Coronary heart disease primary prevention: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 140: Line 140:
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}
[[Category:Cardiology]]

Revision as of 21:36, 4 January 2013

Coronary heart disease Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Differentiating Coronary heart disease from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening and Risk Stratification

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Pretest Probability

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Coronary heart disease primary prevention On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Coronary heart disease primary prevention

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Coronary heart disease primary prevention

CDC on Coronary heart disease primary prevention

Coronary heart disease primary prevention in the news

Blogs on Coronary heart disease primary prevention

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Coronary heart disease primary prevention

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

The LDL target in primary prevention depends upon the patient's risk factors. If the patient has CHD or its equivalent, then the LDL goal is under 100 mg/dl. If the patient has 2 risk factors, the LDL goal is 130 mg/dl. If the patient has < 2 risk factors, the LDL goal is < 160 mg/dl.

Risk Equivalents in Primary Prevention

If CHD or a risk equivalent is present, the LDL goal is < 100 mg/dl. You are essentially considered to have the equivalent of coronary heart disease if you have any of the following "risk equivalents":

CV Risk Factors in the Setting of Primary Prevention

If you have two or more of the following risk factors, the LDL goal is < 130 mg/dl:

  • Cigarette smoking
  • Family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD)
  • High LDL (defined as LDL > 130 mg /dl)
  • Hypertension ( defined as a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg or if the patient is on antihypertensive drugs)
  • Low HDL (defined as HDL < 40 mg/dL males, < 50 mg/dL in females)
  • Older Age (men ≥45 years old; women ≥55 years old)

If you have < two risk factors, the goal is an LDL < 160 mg/dl.

Primary Prevention: LDL Goals for Various Categories of Risk[1]

Risk Category LDL-C Goal Consider Drug Therapy
CHD or CHD risk equivalent <100 mg/dl >130 mg/dl*
> 2 Risk Factors
10 yr risk 10-20% <130 mg/dl >130 mg/dl
10 yr risk < 10% <130 mg/dl > 160 mg/dl
< 2 Risk Factors <160 mg/dl >190 mg/dl

Avoid Drug Interactions with the LDL-Lowering Agents Simvastatin, Atorvastatin or Lovastatin

While LDL-lowering agents are widely prescribed in primary prevention, care should be taken to select the appropriate statin based upon concommittant medications. As a result of the metabolism via the CYP 3A4 pathway, simvastatin, atorvastatin and lovastatin interact with the following agents and should be avoided. The patient should be switched to pravastatin.

Reduce Simvastatin Dosing in the Following Scenarios

Simvastatin drug interactions include the following:

  • Simvastatin 10 mg should be the maximum dose when prescribed with:
  • Simvastatin 20 mg should be the maximum dose when prescribed with:

Treat Underlying Causes of Hyperlipidemia

Treatment of Triglycerides

  • Triglyceride lowering is a secondary target of primary prevention.
  • The independent and causal relationship of elevated triglycerides to CHD outcomes is not clear, although hypertriglyceridemia is a stronger risk factor for women than men.
  • Triglyceride levels > 500 mg/dl are associated with acute pancreatitis.
  • Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with the following conditions:

Class IB

  • If the triglycerides are 200-499 mg/dL, then the non-HDL-C should be < 130 mg/dL

Class IIa

Further reduction of non-HDL to < 100 mg/dL is reasonable

Class IC

If TG are > 500 mg/dL, treat to prevent, pancreatitis before LDL-lowering therapy.

Avoid Drugs that Cause Dyslipidemia

Lifestyle Modification Goals

Aspirin in Primary Prevention

Aspirin, in doses of less than 75 to 81 mg/d[4], can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events, but may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in men.[5] The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 'strongly recommends that clinicians discuss aspirin chemoprevention with adults who are at increased risk for coronary heart disease'.[6] The Task Force defines increased risk as 'Men older than 40 years of age, postmenopausal women, and younger persons with risk factors for coronary heart disease (for example, hypertension, diabetes, or smoking) are at increased risk for heart disease and may wish to consider aspirin therapy'. More specifically, high-risk persons are 'those with a 5-year risk ≥ 3%'. A risk calculator is available.[7]

Regarding healthy women, the more recent Women's Health Study randomized controlled trial found insignficant benefit from aspirin in the reduction of cardiac events; however there was a signficant reduction in stroke.[8] Subgroup analysis showed that all benefit was confined to women over 65 years old.[8] In spite of the insignficant benefit for women < 65 years old, recent practice guidelines by the American Heart Association recommend to 'consider' aspirin in 'healthy women' <65 years of age 'when benefit for ischemic stroke prevention is likely to outweigh adverse effects of therapy'.[9]

Modification of Risk Factors that do not have a Robust Evidence Base

Just because something has been identified as a risk factor, that does not mean that lowering the risk factor improves outcomes. This is because the risk factor may not lie in the causal pathway for CHD. Risk factors that when modified may not improve outcomes include the following:

2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non -ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DO NOT EDIT)[16]

Identification of Patients at Risk (DO NOT EDIT)[16]

Class I
"1. Primary care providers should evaluate the presence and status of control of major risk factors for CHD for all patients at regular intervals (approximately every 3 to 5 years). (Level of Evidence: C)"
"2. Ten-year risk (National Cholesterol Education Program [NCEP] global risk) of developing symptomatic CHD should be calculated for all patients who have 2 or more major risk factors to assess the need for primary prevention strategies.[17][18] (Level of Evidence: B)"
"3. Patients with established CHD should be identified for secondary prevention efforts, and patients with a CHD risk equivalent (e.g., atherosclerosis in other vascular beds, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or 10-year risk greater than 20% as calculated by Framingham equations) should receive equally intensive risk factor intervention as those with clinically apparent CHD. (Level of Evidence: A)"

References

  1. Expert panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. JAMA 2001; 285:2486-2497
  2. Expert panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. JAMA 2001; 285:2486-2497
  3. Thompson PD, Buchner D, Pina IL; et al. (2003). "Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity)". Circulation. 107 (24): 3109–16. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000075572.40158.77. PMID 12821592. http://www.ngc.gov/summary/summary.aspx?ss=15&doc_id=5360&string=#s23
  4. Campbell CL, Smyth S, Montalescot G, Steinhubl SR (2007). "Aspirin dose for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review". JAMA. 297 (18): 2018–24. doi:10.1001/jama.297.18.2018. PMID 17488967.
  5. Berger J, Roncaglioni M, Avanzini F, Pangrazzi I, Tognoni G, Brown D (2006). "Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". JAMA. 295 (3): 306–13. PMID 16418466.
  6. "Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: recommendation and rationale". Ann Intern Med. 136 (2): 157–60. 2002. PMID 11790071.
  7. http://www.med-decisions.com/
  8. 8.0 8.1 Ridker P, Cook N, Lee I, Gordon D, Gaziano J, Manson J, Hennekens C, Buring J (2005). "A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women". N Engl J Med. 352 (13): 1293–304. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050613. PMID 15753114. Unknown parameter |rul= ignored (help)
  9. http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181546v1
  10. Hooper L, Thompson RL, Harrison RA, Summerbell CD, Ness AR, Moore HJ, Worthington HV, Durrington PN, Higgins JP, Capps NE, Riemersma RA, Ebrahim SB, Davey Smith G (2006). "Risks and benefits of omega 3 fats for mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review". BMJ. 332 (7544): 752–60. doi:10.1136/bmj.38755.366331.2F. PMID 16565093.
  11. Wang C, Harris WS, Chung M, Lichtenstein AH, Balk EM, Kupelnick B, Jordan HS, Lau J (2006). "n-3 Fatty acids from fish or fish-oil supplements, but not alpha-linolenic acid, benefit cardiovascular disease outcomes in primary- and secondary-prevention studies: a systematic review". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84 (1): 5–17. PMID 16825676. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat1a.chapter.38290
  12. Yokoyama M, Origasa H, Matsuzaki M; et al. (2007). "Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on major coronary events in hypercholesterolaemic patients (JELIS): a randomised open-label, blinded endpoint analysis". Lancet. 369 (9567): 1090–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60527-3. PMID 17398308.
  13. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/5_population_nutrient/en/index12.html
  14. Lopez-Garcia E, Schulze MB, Meigs JB, Manson JE, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB. (2005). "Consumption of trans fatty acids is related to plasma biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction". J Nutr. 135 (3): 562–6. PMID 15735094.
  15. Ornish D, Brown SE, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH, Armstrong WT, Ports TA, McLanahan SM, Kirkeeide RL, Brand RJ, Gould KL. (1990). "Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial". Lancet. 336 (8708): 129–33. PMID 1973470.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE; et al. (2011). "2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Circulation. 123 (18): e426–579. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318212bb8b. PMID 21444888.
  17. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB; et al. (2004). "Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines". Circulation. 110 (2): 227–39. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E. PMID 15249516.
  18. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) (2002). "Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report". Circulation. 106 (25): 3143–421. PMID 12485966.