Diabetic foot laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diabetic foot Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Diabetic foot from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Diabetic foot laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Diabetic foot laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Diabetic foot laboratory findings

CDC on Diabetic foot laboratory findings

Diabetic foot laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Diabetic foot laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Diabetic foot

Risk calculators and risk factors for Diabetic foot laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Anahita Deylamsalehi, M.D.[2]

Overview

Worsened glycemic control could be seen in the laboratory evaluation of diabetic foot patients. Even in the presence of infection, there is no guarantee that measures such as White blood cells (WBC), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) be elevated. For detection of the main responsible microorganisms biopsy, curettage, or aspiration, a tissue sample is recommended. It is recommended to obtain a sample from discharge of the ulcer's base. Moreover, due to contamination of all ulcers, culture from non-infectious ulcers is not recommended. For confirming osteomyelitis diagnosis and for appropriate antibiotic treatment, it is critical to obtain a bone biopsy. Properly obtained specimens for culture prior to initiating empiric therapy provide useful information for guiding antibiotic selection, particularly in those with chronic or previously treated infections which are commonly caused by gram-negative bacilli or obligate anaerobic organisms.

Laboratory Findings

Obtaining Specimens

References

  1. Lepäntalo, M.; Apelqvist, J.; Setacci, C.; Ricco, J.-B.; de Donato, G.; Becker, F.; Robert-Ebadi, H.; Cao, P.; Eckstein, H.H.; De Rango, P.; Diehm, N.; Schmidli, J.; Teraa, M.; Moll, F.L.; Dick, F.; Davies, A.H. (2011). "Chapter V: Diabetic Foot". European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 42: S60–S74. doi:10.1016/S1078-5884(11)60012-9. ISSN 1078-5884.
  2. Lipsky, Benjamin A. (2004). "A report from the international consensus on diagnosing and treating the infected diabetic foot". Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 20 (S1): S68–S77. doi:10.1002/dmrr.453. ISSN 1520-7552.
  3. American Diabetes Association (1999). "Consensus Development Conference on Diabetic Foot Wound Care: 7-8 April 1999, Boston, Massachusetts. American Diabetes Association". Diabetes Care. 22 (8): 1354–60. doi:10.2337/diacare.22.8.1354. PMID 10480782.
  4. Lipsky BA (1997). "Osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients". Clin Infect Dis. 25 (6): 1318–26. doi:10.1086/516148. PMID 9431370.
  5. Wukich DK, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJ, Burns PR, Frykberg RG; et al. (2013). "Inpatient management of diabetic foot disorders: a clinical guide". Diabetes Care. 36 (9): 2862–71. doi:10.2337/dc12-2712. PMC 3747877. PMID 23970716.
  6. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG; et al. (2012). "2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections". Clin Infect Dis. 54 (12): e132–73. doi:10.1093/cid/cis346. PMID 22619242.