI trials  . One issue is the optimal timing of the administration of these agents: should they be administered in the emergency room prior to cardiac catheterization (which may cause a delay in transferring the patient to the cardiac catheterization laboratory), or should they be administered in the cardiac catheterization laboratory which may miss the potential benefit of opening the vessel prior to arrival in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Comparisons of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
There are few randomized trials directly comparing agents in this class. The Multicentre Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban vs. Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare Metal Stent/ in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MULTISTRATEGY) trial compared the small molecule tirofiban with the large molecule abciximab in the management of primary PCI patients . While this was a randomized trial, it was not blinded. All 745 patients were treated with 300 mg of clopidogrel prior to cardiac catheterization. There was a 2 X 2 randomization in the trial. The first level of randomization was to high dose tirofiban (25 μg/kg bolus regimen) versus abciximab, both administered at the time of first medical contact with the patient. The second level of randomization was to either sirolimus-eluting (SES) or bare metal stenting (BMS). Given that only 745 patients were enrolled, a highly powered endpoint was chosen, which was ST segment resolution at 90 minutes following PCI. ST segment resolution associated with tirofiban (85.3%) was statistically non-inferior to abciximab (83.6%)(RR, 1.020; 97.5% CI, 0.958-1.086; p<0 .001 for noninferiority). Consistent with these EKG findings of non-inferiority, there was likewise no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) for tirofiban vs abciximab at either 30 days (4.0% vs. 4.3%, respectively; p=0.85)or 8 months (9.9% vs. 12.4% respectively; p=0.30. With respect to safety, there was a significant increase in the risk of thrombocytopenia associated with abciximab (0.5% for tirofiban versus 2.4% for abciximab: 2.4%; p=0.03). The increased risk of thrombocytopenia associated with abciximab has been consistently observed across multiple trials.
In a smaller earlier trial called STRATEGY (Single High Dose Bolus Tirofiban and Sirolimus Eluting Stent vs Abciximab and Bare Metal Stent in Myocardial Infarction), the same investigators compared the outcomes among STEMI patients treated with high-dose tirofiban plus a sirolimus-eluting stent (n = 87) versus abciximab plus a bare metal stent (n = 88) . The hypothesis was that administration of tirofiban instead of abciximab would allow the expanded use of drug eluting stents by nullifying the cost differential between sirolimus-eluting vs bare-metal stents. The primary endpoint of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or binary restenosis at 8 months occurred in 19% of tirofiban patients versus 50% of abciximab patients (p<0.001).
A meta-analysis that incorporated randomized trial data from 6 trials involving 2,197 patients through Cotober 2008 indicates that there is no difference in outcomes between primary PCI patients treated with abciximab versus either high dose tirofiban (5 trials) versus eptifibatide (1 trial)  Abciximab was not associated with an improvement in either the rate of TIMI flow grade 3 post PCI (89.8% vs. 89.1%, p = 0.72) or ST-segment resolution following PCI (67.8% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.66). Likewise, abciximab was not associated with a reduction in either 30-day mortality (2.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.66) or reinfarction (1.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.88). No difference in bleeding was observed.
Facilitated PCI Trials using Tirofiban
Early upstream administration of tirofiban has been associated with better pre-PCI angiographic outcomes, but these studies were not sufficiently powered to demonstrate significant clinical benefit. The benefit of early administration of tirofiban compared to upstream administration was assessed in the TIGER-PA trial (TIrofiban Given in the Emergency Room before Primary Angioplasty). This study consisted of 100 patients who received tirofiban either in the ER or in the cath lab. There was a significant improvement in the initial angiographic parameters such as TIMI flow grade (TFG), corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG). This study was not powered to demonstrate a significant clinical benefit .
Likewise, the investigators from the On-TIME trial (Ongoing Tirofiban in myocardial infarction Evaluation) evaluated a similar strategy of administration of tirofiban approximately one hour before PCI compared to administration of tirofiban in the cath lab . The primary endpoint of TIMI grade 3 flow pre-PCI was not increased with the use of early tirofiban (19% vs. 15%, p=0.22), but TIMI grade 2 and 3 flow combined, thrombus burden and myocardial perfusion were improved. This study also was not powered to demonstrate a clinical benefit.
In contrast to the above two studies, another small trial (RAPIER) demonstrated that the upstream use of tirofiban in the ER was not associated with a significant improvement in the rate of TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow compared with the delayed administration of tirofiban in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (39% vs. 27% p >0.2). There was, however, a trend towards improved ST segment resolution in the ER group (69% vs.77%, p=0.07) .
Facilitated PCI Trials using Abciximab
The use of abciximab in the emergency room (ER) has likewise been compared to delayed administration in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The RELax-AMI study (Randomized Early versus Late abciximab in Acute Myocardial Infarction treated with primary coronary intervention) included 210 patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Of these 105 patients received abciximab in the ER and the remaining 105 received abciximab in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. This study demonstrated significant improvements in the pre-PCI angiographic parameters including TIMI grade 3 flow (24% vs. 10%, p=0.01), corrected TIMI frame count (78±30 vs. 92±21, p=0.001) and myocardial blush grade (MBG 2/3) [15% vs. 6%, p=0.02] in the early abciximab group compared to the upstream group. The post-PCI ST segment resolution (>70%) was greater in the early abciximab group (50% vs. 35%, p=0.03) and the myocardial blush grade following PCI was also improved (MBG 2/3 79% vs. 58%, p=0.001). The one month ejection fraction was significantly better in the early group .
Similarly, the ERAMI trial (Early Reopro Administration in Myocardial Infarction) demonstrated significant improvements in the post PCI CTFC and increased rate of normal TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade 3 among patients who received abciximab in the ER compared to those who received it in the cath lab despite an absence of any difference in pre-PCI angiographic parameters .
Multiple other studies have demonstrated similar improvements in angiographic outcomes associated with early administration. Zorman et al demonstrated that ER administration of abciximab resulted in increased patency rates, improved ST segment resolution, and better survival compared to administration of abciximab in the cath lab . Bellandi et al demonstrated not only an increase in the rate of TIMI grade 3 flow and improved TIMI Frame Count / myocardial blush grade but also left ventricular function recovery compared to delayed abciximab administration in the cardiac catheterization laboratory . Finally, the ReoPro- BRIDGING study also demonstrated that early administration of abciximab was associated with increased patency of infarct arteries and improved myocardial perfusion .
Facilitated PCI Trials using Eptifibatide
Comparable to studies using tirofiban and abciximab, in the INTAMI study (INTegrilin in Acute Myocardial Infarction), Zeymer et al demonstrated that administration of eptifibatide in the ER was associated increased TFG 3 pre PCI compared to administration in the cath lab (34% vs. 10%, p=0.01) . But there was no difference in the TFG 3 post-PCI, death, reinfarction, stroke and major bleed up to 30 days.
The TITAN TIMI-34 (Time to Integrilin Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction) was a larger trial than the INTAMI trial consisting of a total of 343 STEMI patients of which 180 received eptifibatide in the ER compared to 163 who received the drug in the cath lab. The primary endpoint, pre PCI corrected TIMI frame count was significantly better in the ER group compared to the cath lab group (77.5±32.2 vs. 84.3±30.7, p=0.049). The pre PCI TMPG 3 was more frequently seen in the ER group (24% vs. 14%, p=0.026). However there was no difference in the bleeding events and clinical outcomes between the two groups .
Facilitated PCI Trials Combining Low Dose Fibrinolytic Agent and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor
Given the discrepancies in the outcomes in facilitated PCI using fibrinolytic alone and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor alone, a strategy of combined therapy using low dose fibrinolytic and full dose glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was examined. The Strategies for Patency Enhancement in the Emergency Department (SPEED-GUSTO-4 Pilot trial) examined the benefit of administration of fibrinolytic with or without abciximab among patients undergoing early PCI following an acute MI. This non randomized study demonstrated that administration of a half-dose reteplase and abciximab was safe and effective. This strategy was associated with TIMI flow grade 3 in 86% of cases at 90 minutes and the composite end point of death, reinfarction and urgent revascularization occurred in 5.6% of cases in the PCI group compared to 16% in those who did not undergo PCI.
The Alteplase and Tirofiban in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ATAMI), a small single center study demonstrated that there was significantly high rates of TIMI grade 2/3 flow among STEMI patients randomized to combination therapy with 50mg alteplase and tirofiban prior to planned PCI compared to upstream administration of tirofiban in the catheter laboratory (87% vs. 42%, p<0.0001). These groups were compared with a matched control patients who underwent PCI with provisional abciximab in the cath lab (29% of patients had TIMI flow grade 2/3). The 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the combination therapy group compared to upstream tirofiban group and the control group (0.7% vs. 5.5%, p<0.02 vs. 6.3%). There were no differences in the incidence of bleeding events between the three groups. This study has its limitations given the fact that this was a single center study with relatively small number of patients and a lower dose of tirofiban was used (10μg/kg).
Contrary to the SPEED and the ATAMI studies, the BRAVE (Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation) study by Kastrati and coworkers was an open label, randomized multi-center study in which the beneficial effect of the use of half dose reteplase and abciximab on the infarct size using single photon emission tomography (SPECT) was examined. The investigators did not demonstrate any improvement in the final infarct size using the combination therapy (n=125) compared to abciximab alone (n=128) among STEMI patients referred for PCI (mean difference in the infarct size was 1.3% between the two groups). There was no difference in the secondary endpoints such as death, reinfarction or stroke . A similar strategy was examined in APAMIT (Asia Pacific Myocardial Infarction Trial) where all STEMI patients received abciximab and were randomized to either immediate PCI or to PCI sixty minutes later following the administration of alteplase. Like all previous studies this study demonstrated that facilitation with a lytic in addition to abciximab was associated with an increase TFG 3 pre PCI but no difference in the clinical outcomes.
Given the small sample size in the above studies, another randomized study, the ADVANCE-MI (ADressing the Value of facilitated Angioplasty after Combination therapy or Eptifibatide monotherapy in acute Myocardial Infarction) study was designed to answer similar questions whether a strategy of combination fibrinolytic and a different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (eptifibatide) compared to eptifibatide + placebo prior to PCI would improve clinical outcomes. Although this study originally planned to recruit 5640 patients, it was prematurely terminated because of slow recruitment. An analysis of a total of 148 patients suggested that combination therapy (reduced dose tenecteplase and eptifibatide) was associated with improved epicardial flow and myocardial tissue perfusion on pre-PCI angiography. This strategy however resulted in a trend towards an increase in adverse outcomes (death, new/worsening heart failure or bleeding) compared to eptifibatide + placebo group.
The FINESSE trial (the largest trial on combination therapy) results were presented in the European Society of Cardiology meetings in 2007 (www.escardio.org). The Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) study is a 3000-patient, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of early administration of reduced-dose reteplase and abciximab combination therapy or abciximab alone followed by PCI with abciximab alone administered just before PCI for acute STEMI. Patients were randomized to one of the two facilitated PCI treatments or primary PCI in a 1:1:1 fashion. At 90 days, there were no differences between treatment arms for the primary composite end points of the trial: all-cause mortality, readmission for heart failure, ventricular fibrillation, or cardiogenic shock [10.7% (PCI only group, n=806) vs. 10.5% (abciximab facilitated group, n=818) vs. 9.8% (reteplase and abciximab group, n=828)]. There were also no differences in all-cause mortality (4.5% vs. 5.5% vs. 5.2% respectively), complications of MI (8.9% vs. 7.5% vs. 7.4%), or any of the independent components of the primary composite end point. For safety end points, rates of TIMI major bleeding and minor bleeding were significantly higher for the abciximab/lytic facilitated PCI strategy as compared with primary PCI (14.5% vs. 6.9%, p<0.001). There was also a strong trend towards increased intracranial hemorrhage through discharge or day seven in the combined abciximab/lytic facilitation approach.
More recently, although not truly a facilitated PCI study, the CARESS-in-AMI (Combined Abciximab Reteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction) study determined whether early transfer for PCI following pharmacotherapy administration improves outcomes compared to a conservative watchful waiting approach among patients with STEMI with anticipated delay in primary PCI due to their presentation to a non-PCI center. Six hundred patients in this study were pretreated with aspirin, heparin, half dose reteplase and abciximab. Subsequently patients were randomized to either immediate transfer for PCI or transfer only in case of failed reperfusion or clinical deterioration. The investigators demonstrated that there was significant benefit in terms of reduction in 30-day mortality with the immediate transfer strategy (4.4% vs. 10.7%, p=0.004) without any differences in the bleeding events. It is important to note that the CARESS-in-AMI study determines whether early PCI improves pharmacotherapy outcomes. This is in contrast to the facilitated PCI strategy where pharmacotherapy is administered to improve PCI outcomes.
Use of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Rescue PCI Following Failed Fibrinolysis
In contrast to primary PCI, there is no clinical benefit of GPIIb/IIIa inhibition when added to the administration of a full dose of a fibrinolytic agent when co-administered at the time of presentation with STEMI. This combination is clearly associated with increased bleeding, particularly in the elderly . The benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa administration in the cardiac catheterization laboratory several hours after fibrinloytic administration is supported by non-randomized observational data . In a small non-randomized study of 59 consecutive patients at a single institution, death, reinfarction and urgent target vessel revascularization was significantly lower among patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibition as compared with patients who were not treated (3.4% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.01).
Side Effects and Complications of GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Abciximab has consistently been associated with the development of thrombocytopenia . In one meta-analysis, abciximab but not small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of mild thrombocytopenia when compared to placebo (4.2% vs 2.0%; P <.001; odds ratio 2.14) as well as severe thrombocytopenia as compared with placebo (1.0% vs 0.4%; P =.01; odds ratio 2.48). Thrombocytipenia has been in turn associated with an increase risk of major bleeding, transfusion, recurrent MI, stroke and both in-hosptial and 30 day mortality 
2013 Revised, 2009 and 2004 ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, (DO NOT EDIT)
Intravenous Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (DO NOT EDIT)
|Class III (No Benefit)|
|"1. Routine pre-catheterization laboratory (e.g., ambulance or emergency room) administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as part of an upstream strategy for patients with STEMI undergoing PCI is not beneficial. (Level of Evidence: B)"|
|"1. In patients undergoing primary PCI treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), it is reasonable to administer a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (abciximab, double-bolus eptifibatide, or high-bolus dose tirofiban), whether or not patients were pretreated with clopidogrel. (For glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration in patients not pretreated with clopidogrel, (Level of Evidence: A); for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration in patients pretreated with clopidogrel,(Level of Evidence: C))"|
|"1. In patients undergoing primary PCI with abciximab, it may be reasonable to administer intracoronary abciximab. (Level of Evidence: B)"|
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (DO NOT EDIT)
|"1. It is reasonable to start treatment with an intravenous glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist such as abciximab  (Level of Evidence: A) high bolus-dose tirofiban (Level of Evidence: B) or double-bolus eptifibatide  (Level of Evidence: B) at the time of primary PCI (with or without stenting or clopidogrel pretreatment) in selected patients with STEMI who are receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH)."|
|"1. The usefulness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists (as part of a preparatory pharmacological strategy for patients with STEMI before their arrival in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for angiography and PCI) is uncertain. (Level of Evidence: B) "|
Combination Therapy With Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (DO NOT EDIT) 
"1. Combination pharmacological reperfusion with abciximab and half-dose reteplase or tenecteplase should not be given to patients aged greater than 75 years because of an increased risk of ICH. (Level of Evidence: B)"
|"1. Combination pharmacological reperfusion with abciximab and half-dose reteplase or tenecteplase may be considered for prevention of reinfarction (Level of Evidence: A) and other complications of STEMI in selected patients: anterior location of MI, age less than 75 years, and no risk factors for bleeding. In two clinical trials of combination reperfusion, the prevention of reinfarction did not translate into a survival benefit at either 30 days or 1 year. (Level of Evidence: B)"|
|"2. Combination pharmacological reperfusion with abciximab and half-dose reteplase or tenecteplase may be considered for prevention of reinfarction and other complications of STEMI in selected patients: anterior location of MI, age less than 75 years, and no risk factors for bleeding in whom an early referral for angiography and PCI (i.e., facilitated PCI) is planned. (Level of Evidence: C)"|
- The 2004 ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction 
- 2013 Revised ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- ↑ (August 1988) "Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group". Lancet 2 (8607): 349–60. PMID 2899772. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, Xie JX, Pan HC, Peto R, Collins R, Liu LS (November 2005). "Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial". Lancet 366 (9497): 1607–21. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67660-X. PMID 16271642. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Lev EI, Kornowski R, Vaknin-Assa H, Brosh D, Fuchs S, Battler A, Assali A.. Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(4):435-9.
- ↑ Zeymer U, Gitt AK, Jünger C, Heer T, et al. Effect of clopidogrel on 1-year mortality in hospital survivors of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(22):2661-6.
- ↑ Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Pride YB, Kirtane AJ, Aroesty JM, Stein EB, Ciaglo LN, Southard MC, Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Braunwald E (January 2008). "Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel on nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolytic administration for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (CLARITY-TIMI) 28 study". American Heart Journal 155 (1): 133–9. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.034. PMID 18082504. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, Collet JP, Thomas D (July 2004). "Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis". JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association 292 (3): 362–6. doi:10.1001/jama.292.3.362. PMID 15265852. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Montalescot G, Antoniucci D, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Borentain M, Migliorini A, Boutron C, Collet JP, Vicaut E (February 2007). "Abciximab in primary coronary stenting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a European meta-analysis on individual patients' data with long-term follow-up". European Heart Journal 28 (4): 443–9. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl472. PMID 17251257. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Topol EJ (June 2001). "Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: the GUSTO V randomised trial". Lancet 357 (9272): 1905–14. PMID 11425410. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Roe MT, Giugliano RP, Tuttle R, Hasselbad V, Murphy SA, Antman EM, Ohman EM, Harrington RA, Granger CB, Mahaffey KW, Cannon CP, Lincoff AM, Gibson CM, Armstrong PW, van de Werf FJ, Califf RM, Topol EJ, Braunwald E. Safety of Adjunctive Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade During Rescue/Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Full-Dose Fibrinolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41(6 Suppl A):332A.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Gruberg L, Suleiman M, Kapeliovich M, Hammerman H, Grenadier E, Boulus M, Amikam S, Markiewicz W, Beyar R (February 2006). "Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction". The Journal of Invasive Cardiology 18 (2): 59–62. PMID 16446517. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Marciniak SJ, Mascelli MA, Furman MI, Michelson AD, Jakubowski JA, Jordan RE, Marchese PJ, Frelinger AL (June 2002). "An additional mechanism of action of abciximab: dispersal of newly formed platelet aggregates". Thrombosis and Haemostasis 87 (6): 1020–5. PMID 12083481. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Speich HE, Earhart AD, Hill SN, Cholera S, Kueter TJ, Smith JN, White MM, Jennings LK (June 2009). "Variability of platelet aggregate dispersal with glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists eptifibatide and abciximab". Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis : JTH 7 (6): 983–91. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03432.x. PMID 19548907. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Moser M, Bertram U, Peter K, Bode C, Ruef J (April 2003). "Abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban exhibit dose-dependent potencies to dissolve platelet aggregates". Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 41 (4): 586–92. PMID 12658060. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Gibson CM, Buros J, Ciaglo LN, Southard MC, Takao S, Harrigan C, Filopei J, Lew M, Marble SJ, Murphy SA, Cohen MG (July 2007). "Impact of iodinated contrast injections on percent diameter coronary arterial stenosis and implications for trials of intracoronary pharmacotherapies in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction". The American Journal of Cardiology 100 (1): 13–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.068. PMID 17599433. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Gibson CM, Jennings LK, Murphy SA, Lorenz DP, Giugliano RP, Harrington RA, Cholera S, Krishnan R, Califf RM, Braunwald E (August 2004). "Association between platelet receptor occupancy after eptifibatide (integrilin) therapy and patency, myocardial perfusion, and ST-segment resolution among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: an INTEGRITI (Integrilin and Tenecteplase in Acute Myocardial Infarction) substudy". Circulation 110 (6): 679–84. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000137912.11655.F6. PMID 15262838. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Deibele AJ, Jennings LK, Tcheng JE, Neva C, Earhart AD, Gibson CM (February 2010). "Intracoronary eptifibatide bolus administration during percutaneous coronary revascularization for acute coronary syndromes with evaluation of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy and platelet function: the Intracoronary Eptifibatide (ICE) Trial". Circulation 121 (6): 784–91. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.882746. PMID 20124127. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Gibson CM, Kirtane AJ, Murphy SA, Rohrbeck S, Menon V, Lins J, Kazziha S, Rokos I, Shammas NW, Palabrica TM, Fish P, McCabe CH, Braunwald E (October 2006). "Early initiation of eptifibatide in the emergency department before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Time to Integrilin Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TITAN)-TIMI 34 trial". American Heart Journal 152 (4): 668–75. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.003. PMID 16996831. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Antman EM, Giugliano RP, Gibson CM, McCabe CH, Coussement P, Kleiman NS, Vahanian A, Adgey AA, Menown I, Rupprecht HJ, Van der Wieken R, Ducas J, Scherer J, Anderson K, Van de Werf F, Braunwald E (June 1999). "Abciximab facilitates the rate and extent of thrombolysis: results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 14 trial. The TIMI 14 Investigators". Circulation 99 (21): 2720–32. PMID 10351964. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ (June 2000) "Trial of abciximab with and without low-dose reteplase for acute myocardial infarction. Strategies for Patency Enhancement in the Emergency Department (SPEED) Group". Circulation 101 (24): 2788–94. PMID 10859283.
- ↑ Lincoff AM, Califf RM, Van de Werf F, Willerson JT, White HD, Armstrong PW, Guetta V, Gibler WB, Hochman JS, Bode C, Vahanian A, Steg PG, Ardissino D, Savonitto S, Bar F, Sadowski Z, Betriu A, Booth JE, Wolski K, Waller M, Topol EJ (November 2002). "Mortality at 1 year with combination platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and reduced-dose fibrinolytic therapy vs conventional fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: GUSTO V randomized trial". JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association 288 (17): 2130–5. PMID 12413372. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, et al (April 2005). "Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials". JAMA 293 (14): 1759–65. doi:10.1001/jama.293.14.1759. PMID 15827315.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Valgimigli M, Campo G, Percoco G, Bolognese L, Vassanelli C, Colangelo S, de Cesare N, Rodriguez AE, Ferrario M, Moreno R, Piva T, Sheiban I, Pasquetto G, Prati F, Nazzaro MS, Parrinello G, Ferrari R (April 2008). "Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial". JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association 299 (15): 1788–99. doi:10.1001/jama.299.15.joc80026. PMID 18375998. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Dasgupta H, Blankenship JC, Wood GC, Frey CM, Demko SL, Menapace FJ (August 2000). "Thrombocytopenia complicating treatment with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors: a pooled analysis". American Heart Journal 140 (2): 206–11. doi:10.1067/mhj.2000.107554. PMID 10925331. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Valgimigli M, Percoco G, Malagutti P, Campo G, Ferrari F, Barbieri D, Cicchitelli G, McFadden EP, Merlini F, Ansani L, Guardigli G, Bettini A, Parrinello G, Boersma E, Ferrari R (May 2005). "Tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent vs abciximab and bare-metal stent for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized trial". JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association 293 (17): 2109–17. doi:10.1001/jama.293.17.2109. PMID 15870414. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ De Luca G, Ucci G, Cassetti E, Marino P (May 2009). "Benefits from small molecule administration as compared with abciximab among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a meta-analysis". Journal of the American College of Cardiology 53 (18): 1668–73. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.053. PMID 19406342. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Lee DP, Herity NA, Hiatt BL, et al (March 2003). "Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition with tirofiban before primary angioplasty improves angiographic outcomes: results of the TIrofiban Given in the Emergency Room before Primary Angioplasty (TIGER-PA) pilot trial". Circulation 107 (11): 1497–501. PMID 12654606.
- ↑ van 't Hof AW, Ernst N, de Boer MJ, et al (May 2004). "Facilitation of primary coronary angioplasty by early start of a glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitor: results of the ongoing tirofiban in myocardial infarction evaluation (On-TIME) trial". Eur. Heart J. 25 (10): 837–46. doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.003. PMID 15140531.
- ↑ Cutlip DE, Ricciardi MJ, Ling FS, et al (October 2003). "Effect of tirofiban before primary angioplasty on initial coronary flow and early ST-segment resolution in patients with acute myocardial infarction". Am. J. Cardiol. 92 (8): 977–80. PMID 14556878.
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 Maioli M, Bellandi F, Leoncini M, Toso A, Dabizzi RP (April 2007). "Randomized early versus late abciximab in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention (RELAx-AMI Trial)". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49 (14): 1517–24. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.036. PMID 17418289.
- ↑ Gabriel HM, Oliveira JA, da Silva PC, da Costa JM, da Cunha JA (August 2006). "Early administration of abciximab bolus in the emergency department improves angiographic outcome after primary PCI as assessed by TIMI frame count: results of the early ReoPro administration in myocardial infarction (ERAMI) trial". Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68 (2): 218–24. doi:10.1002/ccd.20798. PMID 16817177.
- ↑ Zorman S, Zorman D, Noc M (September 2002). "Effects of abciximab pretreatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty". Am. J. Cardiol. 90 (5): 533–6. PMID 12208418.
- ↑ Bellandi F, Maioli M, Leoncini M, Toso A, Dabizzi RP (March 2006). "Early abciximab administration in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention". Int. J. Cardiol. 108 (1): 36–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.04.025. PMID 15927285.
- ↑ Gyöngyösi M, Domanovits H, Benzer W, et al (December 2004). "Use of abciximab prior to primary angioplasty in STEMI results in early recanalization of the infarct-related artery and improved myocardial tissue reperfusion - results of the Austrian multi-centre randomized ReoPro-BRIDGING Study". Eur. Heart J. 25 (23): 2125–33. doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.09.018. PMID 15571828.
- ↑ Zeymer U, Zahn R, Schiele R, et al (October 2005). "Early eptifibatide improves TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized integrilin in acute myocardial infarction (INTAMI) pilot trial". Eur. Heart J. 26 (19): 1971–7. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi293. PMID 15857851.
- ↑ Herrmann HC, Moliterno DJ, Ohman EM, et al (November 2000). "Facilitation of early percutaneous coronary intervention after reteplase with or without abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results from the SPEED (GUSTO-4 Pilot) Trial". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36 (5): 1489–96. PMID 11079647.
- ↑ Peters S, Truemmel M, Koehler B (November 2008). "Facilitated PCI by combination fibrinolysis or upstream tirofiban in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Alteplase and Tirofiban in Acute Myocardial Infarction (ATAMI) trial". Int. J. Cardiol. 130 (2): 235–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.048. PMID 18055037.
- ↑ Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schlotterbeck K, et al (February 2004). "Early administration of reteplase plus abciximab vs abciximab alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial". JAMA 291 (8): 947–54. doi:10.1001/jama.291.8.947. PMID 14982910.
- ↑ Wong A, Mak KH, Chan C, et al (August 2004). "Combined fibrinolysis using reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab with immediate rescue angioplasty versus primary angioplasty with adjunct use of abciximab for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: Asia-Pacific Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (APAMIT) pilot study". Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62 (4): 445–52. doi:10.1002/ccd.20101. PMID 15274152.
- ↑ (July 2005) "Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the prematurely terminated ADdressing the Value of facilitated ANgioplasty after Combination therapy or Eptifibatide monotherapy in acute Myocardial Infarction (ADVANCE MI) trial". Am. Heart J. 150 (1): 116–22. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.005. PMID 16084157.
- ↑ Ellis SG, Armstrong P, Betriu A, et al (April 2004). "Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial". Am. Heart J. 147 (4): E16. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.025. PMID 15077099.
- ↑ Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, et al (February 2008). "Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial". Lancet 371 (9612): 559–68. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60268-8. PMID 18280326.
- ↑ Roe MT, Giugliano RP, Tuttle R, Hasselbad V, Murphy SA, Antman EM, Ohman EM, Harrington RA, Granger CB, Mahaffey KW, Cannon CP, Lincoff AM, Gibson CM, Armstrong PW, van de Werf FJ, Califf RM, Topol EJ, Braunwald E. Safety of Adjunctive Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade During Rescue/Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Full-Dose Fibrinolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41(6 Suppl A):332A.
- ↑ Gore JM, Spencer FA, Gurfinkel EP, López-Sendón J, Steg PG, Granger CB, FitzGerald G, Agnelli G (January 2009). "Thrombocytopenia in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE)]". The American Journal of Cardiology 103 (2): 175–80. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.055. PMID 19121432. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Merlini PA, Rossi M, Menozzi A, Buratti S, Brennan DM, Moliterno DJ, Topol EJ, Ardissino D (May 2004). "Thrombocytopenia caused by abciximab or tirofiban and its association with clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stenting". Circulation 109 (18): 2203–6. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000127867.41621.85. PMID 15117843. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Nikolsky E, Sadeghi HM, Effron MB, Mehran R, Lansky AJ, Na Y, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, Stuckey TD, Turco M, Carroll JD, Grines CL, Stone GW (August 2005). "Impact of in-hospital acquired thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction". The American Journal of Cardiology 96 (4): 474–81. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.005. PMID 16098296. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ Wang TY, Ou FS, Roe MT, Harrington RA, Ohman EM, Gibler WB, Peterson ED (May 2009). "Incidence and prognostic significance of thrombocytopenia developed during acute coronary syndrome in contemporary clinical practice". Circulation 119 (18): 2454–62. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.827162. PMID 19398666. Retrieved on 2010-06-30.
