Spontaneous coronary artery dissection natural history, complications and prognosis: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Spontaneous coronary artery dissection}}
{{Spontaneous coronary artery dissection}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}}{{NRM}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{NRM}} {{AKK}}


{{SK}} SCAD
{{SK}} SCAD


==Overview==
==Overview==
 
The [[natural history]] of [[spontaneous coronary artery dissection]] has not been well characterized.  Early reports based on [[autopsy|post-mortem examinations]] after [[sudden cardiac death]] suggest a dismal [[prognosis]].  However, recent studies demonstrate that the majority of [[patients]] survive initial hospitalization and have a favorable [[prognosis]] following clinical stabilization. Some of the [[complications]] of [[SCAD]] include extension of [[dissection]], recurrence of [[dissection]], [[myocardial stunning]], [[myocardial infarction]], [[congestive heart failure]], [[cardiogenic shock]], [[ventricular arrhythmia]], and [[Sudden death|sudden cardiac death]].
 


==Natural History, Complications and Prognosis==
==Natural History, Complications and Prognosis==
Line 13: Line 12:
===Natural History===
===Natural History===


The fact that the diagnosis was made so often in the past on autopsy speaks to the poor clinical outcomes that have been associated with the condition. Outcomes in the modern era of [[stent]] placement and improved [[antithrombin]]s may be improved, but solid data are lacking. Based on the limited outcomes data, SCAD survivors typically have a good long-term prognosis. Majority of cases result in spontaneous healing, with improvement starting after several weeks and resolution at approximately 1-2 years.<ref name="pmid24227590">{{cite journal| author=Saw J| title=Coronary angiogram classification of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. | journal=Catheter Cardiovasc Interv | year= 2014 | volume= 84 | issue= 7 | pages= 1115-22 | pmid=24227590 | doi=10.1002/ccd.25293 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24227590  }} </ref> However, there is an increased risk for recurrent SCAD events as well as other major cardiovascular events.<ref name="Tweet-2012">{{Cite journal | last1 = Tweet | first1 = MS. | last2 = Hayes | first2 = SN. | last3 = Pitta | first3 = SR. | last4 = Simari | first4 = RD. | last5 = Lerman | first5 = A. | last6 = Lennon | first6 = RJ. | last7 = Gersh | first7 = BJ. | last8 = Khambatta | first8 = S. | last9 = Best | first9 = PJ. | title = Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. | journal = Circulation | volume = 126 | issue = 5 | pages = 579-88 | month = Jul | year = 2012 | doi = 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718 | PMID = 22800851 }}</ref>
*The natural history of [[spontaneous coronary artery dissection]] ([[SCAD]]) has not been well characterized.
*Early reports based on [[autopsy|post-mortem examinations]] and small case series suggest a dismal [[prognosis]], with [[sudden cardiac death]] as the initial presentation in 28% of cases and an [[in-hospital mortality]] of 49%.<ref name="KolleCliffe1998">{{cite journal|last1=Kolle|first1=Patrick T.|last2=Cliffe|first2=Charles M.|last3=Ridley|first3=David J.|title=Immunosuppressive therapy for peripartum-type spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Case report and review|journal=Clinical Cardiology|volume=21|issue=1|year=1998|pages=40–46|issn=01609289|doi=10.1002/clc.4960210108}}</ref>
* In contrast, data from recent studies demonstrate that the majority of [[SCAD]] [[lesions]] [[heal]] spontaneously over time and achieve complete resolution on repeat [[angiography]] within one month among stabilized [[patients]] who survive initial [[hospitalization]].<ref name="SawAymong2014">{{cite journal|last1=Saw|first1=J.|last2=Aymong|first2=E.|last3=Sedlak|first3=T.|last4=Buller|first4=C. E.|last5=Starovoytov|first5=A.|last6=Ricci|first6=D.|last7=Robinson|first7=S.|last8=Vuurmans|first8=T.|last9=Gao|first9=M.|last10=Humphries|first10=K.|last11=Mancini|first11=G. B. J.|title=Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Association With Predisposing Arteriopathies and Precipitating Stressors and Cardiovascular Outcomes|journal=Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions|volume=7|issue=5|year=2014|pages=645–655|issn=1941-7640|doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760}}</ref><ref name="RogowskiMaeder2017">{{cite journal|last1=Rogowski|first1=Sebastian|last2=Maeder|first2=Micha T.|last3=Weilenmann|first3=Daniel|last4=Haager|first4=Philipp K.|last5=Ammann|first5=Peter|last6=Rohner|first6=Franziska|last7=Joerg|first7=Lucas|last8=Rickli|first8=Hans|title=Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection|journal=Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions|volume=89|issue=1|year=2017|pages=59–68|issn=15221946|doi=10.1002/ccd.26383}}</ref> 
*The risk of recurrence has been reported in 10 to 30% of cases with a 3- to 10-year follow-up from different series that adopted a non-[[revascularization]] management approach.<ref name="SawAymong2014">{{cite journal|last1=Saw|first1=J.|last2=Aymong|first2=E.|last3=Sedlak|first3=T.|last4=Buller|first4=C. E.|last5=Starovoytov|first5=A.|last6=Ricci|first6=D.|last7=Robinson|first7=S.|last8=Vuurmans|first8=T.|last9=Gao|first9=M.|last10=Humphries|first10=K.|last11=Mancini|first11=G. B. J.|title=Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Association With Predisposing Arteriopathies and Precipitating Stressors and Cardiovascular Outcomes|journal=Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions|volume=7|issue=5|year=2014|pages=645–655|issn=1941-7640|doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760}}</ref><ref name="TweetHayes2012">{{cite journal|last1=Tweet|first1=M. S.|last2=Hayes|first2=S. N.|last3=Pitta|first3=S. R.|last4=Simari|first4=R. D.|last5=Lerman|first5=A.|last6=Lennon|first6=R. J.|last7=Gersh|first7=B. J.|last8=Khambatta|first8=S.|last9=Best|first9=P. J. M.|last10=Rihal|first10=C. S.|last11=Gulati|first11=R.|title=Clinical Features, Management, and Prognosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection|journal=Circulation|volume=126|issue=5|year=2012|pages=579–588|issn=0009-7322|doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718}}</ref><ref name="TweetEleid2014">{{cite journal|last1=Tweet|first1=M. S.|last2=Eleid|first2=M. F.|last3=Best|first3=P. J. M.|last4=Lennon|first4=R. J.|last5=Lerman|first5=A.|last6=Rihal|first6=C. S.|last7=Holmes|first7=D. R.|last8=Hayes|first8=S. N.|last9=Gulati|first9=R.|title=Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Revascularization Versus Conservative Therapy|journal=Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions|volume=7|issue=6|year=2014|pages=777–786|issn=1941-7640|doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659}}</ref><ref name="NakashimaNoguchi2016">{{cite journal|last1=Nakashima|first1=Takahiro|last2=Noguchi|first2=Teruo|last3=Haruta|first3=Seiichi|last4=Yamamoto|first4=Yusuke|last5=Oshima|first5=Shuichi|last6=Nakao|first6=Koichi|last7=Taniguchi|first7=Yasuyo|last8=Yamaguchi|first8=Junichi|last9=Tsuchihashi|first9=Kazufumi|last10=Seki|first10=Atsushi|last11=Kawasaki|first11=Tomohiro|last12=Uchida|first12=Tatsuro|last13=Omura|first13=Nobuhiro|last14=Kikuchi|first14=Migaku|last15=Kimura|first15=Kazuo|last16=Ogawa|first16=Hisao|last17=Miyazaki|first17=Shunichi|last18=Yasuda|first18=Satoshi|title=Prognostic impact of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report from the Angina Pectoris–Myocardial Infarction Multicenter Investigators in Japan|journal=International Journal of Cardiology|volume=207|year=2016|pages=341–348|issn=01675273|doi=10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.188}}</ref><ref name="SawHumphries2017">{{cite journal|last1=Saw|first1=Jacqueline|last2=Humphries|first2=Karin|last3=Aymong|first3=Eve|last4=Sedlak|first4=Tara|last5=Prakash|first5=Roshan|last6=Starovoytov|first6=Andrew|last7=Mancini|first7=G.B. John|title=Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection|journal=Journal of the American College of Cardiology|volume=70|issue=9|year=2017|pages=1148–1158|issn=07351097|doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053}}</ref>


