Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diabetic foot Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Diabetic foot from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound

CDC on Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound

Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound in the news

Blogs on Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound

Directions to Hospitals Treating Diabetic foot

Risk calculators and risk factors for Diabetic foot echocardiography or ultrasound

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Anahita Deylamsalehi, M.D.[2]

Overview

Colorful doppler ultrasound has 89% and 68% sensitivity for iliac artery and popliteal artery, respectfully. Nevertheless it's sensitivity is higher for anterior and posterior tibial arteries (90%). For a complete evaluation of lower limb perfusion all of the iliac, femoral, popliteal and tibial arteries should be scanned by colorful doppler ultrasound. Doppler ultrasound is not accurate when there is considerable calcification.

Ultrasound

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Schaper, N. C.; Andros, G.; Apelqvist, J.; Bakker, K.; Lammer, J.; Lepantalo, M.; Mills, J. L.; Reekers, J.; Shearman, C. P.; Zierler, R. E.; Hinchliffe, R. J. (2012). "Diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients with a foot ulcer. A progress report of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot". Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 28: 218–224. doi:10.1002/dmrr.2255. ISSN 1520-7552.
  2. Sheehan P, Jones P, Caselli A, Giurini JM, Veves A (2003). "Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial". Diabetes Care. 26 (6): 1879–82. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.6.1879. PMID 12766127.
  3. Lepäntalo, M.; Apelqvist, J.; Setacci, C.; Ricco, J.-B.; de Donato, G.; Becker, F.; Robert-Ebadi, H.; Cao, P.; Eckstein, H.H.; De Rango, P.; Diehm, N.; Schmidli, J.; Teraa, M.; Moll, F.L.; Dick, F.; Davies, A.H. (2011). "Chapter V: Diabetic Foot". European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 42: S60–S74. doi:10.1016/S1078-5884(11)60012-9. ISSN 1078-5884.
  4. Catalano, Carlo; Fraioli, Francesco; Laghi, Andrea; Napoli, Alessandro; Bezzi, Mario; Pediconi, Federica; Danti, Massimiliano; Nofroni, Italo; Passariello, Roberto (2004). "Infrarenal Aortic and Lower-Extremity Arterial Disease: Diagnostic Performance of Multi–Detector Row CT Angiography". Radiology. 231 (2): 555–563. doi:10.1148/radiol.2312020920. ISSN 0033-8419.