Diabetes mellitus type 1 screening: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


==Screening==
==Screening==
According to the American diabetic association] screening for type 1 DM is not recommended. However, one should consider referring relatives of those with type 1 diabetes for antibody testing for risk assessment in the setting of a [http://www2&#x20;.diabetestrialnet.org&#x20;clinical&#x20;research&#x20;study&#x20;clincal&#x20;study clinical research]. Higher-risk individuals may be tested, but only in the context of a clinical research setting.<ref name=":0" />  
* According to the American diabetic association screening for type 1 DM is not recommended. However, one should consider referring relatives of those with type 1 diabetes for antibody testing for risk assessment in the setting of a [http://www2&#x20;.diabetestrialnet.org&#x20;clinical&#x20;research&#x20;study&#x20;clincal&#x20;study clinical research]. Higher-risk individuals may be tested, but only in the context of a clinical research setting.<ref name=":0" />  
* Based on some studies, [[screening]] for [[diabetes mellitus type 1|diabetic]] [[patient|patients]] has some favorable effects. The following table is a summary of [[screening]] effects based on 6 pediatric studies:<ref name="pmid22060727">{{cite journal| author=Winkler C, Schober E, Ziegler AG, Holl RW| title=Markedly reduced rate of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in relatives screened for islet autoantibodies. | journal=Pediatr Diabetes | year= 2012 | volume= 13 | issue= 4 | pages= 308-13 | pmid=22060727 | doi=10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00829.x | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22060727  }} </ref><ref name="pmid21972409">{{cite journal| author=Elding Larsson H, Vehik K, Bell R, Dabelea D, Dolan L, Pihoker C | display-authors=etal| title=Reduced prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in young children participating in longitudinal follow-up. | journal=Diabetes Care | year= 2011 | volume= 34 | issue= 11 | pages= 2347-52 | pmid=21972409 | doi=10.2337/dc11-1026 | pmc=3198296 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21972409  }} </ref><ref name="pmid24823816">{{cite journal| author=Lundgren M, Sahlin Å, Svensson C, Carlsson A, Cedervall E, Jönsson B | display-authors=etal| title=Reduced morbidity at diagnosis and improved glycemic control in children previously enrolled in DiPiS follow-up. | journal=Pediatr Diabetes | year= 2014 | volume= 15 | issue= 7 | pages= 494-501 | pmid=24823816 | doi=10.1111/pedi.12151 | pmc=4190091 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24823816  }} </ref><ref name="pmid28127835">{{cite journal| author=Steck AK, Larsson HE, Liu X, Veijola R, Toppari J, Hagopian WA | display-authors=etal| title=Residual beta-cell function in diabetes children followed and diagnosed in the TEDDY study compared to community controls. | journal=Pediatr Diabetes | year= 2017 | volume= 18 | issue= 8 | pages= 794-802 | pmid=28127835 | doi=10.1111/pedi.12485 | pmc=5529265 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=28127835  }} </ref>
{| class="wikitable"
!Study
!'''Less DKA'''
!'''Lower HbA1c'''
!'''Lower insulin dose'''
!'''Shorter hospitalization period'''
|-
|BABYDIAB and Munich
| +
| +
| -
| +
|-
|DiPiS
| +
| +
| -
|Not determined
|-
|TEDDY
| +
| +
| +
|Not determined
|-
|DAISY
| +
| +
| +
| +
|-
|DIPP
| +
| +
|Not determined
|Not determined
|}


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}
Line 15: Line 54:
{{WS}}
{{WS}}


[[Category:Needs content]]
[[Category:Screening]]
[[Category:Endocrinology]]
[[Category:Endocrinology]]
[[Category:Emergency medicine]]
[[Category:Emergency medicine]]

Revision as of 15:11, 11 September 2020

Diabetes mellitus main page

Diabetes mellitus type 1 Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Classification

Causes

Differentiating Diabetes mellitus type 1 from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural history, Complications, and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Dietary Management

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Strategies for Improving Care

Foundations of Care and Comprehensive Medical Evaluation

Diabetes Self-Management, Education, and Support
Nutritional Therapy

Glycemic Targets

Approaches to Glycemic Treatment

Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management

Hypertension and Blood Pressure Control
Lipid Management
Antiplatelet Agents
Coronary Heart Disease

Microvascular Complications and Foot Care

Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Footcare

Older Adults with Diabetes

Children and Adolescents with Diabetes

Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents with Diabetes
Microvascular Complications in Children and Adolescents with Diabetes

Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy

Diabetes Care in the Hospital Setting

Primary Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Diabetes mellitus Main page

Patient Information

Type 1
Type 2

Overview

Classification

Diabetes mellitus type 1
Diabetes mellitus type 2
Gestational diabetes

Differential Diagnosis

Complications

Screening

Diagnosis

Prevention

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vishal Devarkonda, M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

According to the American Diabetic Association, screening for type 1 DM is not recommended.[1]

Screening

  • According to the American diabetic association screening for type 1 DM is not recommended. However, one should consider referring relatives of those with type 1 diabetes for antibody testing for risk assessment in the setting of a clinical research. Higher-risk individuals may be tested, but only in the context of a clinical research setting.[1]
  • Based on some studies, screening for diabetic patients has some favorable effects. The following table is a summary of screening effects based on 6 pediatric studies:[2][3][4][5]
Study Less DKA Lower HbA1c Lower insulin dose Shorter hospitalization period
BABYDIAB and Munich + + - +
DiPiS + + - Not determined
TEDDY + + + Not determined
DAISY + + + +
DIPP + + Not determined Not determined


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/suppl/2015/12/21/39.Supplement_1.DC2/2016-Standards-of-Care.pdf
  2. Winkler C, Schober E, Ziegler AG, Holl RW (2012). "Markedly reduced rate of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in relatives screened for islet autoantibodies". Pediatr Diabetes. 13 (4): 308–13. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00829.x. PMID 22060727.
  3. Elding Larsson H, Vehik K, Bell R, Dabelea D, Dolan L, Pihoker C; et al. (2011). "Reduced prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in young children participating in longitudinal follow-up". Diabetes Care. 34 (11): 2347–52. doi:10.2337/dc11-1026. PMC 3198296. PMID 21972409.
  4. Lundgren M, Sahlin Å, Svensson C, Carlsson A, Cedervall E, Jönsson B; et al. (2014). "Reduced morbidity at diagnosis and improved glycemic control in children previously enrolled in DiPiS follow-up". Pediatr Diabetes. 15 (7): 494–501. doi:10.1111/pedi.12151. PMC 4190091. PMID 24823816.
  5. Steck AK, Larsson HE, Liu X, Veijola R, Toppari J, Hagopian WA; et al. (2017). "Residual beta-cell function in diabetes children followed and diagnosed in the TEDDY study compared to community controls". Pediatr Diabetes. 18 (8): 794–802. doi:10.1111/pedi.12485. PMC 5529265. PMID 28127835.

Template:WH Template:WS