Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pseudo-Bennett fracture
ICD-10 S42.2-S42.4
ICD-9 812
eMedicine emerg/199  orthoped/271 orthoped/199

WikiDoc Resources for Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Articles

Most recent articles on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Most cited articles on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Review articles on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Articles on Pseudo-Bennett fracture in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Images of Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Photos of Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Podcasts & MP3s on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Videos on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Bandolier on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

TRIP on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Pseudo-Bennett fracture at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Clinical Trials on Pseudo-Bennett fracture at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

NICE Guidance on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

CDC on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Books

Books on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

News

Pseudo-Bennett fracture in the news

Be alerted to news on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

News trends on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Commentary

Blogs on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Definitions

Definitions of Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Discussion groups on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Patient Handouts on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Causes & Risk Factors for Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Diagnostic studies for Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Treatment of Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

International

Pseudo-Bennett fracture en Espanol

Pseudo-Bennett fracture en Francais

Business

Pseudo-Bennett fracture in the Marketplace

Patents on Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammadmain Rezazadehsaatlou[2].

Synonyms and Keywords: Epibasal fracture of the thumb


Overview

The Pseudo-Bennett fracture is usually a stable fracture consisted of the two-pieces of the proximal first metacarpal bone. It is important to separated them them from other intra-articular fractures such as Bennett fracture-dislocation and Rolando fracture due to the differences in theirmanagement.

Historical Perspective

In 1882, Edward Hallaran Bennett, described the fracture of the base of the thumb.

Causes

The main etiology of the Pseudo-Bennett fracture is an axial load is transmitted through a flexion of the thumb metacarpal joint during falling. Because at this posture the energy from the Pseudo-Bennett fracture transmitted towards the thumb joint system cause the fracture. It might be associated with fractures influencing the adjacent carpal bone (trapezium) and/or ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. As a person age, two factors cause higher risk of fractures:

  • Weaker bones
  • Greater risk of falling

Stress fractures as a common causes of fractures can be found due to the repeated stresses and strains. Importantly children having more physically active lifestyles than adults, are also prone to fractures. People with any underlying diseases such as osteoporosis, infection, or a tumor affecting their bones having a higher risk of fractures. As mentioned in previous chapters, this type of fracture is known as a pathological fracture. Stress fractures, which result from repeated stresses and strains, commonly found among professional sports people, are also common causes of fractures.

Life-threatening Causes

Common Causes

Common causes of Pseudo-Bennett fracture may include:

  • Trauma (Fall on an outstretched hand)

Less Common Causes

Less common causes of Pseudo-Bennett fracture include conditions that predisposes to fracture:

Causes by Organ System

Cardiovascular No underlying causes
Chemical/Poisoning No underlying causes
Dental No underlying causes
Dermatologic No underlying causes
Drug Side Effect No underlying causes
Ear Nose Throat No underlying causes
Endocrine No underlying causes
Environmental No underlying causes
Gastroenterologic No underlying causes
Genetic No underlying causes
Hematologic No underlying causes
Iatrogenic No underlying causes
Infectious Disease No underlying causes
Musculoskeletal/Orthopedic Osteoporosis and osteopenia.
Neurologic No underlying causes
Nutritional/Metabolic Osteoporosis and osteopenia.
Obstetric/Gynecologic No underlying causes
Oncologic No underlying causes
Ophthalmologic No underlying causes
Overdose/Toxicity No underlying causes
Psychiatric No underlying causes
Pulmonary No underlying causes
Renal/Electrolyte No underlying causes
Rheumatology/Immunology/Allergy No underlying causes
Sexual No underlying causes
Trauma Falling of car accident
Urologic No underlying causes
Miscellaneous No underlying causes

Causes in Alphabetical Order

List the causes of the disease in alphabetical order:

Pathophysiology

Mechanism

The Pseudo-Bennett fracture is caused by a falling or any types of trauma affecting the patients hand and specifically the thumb joint. The form and severity of this fracture depends on the position of the hand at the moment of hitting the ground. The width of this mentioned angle affects the localization of the fracture.

Pathophysiology

Its known that the Pseudo-Bennett fracture in normal healthy adults can be caused due to the high- and/low low-energy trauma (e.g., motor vehicle accidents), sport related injuries, falling from height.

But it should be noted that the most important Risk factors for insufficiency fractures is chronic metabolic disease such as steoporosis, osteopenia, eating-disordered behavior, higher age, prolonged corticosteroid usage, female gender, lower BMI, history of a recent falling, and prior fracture.

  • The pattern of bone fracture and severity of injury depends on variety of factors such as:
    • Patients age
    • Patients Weight
    • Patients past medical history specifically any bone diseases affecting the quality of bone (such as osteoporosis, malignancies)
    • Energy of trauma
    • Bone quality
    • Position of the specific organ during the trauma
  • The below-mentioned processes cause decreased bone mass density:

Differentiating Pseudo-Bennett fracture from other Diseases

In the orthopedic medicine its important to know that the forearm fracture should be evaluated using radiography for both confirming diagnosis and also for evaluating the surrounding tissues. Other injuries such as possible hand fracture-dislocation; radial head or coronoid fractures or lateral collateral ligament injury. If the mechanism of injury suggests particularly low energy then the Osteoporosis should be considered. The pathological Fractures occurring in a bone with a tumor or Paget's disease) are rare but possible.

Also it should be noted that the both bone fractures can be complicated by acute compartment syndrome of the forearm. Signs suggesting compartment syndrome are pain on extension of digits, and marked edema.

As another important fact in orthopedic fracture is if both-bone fractures were found in pediatric which is common after accidental trauma, but it may also be the due to the of child abuse; and in these cases a careful attention and evaluation should be considered if a child abuse is suspected

Differential Diagnoses for the Pseudo-Bennett fracture:

  • Rolando's fracture
  • Bennett's fracture


Epidemiology and Demographics

The total fractures of the thumb are common in children (22% of hand fractures affecting the in the thumb) and the elderly (20% of hand fractures affecting the in the thumb) population. Meanwhile, the Pseudo-Bennett fracture commonly found in young men and accounts for 5% of all hand fractures and 20% of metacarpal fractures.

Risk Factors

There are different risk factors that presidpose patient for the Pseudo-Bennett fracture that include:

  • High-risk contact sports
  • Higher age (elderly adults are higher prone to such fractures)
  • Reduced bone density (osteoporosis)
  • Direct blow
  • Road / traffic accidents
  • Falling on an outstretched hand with the forearm pronated
  • Direct trauma to the arm/forearm
  • Taking part in any rough or high-impact sport
  • Street fights, gunshot wounds, and domestic violence, may also cause the Pseudo-Bennett fracture
  • Road traffic accidents.

Classification

Classification of the first metacarpal fractures
Name Type Features
Oblique Extra-articular • oblique fracture line not involving the articular surface
Transverse Extra-articular
• a pure transverse fracture line not involved the articular surface
Bennett Intra-articular • intra-articular fracture with a palmar radial fragment
Rolando Intra-articular
• Y or T shaped complete intra-articular fracture
Comminuted Intra-articular • severely comminuted complete intra-articular fracture  
Gredda Classification of the Bennett's fracture
Type Features
I a fracture with a single ulnar fragment and subluxation of the metacarpal base
II an impaction fracture without subluxation of the first metacarpa
III an injury with a small ulnar avulsion fragment in association with metacarpal dislocation

Screening

Osteoporosis is an important risk factor for human affecting human bone especially in men with the age of older than 50 years old and postmenopausal and women.

Based on the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) there are three groups of patients need to be screened for the osteoporosis:

  • ·       Men with no history of osteoporosis
  • ·       Women with the age of 65≤ year old, with no previous history of pathological fracture due to the osteoporosis
  • ·       Women with the age of <65 years, with 10-year fracture risk of not less than a 65-year-old white woman (who has not any other risk factor)

Accordingly women older than age of 50 are the main target for the osteoporosis screening. There is no specific recommendation to screen men for the osteoporosis.

The USPSTF recommendations from 2002 included:

Meanwhile, there are two major modalities for the osteoporosis screening:

  1. ·       Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and lumbar spine bones
  2. ·       Quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus

*It should be noted of the two above mentioned modalities for screening the ultrasonograhy is preferred to the DXA due to its lower cost, lower ionizing radiation, more availability.

After the primary evaluation of the osteoporosis, the further evaluation are required in some cases such as:

·       Women with normal bone density or mild osteopenia: T-score of greater than −1.50 – should have screening for 15 years.

