Dyspepsia classification

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dyspepsia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Dyspepsia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Dyspepsia classification On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Dyspepsia classification

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Dyspepsia classification

CDC on Dyspepsia classification

Dyspepsia classification in the news

Blogs on Dyspepsia classification

Directions to Hospitals Treating Dyspepsia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Dyspepsia classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Fahad Hasan, M.D.[2] Ajay Gade MD[3]]

Overview

Dyspepsia is a symptom complex referring to chronic or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen, including epigastric pain or burning, postprandial fullness, and early satiety. Contemporary classification has moved away from the older dichotomy of "ulcer" versus "non-ulcer" dyspepsia. Patients are now categorized along a three-tier framework: uninvestigated dyspepsia (symptoms present but no diagnostic workup yet performed), organic (secondary) dyspepsia (an identifiable structural, H. pylori-related, metabolic, or drug-induced cause is found), and functional dyspepsia (FD) (no explanatory organic disease is found on evaluation, including a normal upper endoscopy). Functional dyspepsia, as redefined by the Rome IV criteria, is further split into postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), which frequently overlap.[1] More than 70% of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia ultimately meet criteria for functional dyspepsia rather than organic disease.[2]

Classification

Dyspepsia is classified according to whether a diagnostic evaluation has been performed and, if so, whether it reveals structural or biochemical disease.

Uninvestigated Dyspepsia

Organic (Secondary) Dyspepsia

  • Organic dyspepsia accounts for approximately 20-30% of all dyspepsia cases and is present when investigation reveals a structural, infectious, or biochemical explanation for symptoms.
  • Recognized causes include peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastric or esophageal cancer, pancreatic or biliary disease, medication-induced dyspepsia (e.g., NSAIDs), and H. pylori-associated disease.
  • Endoscopy is abnormal or another investigation identifies the causative lesion.
  • The 2015 Kyoto Global Consensus Report designated H. pylori'-associated dyspepsia as a distinct clinicopathological entity, separate from functional dyspepsia, defined by dyspeptic symptoms attributable to H. pylori gastritis that resolve or improve following successful eradication; this entity should be excluded before a diagnosis of FD is assigned.[4]

Functional Dyspepsia (Rome IV Criteria)

  • Functional dyspepsia (FD) is now defined by the Rome IV criteria (superseding Rome III), which require the presence of one or more of the following symptoms, bothersome enough to interfere with usual activities, with onset at least 6 months before diagnosis and symptoms active for the last 3 months: postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, or epigastric burning — with no evidence of structural disease (including a normal upper endoscopy) to explain the symptoms.[1]
  • Patients with predominant heartburn or reflux symptoms should be evaluated for GERD, and a coexisting reflux diagnosis does not exclude FD given the high rate of overlap between the two conditions.
  • FD is subdivided into two, frequently overlapping, subtypes:
Subtype Defining symptoms (Rome IV) Frequency threshold
Postprandial Distress Syndrome (PDS) Bothersome postprandial fullness or early satiation that prevents finishing a regular-sized meal ≥3 days/week
Epigastric Pain Syndrome (EPS) Bothersome epigastric pain or epigastric burning, not exclusively postprandial and often unrelated to meals ≥1 day/week
  • Compared with Rome III, the Rome IV criteria significantly reduce diagnostic overlap between PDS and EPS; when patients with any postprandial symptom are classified as PDS, overlap falls to less than 20%.[5]
  • There is no evidence that symptom subtype (PDS versus EPS) predicts differential response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and subtype should not by itself be used to select treatment.[5]
  • Proposed pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to FD include:
    • Impaired gastric accommodation and delayed gastric emptying (motor dysfunction)
    • Visceral hypersensitivity
    • Low-grade duodenal eosinophilic inflammation and impaired mucosal integrity
    • Helicobacter pylori infection (when symptoms persist despite eradication, this is classified as FD rather than H. pylori-associated dyspepsia)
    • Psychosocial factors, anxiety, and depression, consistent with FD's status as a disorder of gut-brain interaction

Overlap with Other Disorders

  • FD commonly overlaps with gastroesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In patients clinically fulfilling Rome IV criteria for FD, GERD-FD overlap is more common than either disorder alone, PDS overlaps with GERD more than EPS does, and organic dyspepsia is uncommon in this population.[6]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Stanghellini V, Chan FK, Hasler WL, Malagelada JR, Suzuki H, Tack J, Talley NJ (2016). "Gastroduodenal Disorders". Gastroenterology. 150 (6): 1380–1392. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.011. PMID 27147122.
  2. Lacy BE, Talley NJ, Locke GR, Bouras EP, DiBaise JK, El-Serag HB, Vela MF, Camilleri M, Freeman J, Khicha M, Fernandez y Fernandez M (2012). "Review article: current treatment options and management of functional dyspepsia". Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 36 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05128.x. PMID 22591037.
  3. Moayyedi P, Lacy BE, Andrews CN, Enns RA, Howden CW, Vakil N (2017). "ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia". Am J Gastroenterol. 112 (7): 988–1013. doi:10.1038/ajg.2017.154. PMID 28631728.
  4. Sugano K, Tack J, Kuipers EJ, Graham DY, El-Omar EM, Miura S, Haruma K, Asaka M, Uemura N, Malfertheiner P (2015). "Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis". Gut. 64 (9): 1353–1367. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252. PMID 26187502.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Black CJ, Paine PA, Agrawal A, Aziz I, Eugenicos MP, Houghton LA, Hungin P, Overshott R, Vasant DH, Rudd S, Winning RC, Corsetti M, Ford AC (2022). "British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of functional dyspepsia". Gut. 71 (9): 1697–1723. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327737. PMID 35798375 Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. Quach DT, Nguyen TA, Cao N, Hiep PS, Dinh KT, Pham T, Vo T, Nguyen VT, Ho D (2022). "Overlap of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Dyspepsia and Yield of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients Clinically Fulfilling the Rome IV Criteria for Functional Dyspepsia". Front Med (Lausanne). 9: 910929. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.910929. PMID 35783630 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)

Template:WH Template:WS