===Complications===
===Complications===


Complications include:
Complications include:
* Extension of dissection(s)
* Extension of [[dissection]]
* Recurrent dissection(s)
* Recurrence of [[dissection]]
* [[Myocardial stunning]]
* [[Myocardial infarction]]
* [[Myocardial infarction]]
* [[Congestive heart failure]]
* [[Congestive heart failure]]
* Unstable [[ventricular arrhythmia]]s
* [[Cardiogenic shock]]
* [[Ventricular arrhythmia]]
* [[Sudden death|Sudden cardiac death]]
* [[Sudden death|Sudden cardiac death]]
*Iatrogenic catheter-induced [[coronary artery dissection]] (prevalence of 3.4%, compared with <0.2% for standard [[coronary angiography]])<ref name="PrakashStarovoytov2016">{{cite journal|last1=Prakash|first1=Roshan|last2=Starovoytov|first2=Andrew|last3=Heydari|first3=Milad|last4=Mancini|first4=G.B. John|last5=Saw|first5=Jacqueline|title=Catheter-Induced Iatrogenic Coronary Artery Dissection in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection|journal=JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions|volume=9|issue=17|year=2016|pages=1851–1853|issn=19368798|doi=10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.026}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal
| author = [[Hany Awadalla]], [[Sameh Sabet]], [[Ashraf El Sebaie]], [[Oscar Rosales]] & [[Richard Smalling]]
| title = Catheter-induced left main dissection incidence, predisposition and therapeutic strategies experience from two sides of the hemisphere
| journal = [[The Journal of invasive cardiology]]
| volume = 17
| issue = 4
| pages = 233–236
| year = 2005
| month = April
| pmid = 15831980
}}</ref>


===Prognosis===
===Prognosis===


Good prognosis is associated with:
* Long-term survival after an index [[SCAD]] episode appears to be better compared with that of [[acute coronary syndrome|acute coronary syndrome (ACS)]].
* Small, limited dissections
* The rate of [[major adverse cardiac events]] ([[MACE]]) is comparable between post-[[SCAD]] and post-[[ACS]] settings.
* Incomplete or lesser degree of lumen obstruction
* The rates of in-hospital [[myocardial infarction]] and long-term [[MACE]] were 4.5% and 20%, respectively.<ref name="pmid25294399">{{cite journal| author=Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D et al.| title=Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes. | journal=Circ Cardiovasc Interv | year= 2014 | volume= 7 | issue= 5 | pages= 645-55 | pmid=25294399 | doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25294399  }} </ref>
 
* Unsuccessful [[percutaneous coronary intervention]] ([[PCI]]) was observed in approximately one-third of cases.<ref name="pmid25406203">{{cite journal| author=Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJ, Lennon RJ, Lerman A, Rihal CS et al.| title=Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy. | journal=Circ Cardiovasc Interv | year= 2014 | volume= 7 | issue= 6 | pages= 777-86 | pmid=25406203 | doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25406203  }} </ref>
Bad prognosis is associated with:
* [[In-hospital]] [[prognosis]] was better in the conservative treatment group when compared with patients managed with [[PCI]].<ref name="pmid25294399">{{cite journal| author=Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D et al.| title=Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes. | journal=Circ Cardiovasc Interv | year= 2014 | volume= 7 | issue= 5 | pages= 645-55 | pmid=25294399 | doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25294399  }} </ref><ref name="pmid22800851">{{cite journal| author=Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ et al.| title=Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. | journal=Circulation | year= 2012 | volume= 126 | issue= 5 | pages= 579-88 | pmid=22800851 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22800851  }} </ref>
* [[Left main coronary artery]] involvement
* A large cohort with a median follow-up of 3.1 years reported a post-discharge [[MACE]] rate of 19.9% (approximately 6 events/100 person-years), with [[myocardial infarction]] (16.8%) and recurrent [[SCAD]] (10.4%) as the most frequent events.<ref name="SawHumphries2017">{{cite journal|last1=Saw|first1=Jacqueline|last2=Humphries|first2=Karin|last3=Aymong|first3=Eve|last4=Sedlak|first4=Tara|last5=Prakash|first5=Roshan|last6=Starovoytov|first6=Andrew|last7=Mancini|first7=G.B. John|title=Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection|journal=Journal of the American College of Cardiology|volume=70|issue=9|year=2017|pages=1148–1158|issn=07351097|doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053}}</ref>
* Multi-vessel involvement
 
Long term survival after an index SCAD episode appears to be better compared with that of [[acute coronary syndrome]]. However, rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) resulting from index episode and complications are similar.In the current literature, the prognosis of SCAD has been determined according to the small case series including different treatment options. According to a recent 168 patient-cohort study, in hospital MI rate was 4.5% and long term major adverse coronary events have been reported as 20%.
 