·       Women with moderate osteopenia: T-score of −1.50 to −1.99 – should have screening for 5 years.

·       Women with advanced osteopenia: T-score of −2.00 to −2.49 - should have screening for 1 year.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Natural History

In cases with untreated Pseudo-Bennett fracture the malunion and deformity of arm can be occurred.

Complications

The overall complication rate in the treatment of Pseudo-Bennett fracture were found in around 40% of cases:

  1. Neurovascular compromise: such as Ulna nerve damage
  2. Compartment syndrome
  3. Chronic disability of the DRUJ
  4. Physeal Injury
  5. Malunion of the radius
  6. Nonunion
  7. Infection
  8. Refracture following plate removal
  9. Posterior interosseois nerve (PIN) injury.
  10. Instability of the DRUJ
  11. Loss of Motion (Stiffness)
  12. Posttraumatic Arthritis
  13. Heterotopic Ossification

Prognosis

The prognosis of the Pseudo-Bennett fracture is most closely related to the amount of energy and the main direction of the trauma. High-energy injuries leading to a poor outcome due to the comminution, articular surface damage, and extensive soft-tissue injury. But the good prognosis can be found in low-energy injuries with simple fracture patterns and limited soft-tissue involvement which the anatomic restoration of the joint surface and reestablishment are stable, the outcome is routinely good, especially in low-energy injuries with simple fracture patterns and limited soft-tissue involvement.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of a Pseudo-Bennett fracture should be confirmed using a radiographic examination.

History and Symptoms

The related signs and symptoms include:

  • Deformity
  • Skin lacerations
  • Weak pulse
  • Open fractures
  • Bruising
  • Swelling
  • Stiffness
  • Inability to move
  • Pain in touch
  • Loss of function of the forearm
  • Difficulties in detection of pulses
  • Radial nerve damage

In the physical exam the orthopedic surgeon should check the vascular status and amount of swelling in the forearm. In MULTI-trauma patients or in comatose or obtunded patients a tense compartment with neurological signs or stretch pain should be considered as the compartment syndrome, and the compartment pressures should be measured and monitored. Normally the pain and soft-tissue swelling are found at the injury site (at the wrist joint). This injury should be confirmed using a radiographic evaluations. Also, patients may loss the pinch mechanism between their thumb and their index finger which can be due to the paralysis of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP).

Physical Examination

The related signs and symptoms include:

  • Edema of the shoulder
    • Most of the time the edema will be a non-pitting edema
    • Depends on the edema extent, it may even lead to compartment syndrome in the anterior and internal compartment of shoulder
  • Bruising
    • As a manifestation of internal injury to the local vessels by trauma or fractures bone
  • Decrease in range of motion
    • Movement of the fractures limb will be painful if possible at all
  • Tenderness
  • Deformity
    • Fractured bone deformity may be touchable in the internal side of the forearm if the fracture is displaced

In the physical exam the orthopedic surgeon should check the vascular status and amount of swelling in the forearm. In polytrauma patients or in comatose or obtunded patients a tense compartment with neurological signs or stretch pain should be considered as the compartment syndrome, and the compartment pressures should be measured and monitored.

Physical examination of patients with Pseudo-Bennett fracture is usually remarkable for swelling, tenderness, bruises, ecchymosis, deformity and restricted range of motion of the wrist.

Appearance of the Patient

  • Patients with Pseudo-Bennett fracture usually appears normal unless the patients had a high energy trauma causing the open wound fracture.

Vital Signs

Skin

HEENT

Neck

Lungs

Heart

Abdomen

Back

Genitourinary

Neuromuscular

  • Neuromuscular examination of patients with Pseudo-Bennett fracture is usually normal
  • However, some patients may develop neuropraxia of the branch of the Ulnar nerve resulting in decreased sensation of thumb, index and middle finger.

Laboratory Findings

There is a limited laboratory tests useful in the diagnosis of bone fractures such as the Pseudo-Bennett fracture. Meanwhile, aged men and women may have some abnormalities in their laboratory findings suggestive of osteoporosis.