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 47.2 O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. (December 2012). "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Circulation. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84. PMID 23247303.
- ↑ 48.0 48.1 Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Nallamothu BK, Ting HH (December 2011). "2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions". Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58 (24): 2550–83. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.006. PMID 22070837. Retrieved on 2011-12-08.
- ↑ 49.0 49.1 Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC, King SB, Anderson JL, Antman EM et al. (2009). "2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.". Circulation 120 (22): 2271-306. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192663. PMID 19923169.
- ↑ 50.0 50.1 Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M et al. (2004). "ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction).". Circulation 110 (5): 588-636. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA. PMID 15289388.
- ↑ Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL (February 2006). "Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials". Lancet 367 (9510): 579–88. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68148-8. PMID 16488801. Retrieved on 2011-12-12.
- ↑ Van't Hof AW, Ten Berg J, Heestermans T, Dill T, Funck RC, van Werkum W, Dambrink JH, Suryapranata H, van Houwelingen G, Ottervanger JP, Stella P, Giannitsis E, Hamm C (August 2008). "Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial". Lancet 372 (9638): 537–46. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61235-0. PMID 18707985. Retrieved on 2011-12-12.
- ↑ 53.0 53.1 ten Berg JM, van 't Hof AW, Dill T, Heestermans T, van Werkum JW, Mosterd A, van Houwelingen G, Koopmans PC, Stella PR, Boersma E, Hamm C (June 2010). "Effect of early, pre-hospital initiation of high bolus dose tirofiban in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on short- and long-term clinical outcome". Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55 (22): 2446–55. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.091. PMID 20510211. Retrieved on 2011-12-12.
- ↑ Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, van Boven AJ, Widimsky P, Andersen HR, Betriu A, Savonitto S, Adamus J, Peruga JZ, Hamankiewicz M, Pluta W, Oldroyd K, Ecollan P, Janssens L, Armstrong P, Brodie BR, Herrmann HC, Montalescot G, Neumann FJ, Effron MB, Barnathan ES, Topol EJ (October 2009). "1-year survival in a randomized trial of facilitated reperfusion: results from the FINESSE (Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events) trial". JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions 2 (10): 909–16. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.009. PMID 19850248. Retrieved on 2011-12-12.
- ↑ Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, van Boven AJ, Widimsky P, Janssens L, Andersen HR, Betriu A, Savonitto S, Adamus J, Peruga JZ, Kosmider M, Katz O, Neunteufl T, Jorgova J, Dorobantu M, Grinfeld L, Armstrong P, Brodie BR, Herrmann HC, Montalescot G, Neumann FJ, Effron MB, Barnathan ES, Topol EJ (May 2008). "Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction". The New England Journal of Medicine 358 (21): 2205–17. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706816. PMID 18499565. Retrieved on 2011-12-12.
- ↑ El Khoury C, Dubien PY, Mercier C, Belle L, Debaty G, Capel O, Perret T, Savary D, Serre P, Bonnefoy E (May 2010). "Prehospital high-dose tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. The AGIR-2 study". Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 103 (5): 285–92. doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2010.04.005. PMID 20619238. Retrieved on 2011-12-12.
- ↑ Antoniucci D, Migliorini A, Parodi G, Valenti R, Rodriguez A, Hempel A, Memisha G, Santoro GM (April 2004). "Abciximab-supported infarct artery stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction and long-term survival: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing infarct artery stenting plus abciximab with stenting alone". Circulation 109 (14): 1704–6. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000126284.40075.98. PMID 15066943. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Schmitt C, Blasini R, Hadamitzky M, Mehilli J, Gawaz M, Schleef M, Seyfarth M, Dirschinger J, Schömig A (March 2000). "Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with abciximab on clinical and angiographic restenosis rate after the placement of coronary stents following acute myocardial infarction". Journal of the American College of Cardiology 35 (4): 915–21. PMID 10732888. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ 59.0 59.1 Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia E, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Carroll JD, Rutherford BD, Lansky AJ (March 2002). "Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction". The New England Journal of Medicine 346 (13): 957–66. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa013404. PMID 11919304. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ 60.0 60.1 Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, Ecollan P, Elhadad S, Villain P, Boulenc JM, Morice MC, Maillard L, Pansiéri M, Choussat R, Pinton P (June 2001). "Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction". The New England Journal of Medicine 344 (25): 1895–903. doi:10.1056/NEJM200106213442503. PMID 11419426. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Schulz S, Früngel S, Nekolla SG, Moshage W, Dotzer F, Huber K, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Seyfarth M, Martinoff S, Schwaiger M, Schömig A (April 2009). "Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial". Circulation 119 (14): 1933–40. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.818617. PMID 19332467. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ De Luca G, Navarese E, Marino P (November 2009). "Risk profile and benefits from Gp IIb-IIIa inhibitors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials". European Heart Journal 30 (22): 2705–13. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp118. PMID 19875386. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Bellandi F, Maioli M, Gallopin M, Toso A, Dabizzi RP (June 2004). "Increase of myocardial salvage and left ventricular function recovery with intracoronary abciximab downstream of the coronary occlusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention". Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 62 (2): 186–92. doi:10.1002/ccd.20041. PMID 15170708. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Mazzari MA, Biondi-Zoccai GG, De Vita M, Giannico F, Niccoli G, Prati F, Rebuzzi AG, Mongiardo R, Crea F (December 2005). "Angiographic evaluation of the effect of intracoronary abciximab administration in patients undergoing urgent PCI". International Journal of Cardiology 105 (3): 250–5. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.11.037. PMID 16274764. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Iversen A, Galatius S, Jensen JS (November 2008). "The Optimal Route of Administration of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Intravenous Versus Intracoronary". Current Cardiology Reviews 4 (4): 293–9. doi:10.2174/157340308786349480. PMID 20066137. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Wöhrle J, Nusser T, Mayer C, Kochs M, Hombach V (January 2008). "Intracoronary application of abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction". EuroIntervention : Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 3 (4): 465–9. PMID 19736089. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Kakkar AK, Moustapha A, Hanley HG, Weiss M, Caldito G, Misra P, Reddy PC, Tandon N (January 2004). "Comparison of intracoronary vs. intravenous administration of abciximab in coronary stenting". Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions :Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 61 (1): 31–4. doi:10.1002/ccd.10730. PMID 14696156. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Bertrand OF, Rodés-Cabau J, Larose E, Rinfret S, Gaudreault V, Proulx G, Barbeau G, Déry JP, Gleeton O, Manh-Nguyen C, Noël B, Roy L, Costerousse O, De Larochellière R (June 2010). "Intracoronary compared to intravenous Abciximab and high-dose bolus compared to standard dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a two-by-two factorial placebo-controlled randomized study". The American Journal of Cardiology 105 (11): 1520–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.006. PMID 20494655. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Wöhrle J, Grebe OC, Nusser T, Al-Khayer E, Schaible S, Kochs M, Hombach V, Höher M (April 2003). "Reduction of major adverse cardiac events with intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus application of abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing coronary angioplasty". Circulation 107 (14): 1840–3. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000066852.98038.D1. PMID 12682003. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Deibele AJ, Kirtane AJ, Pinto DS, Lucca MJ, Neva C, Shui A, Murphy SA, Tcheng JE, Gibson CM (August 2006). "Intracoronary bolus administration of eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary stenting for non ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina". Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 22 (1): 47–50. doi:10.1007/s11239-006-7454-8. PMID 16786232. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Yang XC, Zhang DP, Wang LF, Xu L, Ge YG, Wang HS, Li WM, Ni ZH, Xia K, Lian Y, Xue YL, Ma LX (June 2007). "[Effects of intracoronary or intravenous tirofiban administration in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention]" (in Chinese). Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 35 (6): 517–22. PMID 17711710. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Hansen PR, Iversen A, Abdulla J (June 2010). "Improved clinical outcomes with intracoronary compared to intravenous abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis". The Journal of Invasive Cardiology 22 (6): 278–82. PMID 20516508. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Galache Osuna JG, Sánchez-Rubio J, Calvo I, Diarte JA, Lukic A, Placer LJ (June 2006). "[Does intracoronary abciximab improve the outcome of percutaneous coronary interventions? A randomized controlled trial]" (in Spanish; Castilian). Revista Española De Cardiología 59 (6): 567–74. PMID 16790200. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Wu TG, Zhao Q, Huang WG, Wei JR, Chen SW, Zhao J, Huang LP, Wang LX (October 2008). "Effect of intracoronary tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome". Circulation Journal : Official Journal of the Japanese Circulation Society 72 (10): 1605–9. PMID 18753700. Retrieved on 2011-12-14.
- ↑ Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burchenal JE, et al. (August 1998). "Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. ReoPro and Primary PTCA Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Investigators". Circulation 98 (8): 734–41. PMID 9727542.
- ↑ Akerblom A, James SK, Koutouzis M, et al. (August 2010). "Eptifibatide is noninferior to abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry)". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 56 (6): 470–5. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.093. PMID 20670756.
- ↑ Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC, Alpert JS, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK (August 2004). "ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction)". Circulation 110 (9): e82–292. PMID 15339869.
There is no pharmaceutical or device industry support for this site and we need your viewer supported Donations | Editorial Board | Governance | Licensing | Disclaimers | Avoid Plagiarism | Policies