Syndrome X: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


==Natural history, complications, and prognosis==
==Natural history, complications, and prognosis==
Syndrome X does not appear to be associated with an excess of major coronary events.  
Syndrome X does not appear to be associated with an excess of major coronary events. In a longitudinal study of 99 patients with Syndorme X over 7 +/- 4 years, left ventricular function was stable: fractional shortening at baseline was 35.4 +/- 4% vs. 35.6 +/- 3% at follow-up and [[congestive heart failure]] developed in only one patient<ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>. Symptoms did not change in about tho thirds of patients, they improved in 10% of patients, and they were worse in about a quarter of patients <ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>


The absence of significant coronary artery disease on coronary angiography is associated with a good prognosis. Among 3,136 patients with normal angiograms, the 7 year survival rate was 96%<ref name="pmid3512658">{{cite journal| author=Kemp HG, Kronmal RA, Vlietstra RE, Frye RL| title=Seven year survival of patients with normal or near normal coronary arteriograms: a CASS registry study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1986 | volume= 7 | issue= 3 | pages= 479-83 | pmid=3512658 | doi= | pmc= | url= }} </ref>.
The absence of significant coronary artery disease on coronary angiography is associated with a good prognosis. Among 3,136 patients with normal angiograms, the 7 year survival rate was 96%<ref name="pmid3512658">{{cite journal| author=Kemp HG, Kronmal RA, Vlietstra RE, Frye RL| title=Seven year survival of patients with normal or near normal coronary arteriograms: a CASS registry study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1986 | volume= 7 | issue= 3 | pages= 479-83 | pmid=3512658 | doi= | pmc= | url= }} </ref>.
Line 47: Line 47:
===Symptoms===
===Symptoms===
All 99 patients with Syndrome X in one study had exertional angina, and 41 of them had angina at rest<ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>.  In patients with syndrome X, the anginal pain tends to last longer after cessation of exertion (> 10 minutes in 53% of patients<ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>) than is typical of patients with fixed obstructions of the epicardial arteries (pain generally lasts 2 to 5 minutes).  Sublingual nitroglycerine is often not as effective in the patient with Syndrome X as it is in the patient with obstructive epicardial disease, with only 42% of patients reporting relief <ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>.
All 99 patients with Syndrome X in one study had exertional angina, and 41 of them had angina at rest<ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>.  In patients with syndrome X, the anginal pain tends to last longer after cessation of exertion (> 10 minutes in 53% of patients<ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>) than is typical of patients with fixed obstructions of the epicardial arteries (pain generally lasts 2 to 5 minutes).  Sublingual nitroglycerine is often not as effective in the patient with Syndrome X as it is in the patient with obstructive epicardial disease, with only 42% of patients reporting relief <ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>.
===Ambulatory Holter Monitoring===
Approximately tow thirds of patients (64/99 in one study) will experience ST segment depression on ambulatory Holter monitoring<ref name="pmid7884081">{{cite journal| author=Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA| title=Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 1995 | volume= 25 | issue= 4 | pages= 807-14 | pmid=7884081 | doi=10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7884081  }} </ref>..


===Diagnostic Studies and Criteria for Diagnosis===
===Diagnostic Studies and Criteria for Diagnosis===

Revision as of 14:02, 24 July 2011

Chronic stable angina Microchapters

Acute Coronary Syndrome Main Page

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Classic
Chronic Stable Angina
Atypical
Walk through Angina
Mixed Angina
Nocturnal Angina
Postprandial Angina
Cardiac Syndrome X
Vasospastic Angina

Differentiating Chronic Stable Angina from Acute Coronary Syndromes

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Stratification

Pretest Probability of CAD in a Patient with Angina

Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Test Selection Guideline for the Individual Basis

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Exercise ECG

Chest X Ray

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Pharmacologic Stress

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Thallium

Echocardiography

Exercise Echocardiography

Computed coronary tomography angiography(CCTA)

Positron Emission Tomography

Ambulatory ST Segment Monitoring

Electron Beam Tomography

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Coronary Angiography

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Revascularization

PCI
CABG
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Alternative Therapies for Refractory Angina