Laboratory tests for the diagnosis of osteoporosis are:

  • Complete blood count (CBC)
  • Serum total calcium level
  • Serum Ionized calcium level
  • Serum phosphate level
  • Serum alkaline phosphatase level
  • Serum 25-(OH)-vitamin D level

X Ray

The orthopedic surgeon should consider to have at least two radiographic projections (ie, anteroposterior [AP] and lateral) of the forearm. These show the fracture, the extent of displacement, and the extent of comminution. The orthopedic surgeon should pay serious attention toward finding any foreign bodies in open fractures and gunshot injuries. Also imperative is to include the elbow and wrist joint in the radiographs of Pseudo-Bennett fracture to ensure that the wrist joint injuries are not missed.

CT

  • CT-scan in the case of the Pseudo-Bennett fractureis the best modality if you can not have an exclusive diagnosis by X-ray itself can not be made.

MRI

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an expensive technique that should not be used routinely.
  • MRI is a powerful diagnostic tool to assess the abnormalities of the bone, ligaments and soft tissues associated with the Pseudo-Bennett fracture, but it is known as a limited utility in radioulnar injuries and is not indicated in uncomplicated forearm fractures.
  • Meanwhile, the MRI can be useful in in following mentioned evaluations:
  • Evaluation of occult fractures
  • Evaluation of the post-traumatic or avascular necrosis of carpal bones
  • Evaluation of tendons
  • Evaluation of nerve
  • Evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome

Other Imaging Findings

There are no other imaging findings associated with Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Other Diagnostic Studies

There are no other Diagnostic studies associated with Pseudo-Bennett fracture

Treatment

Immediate stabilization of patients is the first step. Then the radial fracture and the DRUJ stabilization is recommended in these cases. Open forearm fractures considered as a surgical emergency. Pseudo-Bennett fracture occurs in younger patients who are skeletally immature; the normally they treated using a closed reduction and casting. Since closed reduction and cast application have led to unsatisfactory results. Then, Almost always the open reduction are necessary for the Pseudo-Bennett fracture. There are controversies regarding the indications for intramedullary nailing of forearm fractures.

Non-Operative Treatmen

  • The first step in managing a patient with a fracture is to stabilize the patient if he/she is unstable due to blood loss, etc by giving them intravenous fluids and giving them some painkillers if the pain is severe.
  • In children, the usual plan is to attempt closed reduction followed by cast immobilization. In adults, treatment with immobilization in a molded long arm cast can be used in those rare occasions of a non-displaced fracture of both bones of the forearm. If the fracture shifts in position, it may require surgery to put the bones back together.
  • Rigid immobilization is suggested in preference to removable splints in nonoperative treatment for the management of the Pseudo-Bennett fracture
  • For all patients with Pseudo-Bennett fracture, a post-reduction true lateral radiograph is suggested .
  • Operative fixation is suggested in preference to cast fixation for fractures with post-reduction radial shortening greater than 3 mm, dorsal tilt greater than 10º, or intra-articular displacement or step-off greater than 2 mm.
  • Patients probably do not need to begin early wrist motion routinely after stable fracture fixation.
  • Adjuvant treatment of Pseudo-Bennett fracture with vitamin C is suggested for the prevention of disproportionate pain
  • The medial epicondylar fractures should be immobilized for 7 days with patients elbow flexed at 90º, with the pronated forearm , and the flexed wrist at 30º for relaxing the common flexor-pronator muscle group. If more than 3 mm of displacement is present or the fragment is trapped in the medial joint, attempts at closed reduction often fail, and ORIF is necessary.
  • Lateral epicondylar fractures should be immobilized for 7 days with patients elbow flexed at 90º, with the supinated forearm , and the extended wrist for relaxing the extensor muscles.

Complications of Non-surgical therapy

Failure of non-surgical therapy is common:

  • Re-displacement to its original position even in a cast
  • Stiffness
  • Post traumatic osteoarthritis leading to wrist pain and loss of function
  • Other risks specific to cast treatment include:

Surgery

Returning to the normal physical activity after Pseudo-Bennett fracturecan take weeks to months of therapy under supervision an orthopedist. Meanwhile, a physiotherapy can be helpful for patient to achieve the normal wrist and elbow function caused by the immobilisation. All adult Pseudo-Bennett fracture should be considered to be treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). As an important fact the following-mentioned cases require surgical intervention:

  • Angulation higher than 30°
  • Displacement
  • Intra-articular extension

External fixation: For severe open fractures Open reduction and internal fixation: For Pseudo-Bennett fractures which depending on each patients condition the following may be needed:

Ulnar nerve placement Bone grafting Osteotomy Arthrodesis

Operation

  • There are a variety of methods and implants useful to stabilize the Pseudo-Bennett fracture, ranging from closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation to the use of intra-medullary devices.
  • However, the most common fixation methods to treat complex Pseudo-Bennett fracture include external fixation, and open reduction and internal fixation.

External Fixation With or Without Percutaneous Pin Fixation

  • Wrist spanning external fixation employs ligamentotaxis to restore and maintain length, alignment, and rotation of thumb bone.
  • Reduction is typically obtained through closed or minimally open methods and preserves the fracture biology.
  • The addition of percutaneous pins enhances the ability to reduce and stabilize fracture fragments.

Complications of External Fixation

Open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws

  • This is the most common type of surgical repair for Pseudo-Bennett fracture
  • During this type of procedure, the bone fragments are first repositioned (reduced) into their normal alignment.
  • The bones held together with special screws and metal plates attached to the outer surface of the bone.

Complications of open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws =

  • Infection
  • Damage to nerves and blood vessels
  • Synostosis
  • Nonunion

Pain Management

Pain after an injury or surgery is a natural part of the healing process.

Medications are often prescribed for short-term pain relief after surgery or an injurysuch as:

  • opioids
  • non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
  • local anesthetics

Be aware that although opioids help relieve pain after surgery or an injury, they are a narcotic and can be addictive.  It is important to use opioids only as directed by doctor.

Interventions

The following options can be helpful for patients to rehabilitate after their fracture :

  • Joints mobilization
  • compression bandage
  • Soft tissue massage
  • Exercises and Activity modification
  • Forearm taping
  • Forearm bracing

Postoperative Rehabilitation

  • Complex Pseudo-Bennett fracture warrant individualized immobilization and rehabilitation strategies.
  • Similarly, the addition of a thumb spica cast or orthosis with positioning of the wrist in slight ulnar deviation for management of a comminuted radial column fracture may prevent loss of reduction. *Because most multifragmentary Pseudo-Bennett fracture are the result of high-energy injuries, a prolonged period of wrist immobilization and soft-tissue rest may be beneficial and has not been shown to affect clinical outcomes.
  • The wrist is typically immobilized for 2 weeks post-operatively in a sugar tong splint with neutral forearm rotation.
  • At 6 weeks post-operatively, the wrist is placed into a removable orthosis, and active and passive range of motion (ROM) is initiated.
  • Full weight bearing commences at approximately 3 months post-operatively after consolidation of the fracture is noted on radiographs.
  • The presence of varying degrees of hand, wrist, and elbow stiffness is inevitable and may result from poor pain control, lack of effort in controlled mobilization, edema, concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity fractures, or peripheral nerve injuries.
  • Early stretching and mobilization of the intrinsic and extrinsic tendons of the hand is important to prevent finger stiffness.
  • Edema control can be initiated with compression gloves, digital massage, and active and passive ROM of the hand.
  • A home exercise program or outpatient occupational therapy is started immediately post-operatively to maintain full range of motion of the hand and limit the development of intrinsic muscle tightness

Primary Prevention

There are various preventive options to reduce the incidence of the Pseudo-Bennett fracture

  1. Using forearm and wrist guards during practicing sports (skating, biking)
  2. Using forearm and wrist guards during driving motorbikes
  3. Avoid falls in elderly individuals
  4. Prevention and/or treatment of osteoporosis
  5. Healthy diet

Secondary Prevention

It should be noted that the Post-menopausal women specially older than the age of 65 are at the higher risk of osteoporosis consequently these type of patients at greater risk for the pathological fractures .

So the Calcium and vitamin D supplementation play important role in increasing the bone mineral density (BMD) consequently decrease the risk of fracture in these type of patients. Also, avoiding excessive alcohol and quitting smoking play important role in this regard.

Detecting osteoporosis

Pharmacological therapy

Life style modifications

Template:WH Template:WS

See also

References

External links

Template:Fractures Template:WikiDoc Sources