Gynecomastia classification

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gynecomastia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Gynecomastia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Gynecomastia classification On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Gynecomastia classification

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Gynecomastia classification

CDC on Gynecomastia classification

Gynecomastia classification in the news

Blogs on Gynecomastia classification

Directions to Hospitals Treating Gynecomastia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Gynecomastia classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [2]

Overview

Gynecomastia may be classified into 11 classification syste,ms based on a total of 10 breast characteristics

  • Breast size
  • skin redundancy
  • skin elasticity
  • Breast ptosis
  • Tissue predominance
  • Upper Abdominal Laxity
  • Nipple malposition
  • Tuberosity
  • Chest shape and Absence of sternal notch
  • Breast Skin Elasticity

Classification

First Author Year Method of classification Classification system
Simon 1973 Physical
  • GRADE 1: Small visible breast enlargement, no skin redundancy
  • GRADE 2a: Moderate breast enlargement without skin redundancy
  • GRADE 2b: Moderate breast enlargement with skin redundancy
  • GRADE 3: Marked breast enlargement with marked skin redundancy
Rohrich 2003 Physical/Tissue type
  • GRADE 1 : Minimal hyperteophy, (less than 250g of tissue) without ptosis
    • 1a : Primary glandular
    • 1b : Primarily fibrous
  • GRADE 2 : moderate hypertrophy (250-500g of breast tissue) without ptosis
    • 2a : Primarily glandular
    • 2b : primarily fibrous
  • GRADE 3 : Severe hypertrophy (>500g of breast tissue with grade 1 ptosis glandular or fibrous
  • GRADE 4 : Severe hypertrophy with grade 1 or 3 ptosis glandular or fibrous
Gusenoff 2008 Physical
  • GRADE 1: Minimal excess skin and fat, minimal alteration of NAC, normal IMF
    • 1a: No lateral skin roll
    • 1b: Lateral skin roll Grade
    • 2: NAC and IMF below the ideal IMF, lateral chest roll, minimal upper abdominal laxity
  • GRADE 3: NAC and IMF below the ideal IMF, lateral chest roll, significant upper abdominal laxity.
Barros 2012 Physical
  • GRADE I: Increased diameter and slight protrusion limited to the areola region
  • GRADE II: Moderate hypertrophy of the breast with the NAC above the IMF
  • GRADE III: Major hypertrophy of the breast with glandular ptosis and the NAC situated at the same height as or as much as 1 cm below the IMF Grade IV: Major breast hypertrophy with skin redundancy, severe ptosis, and the NAC positioned ≥1 cm below the IMF
Çi̇l 2012 Imaging (computed tomography Gynecomastic adipose tissue/total gynecomastic tissue, <0.3 Gynecomastic adipose tissue/total gynecomastic tissue, 0.3–0.5 Gynecomastic adipose tissue/total gynecomastic tissue, >0.6
Cordova 2008 Physical
  • GRADE I: Increase in diameter and protrusion limited to the areolar region
  • GRADE II: Hypertrophy of all the structural components of the breast; the NAC is above the IMF
  • GRADE III: Hypertrophy of all the structural components, NAC at the same height as or approximately 1 cm below the IMF; in this group we can also include male tuberous breast
  • GRADE IV: Hypertrophy of all the structural components, NAC >1 cm below the IMF
Fruhstorfer 2003 Physical Small-to-moderate Moderate-to-large
Mladick 2004 Physical No sagging Slight sagging Moderate sagging Extensive sagging
Monarca 2013 Physical/tis- sue type
  • GRADE I: Minimal hypertrophy (<250 g)
    • IA: Primarily fatty breast tissue
    • IB: Primarily fibrous breast tissue
    • IC: Nipple malposition (upright)
    • ID: Gynoid (rounded) shape of the chest
    • IE: Absence of sternal notch II: Moderate hypertrophy (250–500 g)
  • GRADE IIA: Primarily fatty breast tissue
    • IIB: Primarily fibrous breast tissue with peripheral fat
    • IIC: Nipple malposition (upright or upward)
    • IID: Moderate gynoid shape of the chest
    • IIE: Absence of sternal notch
  • GRADE III: Severe hypertrophy with grade I ptosis (>500 g)
    • IIIA: Fatty and fibrous tissue with ptosis of grade I
    • IIIB: Nipple malposition (upright or upward)
    • IIIC: Severe gynoid shape of the chest
    • IIID: Absence of sternal notch
  • Grade IV: Severe hypertrophy with grade II or III ptosis (>500–700 g) IVA: Fatty and fibrous tissue with ptosis of grade II
    • IVB: Fatty and fibrous tissue with ptosis of with nipple reorientation grade III
    • IVC: Nipple malposition (upright or upward)
    • IVD: Severe gynoid shape of the chest
    • IVE: Absence of sternal notch

The spectrum of gynecomastia severity has been categorized into a grading system:[1][2]

  • Grade I: Minor enlargement, no skin excess
  • Grade II: Moderate enlargement, no skin excess
  • Grade III: Moderate enlargement, skin excess
  • Grade IV: Marked enlargement, skin excess

References

  1. Wollina, U; Goldman, A (June 2011). "Minimally invasive esthetic procedures of the male breast". Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 10 (2): 150–155. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00548.x. PMID 21649820.
  2. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973). "Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia". Plast Reconstr Surg. 51 (1): 48–52. PMID 4687568.

Template:WH Template:WS