==References==
==References==
Line 44: Line 55:
[[Category:Angiographic Definitions]]
[[Category:Angiographic Definitions]]
[[Category:Disease]]
[[Category:Disease]]
[[Category:Up-to-date]]

Latest revision as of 20:00, 28 April 2021

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous coronary artery dissection from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Approach

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Angiography

CT

MRI

Echocardiography

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Treatment Approach

Medical Therapy

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Type 1

Type 2A

Type 2B

Type 3

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A. Arzu Kalayci, M.D. [2]

Synonyms and keywords: SCAD

Overview

The natural history of spontaneous coronary artery dissection has not been well characterized. Early reports based on post-mortem examinations after sudden cardiac death suggest a dismal prognosis. However, recent studies demonstrate that the majority of patients survive initial hospitalization and have a favorable prognosis following clinical stabilization. Some of the complications of SCAD include extension of dissection, recurrence of dissection, myocardial stunning, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Natural History

Complications

Complications include:

Prognosis

References

  1. Kolle, Patrick T.; Cliffe, Charles M.; Ridley, David J. (1998). "Immunosuppressive therapy for peripartum-type spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Case report and review". Clinical Cardiology. 21 (1): 40–46. doi:10.1002/clc.4960210108. ISSN 0160-9289.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Saw, J.; Aymong, E.; Sedlak, T.; Buller, C. E.; Starovoytov, A.; Ricci, D.; Robinson, S.; Vuurmans, T.; Gao, M.; Humphries, K.; Mancini, G. B. J. (2014). "Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Association With Predisposing Arteriopathies and Precipitating Stressors and Cardiovascular Outcomes". Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 7 (5): 645–655. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760. ISSN 1941-7640.
  3. Rogowski, Sebastian; Maeder, Micha T.; Weilenmann, Daniel; Haager, Philipp K.; Ammann, Peter; Rohner, Franziska; Joerg, Lucas; Rickli, Hans (2017). "Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection". Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 89 (1): 59–68. doi:10.1002/ccd.26383. ISSN 1522-1946.
  4. Tweet, M. S.; Hayes, S. N.; Pitta, S. R.; Simari, R. D.; Lerman, A.; Lennon, R. J.; Gersh, B. J.; Khambatta, S.; Best, P. J. M.; Rihal, C. S.; Gulati, R. (2012). "Clinical Features, Management, and Prognosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection". Circulation. 126 (5): 579–588. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718. ISSN 0009-7322.
  5. Tweet, M. S.; Eleid, M. F.; Best, P. J. M.; Lennon, R. J.; Lerman, A.; Rihal, C. S.; Holmes, D. R.; Hayes, S. N.; Gulati, R. (2014). "Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Revascularization Versus Conservative Therapy". Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 7 (6): 777–786. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659. ISSN 1941-7640.
  6. Nakashima, Takahiro; Noguchi, Teruo; Haruta, Seiichi; Yamamoto, Yusuke; Oshima, Shuichi; Nakao, Koichi; Taniguchi, Yasuyo; Yamaguchi, Junichi; Tsuchihashi, Kazufumi; Seki, Atsushi; Kawasaki, Tomohiro; Uchida, Tatsuro; Omura, Nobuhiro; Kikuchi, Migaku; Kimura, Kazuo; Ogawa, Hisao; Miyazaki, Shunichi; Yasuda, Satoshi (2016). "Prognostic impact of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report from the Angina Pectoris–Myocardial Infarction Multicenter Investigators in Japan". International Journal of Cardiology. 207: 341–348. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.188. ISSN 0167-5273.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Saw, Jacqueline; Humphries, Karin; Aymong, Eve; Sedlak, Tara; Prakash, Roshan; Starovoytov, Andrew; Mancini, G.B. John (2017). "Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 70 (9): 1148–1158. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053. ISSN 0735-1097.
  8. Prakash, Roshan; Starovoytov, Andrew; Heydari, Milad; Mancini, G.B. John; Saw, Jacqueline (2016). "Catheter-Induced Iatrogenic Coronary Artery Dissection in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection". JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 9 (17): 1851–1853. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.026. ISSN 1936-8798.
  9. Hany Awadalla, Sameh Sabet, Ashraf El Sebaie, Oscar Rosales & Richard Smalling (2005). "Catheter-induced left main dissection incidence, predisposition and therapeutic strategies experience from two sides of the hemisphere". The Journal of invasive cardiology. 17 (4): 233–236. PMID 15831980. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  10. 10.0 10.1 Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D; et al. (2014). "Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes". Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 7 (5): 645–55. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760. PMID 25294399.
  11. Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJ, Lennon RJ, Lerman A, Rihal CS; et al. (2014). "Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy". Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 7 (6): 777–86. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659. PMID 25406203.
  12. Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ; et al. (2012). "Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection". Circulation. 126 (5): 579–88. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718. PMID 22800851.