Vulnerable plaque
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
|
WikiDoc Resources for Vulnerable plaque | |
|
Articles | |
|---|---|
|
Most recent articles on Vulnerable plaque Most cited articles on Vulnerable plaque | |
|
Media | |
|
Powerpoint slides on Vulnerable plaque | |
|
Evidence Based Medicine | |
|
Cochrane Collaboration on Vulnerable plaque | |
|
Clinical Trials | |
|
Ongoing Trials on Vulnerable plaque at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Vulnerable plaque Clinical Trials on Vulnerable plaque at Google
| |
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt | |
|
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Vulnerable plaque NICE Guidance on Vulnerable plaque
| |
|
Books | |
|
News | |
|
Commentary | |
|
Definitions | |
|
Patient Resources / Community | |
|
Patient resources on Vulnerable plaque Discussion groups on Vulnerable plaque Patient Handouts on Vulnerable plaque Directions to Hospitals Treating Vulnerable plaque Risk calculators and risk factors for Vulnerable plaque
| |
|
Healthcare Provider Resources | |
|
Causes & Risk Factors for Vulnerable plaque | |
|
Continuing Medical Education (CME) | |
|
International | |
|
| |
|
Businness | |
|
Experimental / Informatics | |
| Cardiology Network |
 Discuss Vulnerable plaque further in the WikiDoc Cardiology Network |
| Adult Congenital |
|---|
| Biomarkers |
| Cardiac Rehabilitation |
| Congestive Heart Failure |
| CT Angiography |
| Echocardiography |
| Electrophysiology |
| Cardiology General |
| Genetics |
| Health Economics |
| Hypertension |
| Interventional Cardiology |
| MRI |
| Nuclear Cardiology |
| Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| Prevention |
| Public Policy |
| Pulmonary Embolism |
| Stable Angina |
| Valvular Heart Disease |
| Vascular Medicine |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Phone:617-525-6884 ; Associate Editor: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2] Phone:617-525-7431
Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [3] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Introduction
A vulnerable plaque is an atheromatous plaque which is particularly prone to produce sudden major problems, such as a heart attack or stroke.
Generally an atheroma becomes vulnerable if it grows more rapidly and has a thin cover separating it from the bloodstream inside the arterial lumen. Tearing of the cover is called plaque rupture.
Criteria for defining vulnerable plaque
Major criteria
- Active inflammation (monocyte/macrophage/T-cell infiltration)
- Thin cap with large lipid core
- Endothelial denudation with superficial platelet aggregation
- Fissured plaque
- Stenosis greater than 90%
Minor criteria
- Superficial calcified nodule
- Glistening yellow in color
- Intraplaque hemorrhage
- Endothelial dysfunction
- Outward (positive) remodeling
Pathomorphology
Because artery walls typically enlarge in response to enlarging plaques, these plaques do not usually produce much stenosis of the artery lumen. Therefore, they are not detected by cardiac stress tests or angiography, the tests most commonly performed clinically with the goal of predicting susceptibility to future heart attack. In fact these lesions are not considered as "critical" and/or interventionable by an interventional cardiologist.
In many cases, a vulnerable plaque has a thin fibrous cap and a large and soft lipid pool underlying the cap. These characteristics together with the usual hemodynamic pulsating expansion during systole and elastic recoil contraction during diastole contribute to a high mechanical stress zone on the fibrous cap of the atheroma, making it prone to rupture. Increased hemodynamic stress correlates with increased rates of major cardiovascular events associated with exercise, especially exercise beyond levels the individual does routinely.
Diagnostic Modalities
Non-Invasive
Invasive
Clinical Importance
The most frequent cause of a cardiac event following rupture of a vulnerable plaque is blood clotting on top of the site of the ruptured plaque that blocks the lumen of the artery, thereby stopping blood flow to the tissues the artery supplies.
Upon rupture, atheroma tissue debris may spill into the blood stream; these debris are often too large (over 5 micrometers) to pass on through the capillaries downstream. In this, the usual situation, the debris obstruct smaller downstream branches of the artery resulting in temporary to permanent end artery/capillary closure with loss of blood supply to, and death of the previously supplied tissues. A severe case of this can be seen during angioplasty in the slow clearance of injected contrast down the artery lumen. This situation is often termed non-reflow.
Additionally, atheroma rupture may allow bleeding from the lumen into the inner tissue of the atheroma making the atheroma size suddenly increase and protrude into the lumen of the artery producing lumen narrowing or even total obstruction.
Because vulnerable plaques are not revealed by either cardiac stress testing or coronary angiography, the tests most commonly performed clinically with the goal of testing susceptibility to future heart attack, several medical research efforts, starting in the early to mid-1990s, have worked on using intravascular ultrasound IVUS), thermography,(near-infrared spectroscopy) careful clinical follow-up and other methods, to predict these lesions and the individuals most prone to future heart attacks. These efforts remain largely research with no useful clinical methods to date (2006).
However, another approach to detecting and understanding plaque behavior, used in research and by a few clinicians, is to use ultrasound to non-invasively measure wall thickness, usually abbreviated IMT in portions of larger arteries closest to the skin, such as the carotid or femoral arteries. While stability vs. vulnerability cannot be readily distinguished in this way, it is possible to perform careful quantitative baseline measurements of the thickest portions of the arterial wall (locations with the most plaque accumulation), measurements generally termed IMT (intimal medial thickness). While tedious, with care, documenting the (a) IMT, (b) location of each measurement and (c) the apparent plaque size, a basis for tracking and partially verifying the effects of medical treatments on the progression, stability or potential regression of plaque, within a given individual over time, can be achieved.
Repeated atheroma rupture and healing is one of the mechanisms, perhaps the dominant one, which creates artery stenosis.
Management of Patients with Vulnerable Plaque
References
Newer clinical trail results (2007), e.g. the COURAGE trial[1], have demonstrated that aggressively treating some of the physiologic behavioral factors which promote atheromas with "Optimal Medical Therapy" (not opening stenoses, per-se) produced the most effective results in terms of improving human survival and quality of life for those who have been identified as having already developed advanced cardiovascular disease with many vulnerable plaques.
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .
