Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests

Revision as of 21:26, 15 November 2017 by Sudarshana Datta (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pancreatic cancer Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pancreatic Cancer from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Staging

Diagnostic study of choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests

CDC on Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests

Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests in the news

Blogs on Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pancreatic cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pancreatic cancer laboratory tests

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Sudarshana Datta, MD [2]

Overview

Laboratory findings in pancreatic cancer patients are often non specific and include abnormal liver function tests, elevated serum bilirubin levels (conjugated and total), elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and mild normocytic normochromic anemia. Patients may have evidence of malnutrition and elevated CA 19-9 levels.

Laboratory Findings

CA 19-9

Role in prognosis:

  • Preoperative values above 50 U/mL have higher recurrence.
  • High levels indicate poorer outcome and low chance of resectability

Role in treatment:

  • To determine the resectability potential, CA 19-9 levels are used as an adjunct to imaging studies.
  • Staging laproscopy prior to resection is not required in patients presenting with low levels of CA 19-9 (< 100 IU) as they are unlikely to have occult metastatic disease.

Role in assessing response to treatment:

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources