Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sacrococcygeal teratoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Sacrococcygeal teratoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural history, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice

CDC on Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice

Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice in the news

Blogs on Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice

Directions to Hospitals Treating Sacrococcygeal teratoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[3]

Overview

Ultrasound is the diagnostic study of choice for sacrococcygeal teratoma. Findings on ultrasound include the presence of mass near the distal spine. According to Gonzalez-Crussi System, sacrococcygeal teratoma is graded on a scale from 0 - 3 based on the histology.

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Study of Choice

Grading

According to Gonzalez-Crussi System, sacrococcygeal teratoma is graded on a scale from 0 - 3 based on the histology:[1]

Grade Microscopic Features

Grade 0

Grade I

Grade II

  • Tumor contains moderate quantities of immature tissue.
  • Upto 10 - 50% tissue is immature

Grade III

References

  1. Harms D, Zahn S, Göbel U, Schneider DT (2006). "Pathology and molecular biology of teratomas in childhood and adolescence". Klin Padiatr. 218 (6): 296–302. doi:10.1055/s-2006-942271. PMID 17080330.

Template:WH Template:WS

Template:WikiDoc Sources