Transmyocardial Revascularization (TMR)
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
Enhanced External Counter Pulsation (EECP)
ACC/AHA Guidelines for Alternative Therapies in patients with Refractory Angina

Discharge Care

Patient Follow-Up
Rehabilitation

Secondary Prevention

Guidelines for Asymptomatic Patients

Noninvasive Testing in Asymptomatic Patients
Risk Stratification by Coronary Angiography
Pharmacotherapy to Prevent MI and Death in Asymptomatic Patients

Landmark Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

Syndrome X On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Syndrome X

CDC onSyndrome X

Syndrome X in the news

Blogs on Syndrome X

to Hospitals Treating Syndrome X

Risk calculators and risk factors for Syndrome X

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

The terms Syndrome X or Metabolic syndrome X may also be referring to metabolic syndrome.

Synonyms and key words: Microvascular angina

Overview

(Cardiac) syndrome X is angina (chest pain) associated with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease. The disorder has been hypothesized to be a disorder of the coronary microvasculature rather than the large caliber epicardial coronary arteries.

Pathophysiology

In a large percentage of patients, there is microvascular dysfunction. Specifically, the microvasculature cannot dilate to accomadate increased blood flow during exertion to meet the needs of myocardial metabolism.

Most likely the underlying pathophysiology is heterogenous, and multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms have been proposed with variable data to support them:

Adenosine as a Cause of Chest Pain

Both endogenous and exogenous adenosine can cause chest discomfort through stimulation of sensory nerves in the heart [1][2]. Huang et al have demonstrated that both A1- and A2-adenosine receptors are present on the cardiac sensory nerve endings of dorsal root ganglion neurons. These sensory neurons are active in the absence of ischemia, but become further activated during myocardial ischemia[2].

An Extension of Dysautonomias

Syndrome X has been associated with dysautonomias and with a greater frequency of autonomic symptoms such as tachycardia, dyspnea, dizziness, and paresthesias [3]. It has therefore been hypothesized that Syndrome X may be an extension of abnormalities of the autonomic nervous system.

"Female Pattern" of Atherosclerosis

It has also been speculated that although the coronary arteriogram may appear normal, there may in fact be diffuse atherosclerosis present in what has been termed "a female pattern" of disease.

Enhanced Pain Sensitivity

Patients with normal coronary arteries and myocardial ischemia have a lower pain threshold and a lower tolerance to pain induced by adenosine [4].

Panic Disorder

Approximately one third of patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary arteries are diagnosed with panic disorder [5].

Epidemiology and Demographics

Syndrome X occurs more often in women. 61.5% of women with Syndrome X are postmenopausal at the time of onset[6]. Some studies have found an increased risk of other vasospastic disorders in syndrome X patients, such as migraine and Raynaud's phenomenon.

Natural history, complications, and prognosis

Syndrome X does not appear to be associated with an excess of major coronary events. In a longitudinal study of 99 patients with Syndorme X over 7 +/- 4 years, left ventricular function was stable: fractional shortening at baseline was 35.4 +/- 4% vs. 35.6 +/- 3% at follow-up and congestive heart failure developed in only one patient[6]. Symptoms did not change in about tho thirds of patients, they improved in 10% of patients, and they were worse in about a quarter of patients [6]

The absence of significant coronary artery disease on coronary angiography is associated with a good prognosis. Among 3,136 patients with normal angiograms, the 7 year survival rate was 96%[7].

Risk Factors

Female gender and left ventricular hypertrophy are associated with an excess risk of Syndrome X. The onset in women often occurs after menopause[6].

Other Conditions to Distinguish Syndrome X From

Syndrome X should be distinguished from Prinzmetal's angina, a disorder which involves spasm of the main epicardial coronary arteries. Syndrome X involves dysfunction of the downstream microvasculature. Syndrome X must also be distinguished from esophageal spasm.

Diagnosis

Symptoms

All 99 patients with Syndrome X in one study had exertional angina, and 41 of them had angina at rest[6]. In patients with syndrome X, the anginal pain tends to last longer after cessation of exertion (> 10 minutes in 53% of patients[6]) than is typical of patients with fixed obstructions of the epicardial arteries (pain generally lasts 2 to 5 minutes). Sublingual nitroglycerine is often not as effective in the patient with Syndrome X as it is in the patient with obstructive epicardial disease, with only 42% of patients reporting relief [6].

Ambulatory Holter Monitoring

Approximately tow thirds of patients (64/99 in one study) will experience ST segment depression on ambulatory Holter monitoring[6]..

Diagnostic Studies and Criteria for Diagnosis

Syndrome X is a diagnosis of exclusion. The diagnostic criteria are as follows:

ESC Guidelines for investigation in patients with Syndrome X (DO NOT EDIT)[8]

Class I

1. Resting echocardiogram in patients with angina and normal or non-obstructed coronary arteries to assess for presence of ventricular hypertrophy and/or diastolic dysfunction. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1. Intracoronary acetylcholine during coronary arteriography, if the arteriogram is visually normal, to assess endothelium-dependent coronary flow reserve, and exclude vasospasm. (Level of Evidence: C)

2. Intracoronary ultrasound, coronary flow reserve, or FFR measurement to exclude missed obstructive lesions, if angiographic appearances are suggestive of a nonobstructive lesion rather than completely normal, and stress imaging techniques identify an extensive area of ischaemia. (Level of Evidence: C)

Treatment

The mainstay of treatment in patients with Syndrome X are calcium channel blockers, such as nifedipine and diltiazem. Other therapies include:

  • Nitrates. Sublingual nitroglycerine is often not as effective in the patient with Syndrome X as it is in the patient with obstructive epicardial disease, with only 42% of patients reporting relief [6].
  • Beta blockers
  • Aminophylline - may be effective via inhibition of adenosine receptors.
  • Estrogen - may be effective in women.

ESC Guidelines for pharmacological therapy to improve symptoms in patients with Syndrome X (DO NOT EDIT)[8]

Class I

1. Therapy with nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers alone or in combination. (Level of Evidence: B)

2. Statin therapy in patients with hyperlipidaemia. (Level of Evidence: B)

3. ACE inhibitors in patients with hypertension. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIa

1. Trial of therapy with other anti-anginals including nicorandil and metabolic agents. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1. Aminophylline for continued pain, despite Class I measures. (Level of Evidence: C)

2. Imipramine for continued pain, despite Class I measures. (Level of Evidence: C)

References

  1. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200210243471717
  2. 2.0 2.1 Huang MH, Sylvén C, Horackova M, Armour JA (1995). "Ventricular sensory neurons in canine dorsal root ganglia: effects of adenosine and substance P.". Am J Physiol. 269 (2 Pt 2): R318–24. PMID 7544544.
  3. Katon W, Hall ML, Russo J, Cormier L, Hollifield M, Vitaliano PP; et al. (1988). "Chest pain: relationship of psychiatric illness to coronary arteriographic results". Am J Med. 84 (1): 1–9. PMID 3337115.
  4. Lagerqvist B, Sylvén C, Waldenström A (1992). "Lower threshold for adenosine-induced chest pain in patients with angina and normal coronary angiograms". Br Heart J. 68 (3): 282–5. PMC 1025071. PMID 1389759.
  5. Mukerji V, Beitman BD, Alpert MA, Lamberti JW, DeRosear L, Basha IM (1987). "Panic disorder: a frequent occurrence in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries". Angiology. 38 (3): 236–40. PMID 3565851.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 Kaski JC, Rosano GM, Collins P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A, Poole-Wilson PA (1995). "Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study". J Am Coll Cardiol. 25 (4): 807–14. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(94)00507-M. PMID 7884081.
  7. Kemp HG, Kronmal RA, Vlietstra RE, Frye RL (1986). "Seven year survival of patients with normal or near normal coronary arteriograms: a CASS registry study". J Am Coll Cardiol. 7 (3): 479–83. PMID 3512658.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F; et al. (2006). "Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology". Eur Heart J. 27 (11): 1341–81. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl001. PMID 16735367.

Review Articles

Template:SIB


Template:WikiDoc Sources