Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{ADI}} {{SCh}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{SCh}}


==Overview==
==Overview==

Revision as of 20:22, 14 February 2017

Peritonitis main page

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology in the news

Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivani Chaparala M.B.B.S [2]

Overview

SBP is a result of culmination of the inability of the gut to contain bacteria and failure of the immune system to eradicate the organisms once they have escaped into the blood stream.[1][2][3] Factors related to cirrhosis and ascites predispose to the development of SBP, they include : altered microbial flora, hypo-motility of the intestine, intestinal bacterial overgrowth, increased Intestinal mucosal permeability, bacterial translocation to lymph nodes. Presence of ascites appears to be an important risk factor for the development of bacterial translocation. In healthy individuals, bacteria that colonize lymph nodes are killed by local immune defenses. However, in cirrhosis and aquired state of immunodeficiency, the following changes in the immune defences can be present : malfunctioning of the reticulo-endothelial and neutrophilic system, reduced cellular and humoral bactericidal function which favor the spread of bacteria to the blood stream. Bacteremia in healthy individuals results in rapid coating by IgG and/or Complement components and removal of the bacteria by neutrophils in the circulation. In cirrhosis, decreased serum levels of complement components (C3, C4), impaired chemotaxis, poor function and phagocytic activity of neutrophils, decreased function of Fc-gamma-receptors in macrophages, hepatic Reticuloendothelial system (RES) dysfunction, with reduced Kupffer cells, intrahepatic and extra porto systemic shunts prevent circulating bacteria from encountering the kupper cells and impaired neutrophilic function result in decreased immune response and clearance of the bacteria. The consequence of these abnormalities is prolongation of bacteremia and eventual seeding of other sites, including the ascitic fluid. The presence of bacteria in ascitic fluid does not consititute to peritonitis without signs and symptoms. Ascitic fluid due to cirrhosis can mount a humoral self-defense with the help of complement system. Patients with adequate activity of this vital bactericidal system do not develop ascitic fluid infections. Patients with ascitic fluid C3 less than1g/dl and a protein level less than 1g/dl have an increased predisposition to SBP. Low complement levels result in inadequate killing of the bacteria lead to the development of infection. Finally, Bacteremia/ Endotoxemia leads to activation of cytokine cascade and release effector molecules such as NO and TNF casuing vasodilation and reduced renal perfusion.

Pathophysiology

 
 
Patients with decompensated cirrhosis leading to portal Hypertension[4][5]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intestinal hypo-motility and local pro-inflammatory phenomenon[6]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bacterial overgrowth:
Increased intestinal permeability and decreased local and systemic immune system in cirrhosis and its relation to bacterial infections and prognosis. [6][7][8]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Routes of entry of pathogens into the ascitic fluid
Escape of enteric bacteria to systemic circulation through:[9]
❑ Bacterial translocation[5]
• Luminal bacteria within colonize mesenteric lymph nodes.[10]
• Organisms from the mesenteric lymph nodes → Systemic circulation through thoracic duct lymph → percolates through the liver and weep across Glisson's capsule → Ascitic fluid.
• Transient bacteremia → Prolonged bacteremia ( due to ↓ Reticulo endothelial system activity ) → Ascites Colonization ( due to ↓ ascitic fluid bactericidal activity ) → Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis )
❑ Portal Vein
• Porto-systemic shunt
• ↓RES function in the liver
❑ Lymphatic rupture
• Contaminated lymph carried by lymphatics
• Ruptured Lymphatics due to high flow and high pressure associated with portal hypertension ( BACTERASCITES )[11]
❑ Other source of organisms
• IV catheters, skin, urinary, and respiratory tract
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Endotoxemia and Cytokine response
❑ Endotoxemia → release of pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by macrophages and other host cells in response to bacteria in the serum and peritoneal exudate
Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)
Interleukin (IL)-1,6
Interferon-γ (IFN-γ)
Soluble adhesion molecules
❑ Systemic and Abdominal manifestations of peritonitis mediated by cytokines[12][2]
• The effector molecules (Nitric oxide) and cytokines,Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) that help kill the bacteria have undesired side effects as they cause vasodilation and renal failure that accompany SBP.[13][12][14]
• Studies have shown that the presence of whole bacteria or DNA, in serum and ascitic fluid leads to stimulation of immune defences, effector molecules, and cytokines which in turn impact on hemodynamics, renal function and survival.[13]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Host response
❑ Local response

Outpouring of fluid into the peritoneal cavity at sites of irritation with:

• High protein content (>3 g/dL)
• Many cells, primarily polymorphonuclear leukocytes, that phagocytose and kill organisms
• Formation of Fibrinous exudate on the inflamed peritoneal surfaces → Adhesion formation between adjacent bowel, mesentery, and omentum
• Localization of the inflammatory process is aided further by inhibition of motility in the involved intestinal loops
• The extent and rate of intraperitoneal spread of contamination depend on the volume and nature of the exudate and on the effectiveness of the localizing processes
• If peritoneal defenses aided by the appropriate supportive measures control the inflammatory process, the disease may resolve spontaneously (Sterile ascites)[1][1][11] → Consumption of humoral bactericidal factors due to frequent colonization → Increased susceptibility to SBP[15]
• If the ascitic fluid bactericidal activity is poor-moderate → Culture negative neutrocytic ascites (CNNA) or SBP → delay / inappropriate treatment → death due to sepsis and multi organ failure.[16][17]
• Second possible outcome is a confined abscess
• A third possible outcome results when the peritoneal and systemic defense mechanisms are unable to localize the inflammation, which progresses to spreading diffuse peritonitis due to increased virulence of bacteria, greater extent and duration of contamination, and impaired host defenses.
❑ Systemic response

Gastrointestinal

Paralysis of the bowel due to local inflammation
• Progressive accumulation of fluid and electrolytes in the lumen of the adynamic bowel → distention of the bowel → inhibition of the capillary inflow and secretions
• GI bleeding because of excessive inflammation and tissue damage → ↑ vasodilatation and ↓organ perfusion

Cardiovascular

• Shift of fluid into the peritoneal cavity and bowel lumen → ↓ Effective circulating blood volume → ↑ Hematocrit and
• ↑Fluid and electrolyte loss by coexistent fever, vomiting, diarrhea → decreased venous return to the right side of the heart → decrease in cardiac outputhypotension → activation of the sympathetic nervous system and manifestations such as sweating, tachycardia, and cutaneous vasoconstriction (i.e., cold, moist skin and mottled, cyanotic extremities).
• If the blood volume replaced is sufficient enough as so to increase the cardiac output 2-3 times normal ( to satisfy the increased metabolic needs of the body in the presence of infection) a halt in the progression of the disease is seen.
• Failure to sustain increased cardiac output results in progressive lactic acidosis, oliguria, hypotension, and ultimately death if the infection cannot be controlled.

Respiratory

Intra-peritoneal inflammation → high and fixed diaphragm → pain on respiration → basilar atelectasis with intrapulmonary shunting of blood
• Decompensation of respiratory function due to delay in the intervention → hypoxemia + hypo-capnia (respiratory alkalosis) followed by hypercapnia (respiratory acidosis)
Pulmonary edema results because of increased pulmonary capillary leakage as a consequence of hypo-albuminemia or direct effects of bacterial toxins (adult respiratory distress syndrome) → progressive hypoxemia with decreasing pulmonary compliance which needs a ventilator assistance with increasingly higher concentrations of inspired oxygen and positive end-expiratory pressure.

Renal

• SBP → Splanchnic arterial vasodilation and systemic vascular resistance → ↓ Effective arterial blood volume → stimulation of systemic vasoconstrictors (RAAS, Sympathetic Nervous System, Arginine vasopressin) → renal vasoconstriction
• Advanced cirrhosis → ↓ production of local vasodilators and ↑ production of local vasoconstrictors[12] → Hepatorenal syndrome and death.[2]
• ↓ Organ perfusion → Ischemic and Toxic Acute Tubular NecrosisAcute Renal Failure → Death in (30-40%) of patients.

Metabolic

Infection → ↓body stores of Glycogen → catabolism of protein (muscle) and →extreme wasting and rapid weight loss of severely infected patients
• Infection → ↓Body heat production → exhaustion and death

Central nervous system

Hepatic Encephalopathy may occur due to inflammation, Oxidative stress and Intestinal ammonia production on crossing the blood-brain barrieraltered mentation.

Hematological

SepsisDIC
 



Diagramatic representation of pathological bacterial translocation and the associated host response

Bacterial Translocation

It is defined as the translocation of either bacteria or bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), bacterial DNA, peptidoglycans, muramyl-dipeptides from gut into mesenteric lymph nodes.[18]

Physiological: It is the normal bacterial translocation in healthy individuals due to lack of pro-inflammatory responses against commensal bacteria. Physiological translocation is crucial for the development of host immunity response.

Pathological: It is developed due to abnormal increase in physiological translocation in both rate and degree by breaking the normal immunological barriers.

Barriers that limit pathological transmission:

  1. Interstinal lumen and it's secretory components such as inner and outer mucus layer, antimicrobial peptides: This is the primary barrier that limit direct contact between the intestinal bacteria and the epithelial cell surface
  2. Epithelial barrier with the gut-associated lymphatic tissue (GALT) and autonomic nervous system: This is a mechanical barrier with local immunological response elements (e.g., TNF and other pro-inflammatory cytokines) that rapidly detects and kill the pathogen that manage to penetrate.[19]
  3. Systemic immune system: This includes hematogenous (portal venous) and lymphatic (ductus thoracicus) route of delivery that acts as a third immune barrier to prevent or minimize the pathogen to disseminate systemically from local immune system such as lymph nodes.

Mechanism of pathological bacterial translocation

Breaking these immune barriers can progress physiological bacterial translocation into pathological bacterial translocation.

Bacterial Translocation

Adapted from Journal of hepatology:Pathological bacterial translocation in liver cirrhosis.[20]

I. Immune response by

gut associated lymphoid tissue

A. Innate immunity Innate immunity is the first line of defense mechanism against invading pathogen that detects common bacterial motifs such as microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) through germline-coded pattern-recognition receptors (PRR) on intestinal cells.[21]

Mechanism of breaking of innate immunity

  1. Dendritic cells below the epithelial layer allows pathogen via dendritic processes with out affecting tight junction function.
  2. Disruption of epithelial barrier by antigenic properties of the pathogen with the underlying epithelial layer and compromises its epithelial integrity.
  3. Access provided by M- cells overlying payers patches with in the villous epithelium through antigen presenting cells.[22]
B. Adaptive immunity Bacterial translocation through epithelial cells

Release of chemokines form epithelial cells.[23]

Recruitment of dendritic cells towards mucosa

Dendritic cells induces adaptive immunity through mucosal B and T lymphocytes[24]

a. Bacterial antigen present to Matured T lymphocytes, followed by activation B-lymphocytes through T helper cells

b. Antigen presenting cells present microbial antigen to matured B lymphocytes, eventually B-cell releases IgA mucosal immunoglobulins against pathogen and it's product

Mechanism of breaking adaptive immunity: Due to the underlying immunocompromised states such as cirrhosis, there is a depletion of both T and B cells and hypogamaglobilinemia, results in weak development of adaptive immunity with insufficient bacterial killing that leads to lethal dissemination of commensal bacteria.[25][26][27][28]

II. Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) In a healthy gut, dendritic cells transport pathological bacteria to mesenteric lymph nodes which induces local immune response and are killed without inducing systemic immunity.

In immunocompromised state, lack of local immune response by MLN is reduced, eventually permits the translocation of intestinal bacteria systemically, which eventually may lead to sepsis and death.

Mechanism involving in spreading bacteria beyond MLN:[8][29]

  • Deficient innate and adaptive immunity
  • Impaired chemotactic, opsonic, phagocytic activity of macropharges
  • Impaired RES activity
III. Systemic immune response Translocation beyond MLN through hematogenous or lymphatic path is specific and depends on the microbial-specific systemic immune response.[30] Lymphatic and portalvenous route in parallel are disrupt in liver cirrhosis which results in dissemination of bacterial pathogen.
  • Contrary to earlier theories, transmucosal migration of bacteria from the gut to the ascitic fluid is no longer considered to play a major role in the etiology of SBP.[16][3]
  • As for the significance of ascitic fluid proteins, it was demonstrated that cirrhotic patients with ascitic protein concentrations below 1 g/dL were 10 times more likely to develop SBP than individuals with higher concentrations. It is thought that the antibacterial, or opsonic, activity of ascitic fluid is closely correlated with the protein concentration. Additional studies have confirmed the validity of the ascitic fluid protein concentration as the best predictor of the first episode of SBP.[31][32][1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Runyon BA, Morrissey RL, Hoefs JC, Wyle FA (1985). "Opsonic activity of human ascitic fluid: a potentially important protective mechanism against spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Hepatology. 5 (4): 634–7. PMID 4018735.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Runyon BA (2004). "Early events in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Gut. 53 (6): 782–4. PMC 1774068. PMID 15138202.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Sheer TA, Runyon BA (2005). "Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Dig Dis. 23 (1): 39–46. doi:10.1159/000084724. PMID 15920324.
  4. Llach J, Rimola A, Navasa M, Ginès P, Salmerón JM, Ginès A; et al. (1992). "Incidence and predictive factors of first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis with ascites: relevance of ascitic fluid protein concentration". Hepatology. 16 (3): 724–7. PMID 1505916.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Cirera I, Bauer TM, Navasa M, Vila J, Grande L, Taurá P; et al. (2001). "Bacterial translocation of enteric organisms in patients with cirrhosis". J Hepatol. 34 (1): 32–7. PMID 11211904.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Chang CS, Chen GH, Lien HC, Yeh HZ (1998). "Small intestine dysmotility and bacterial overgrowth in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Hepatology. 28 (5): 1187–90. doi:10.1002/hep.510280504. PMID 9794900.
  7. {{cite journal| author=Bauer TM, Steinbrückner B, Brinkmann FE, Ditzen AK, Schwacha H, Aponte JJ et al.| title=Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with cirrhosis: prevalence and relation with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. | journal=Am J Gastroenterol | year= 2001 | volume= 96 | issue= 10 | pages= 2962-7 | pmid=11693333 | doi=10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04668.x | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=11693333
  8. 8.0 8.1 Rimola A, Soto R, Bory F, Arroyo V, Piera C, Rodes J (1984). "Reticuloendothelial system phagocytic activity in cirrhosis and its relation to bacterial infections and prognosis". Hepatology. 4 (1): 53–8. PMID 6693068.
  9. Wiest R, Garcia-Tsao G (2005). "Bacterial translocation (BT) in cirrhosis". Hepatology. 41 (3): 422–33. doi:10.1002/hep.20632. PMID 15723320.
  10. Runyon BA, Squier S, Borzio M (1994). "Translocation of gut bacteria in rats with cirrhosis to mesenteric lymph nodes partially explains the pathogenesis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". J Hepatol. 21 (5): 792–6. PMID 7890896.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Ho H, Zuckerman MJ, Ho TK, Guerra LG, Verghese A, Casner PR (1996). "Prevalence of associated infections in community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Am J Gastroenterol. 91 (4): 735–42. PMID 8677940.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Such J, Hillebrand DJ, Guarner C, Berk L, Zapater P, Westengard J; et al. (2001). "Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and nitric oxide in sterile ascitic fluid and serum from patients with cirrhosis who subsequently develop ascitic fluid infection". Dig Dis Sci. 46 (11): 2360–6. PMID 11713936.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Dunn DL, Barke RA, Knight NB, Humphrey EW, Simmons RL (1985). "Role of resident macrophages, peripheral neutrophils, and translymphatic absorption in bacterial clearance from the peritoneal cavity". Infect Immun. 49 (2): 257–64. PMC 262007. PMID 3894229.
  14. Navasa, Miguel; Follo, Antonio; Filella, Xavier; Jiménez, Wladimiro; Francitorra, Anna; Planas, Ramón; Rimola, Antoni; Arroyo, Vicente; Rodés, Joan (1998). "Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: Relationship with the development of renal impairment and mortality". Hepatology. 27 (5): 1227–1232. doi:10.1002/hep.510270507. ISSN 0270-9139.
  15. Titó L, Rimola A, Ginès P, Llach J, Arroyo V, Rodés J (1988). "Recurrence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: frequency and predictive factors". Hepatology. 8 (1): 27–31. PMID 3257456.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Runyon BA (1988). "Patients with deficient ascitic fluid opsonic activity are predisposed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Hepatology. 8 (3): 632–5. PMID 3371881.
  17. Runyon BA, Hoefs JC (1984). "Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites: a variant of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Hepatology. 4 (6): 1209–11. doi:10.1002/hep.1840040619. PMID 6500513.
  18. Berg RD, Garlington AW (1979) Translocation of certain indigenous bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the mesenteric lymph nodes and other organs in a gnotobiotic mouse model. Infect Immun 23 (2):403-11. PMID: 154474
  19. Tsiaoussis GI, Assimakopoulos SF, Tsamandas AC, Triantos CK, Thomopoulos KC (2015). "Intestinal barrier dysfunction in cirrhosis: Current concepts in pathophysiology and clinical implications". World J Hepatol. 7 (17): 2058–68. doi:10.4254/wjh.v7.i17.2058. PMC 4539399. PMID 26301048.
  20. "Pathological bacterial translocation in liver cirrhosis".
  21. Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T (2001) Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat Immunol 2 (8):675-80. DOI:10.1038/90609 PMID: 11477402
  22. Hase K, Kawano K, Nochi T, Pontes GS, Fukuda S, Ebisawa M et al. (2009) Uptake through glycoprotein 2 of FimH(+) bacteria by M cells initiates mucosal immune response. Nature 462 (7270):226-30. DOI:10.1038/nature08529 PMID: 19907495
  23. Girón-González JA, Rodríguez-Ramos C, Elvira J, Galán F, Del Alamo CF, Díaz F; et al. (2001). "Serial analysis of serum and ascitic fluid levels of soluble adhesion molecules and chemokines in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis". Clin Exp Immunol. 123 (1): 56–61. PMC 1905962. PMID 11167998.
  24. Muñoz L, José Borrero M, Ubeda M, Lario M, Díaz D, Francés R et al. (2012) Interaction between intestinal dendritic cells and bacteria translocated from the gut in rats with cirrhosis. Hepatology 56 (5):1861-9. DOI:10.1002/hep.25854 PMID: 22611024
  25. Kirkland D, Benson A, Mirpuri J, Pifer R, Hou B, DeFranco AL et al. (2012) B cell-intrinsic MyD88 signaling prevents the lethal dissemination of commensal bacteria during colonic damage. Immunity 36 (2):228-38. DOI:10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.019 PMID: 22306056
  26. Doi H, Iyer TK, Carpenter E, Li H, Chang KM, Vonderheide RH et al. (2012) Dysfunctional B-cell activation in cirrhosis resulting from hepatitis C infection associated with disappearance of CD27-positive B-cell population. Hepatology 55 (3):709-19. DOI:10.1002/hep.24689 PMID: 21932384
  27. Gautreaux MD, Deitch EA, Berg RD (1994) T lymphocytes in host defense against bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun 62 (7):2874-84. PMID: 7911786
  28. Owens WE, Berg RD (1980) Bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract of athymic (nu/nu) mice. Infect Immun 27 (2):461-7. PMID: 6966611
  29. Trevisani F, Castelli E, Foschi FG, Parazza M, Loggi E, Bertelli M; et al. (2002). "Impaired tuftsin activity in cirrhosis: relationship with splenic function and clinical outcome". Gut. 50 (5): 707–12. PMC 1773217. PMID 11950821.
  30. Macpherson AJ, Gatto D, Sainsbury E, Harriman GR, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM (2000). "A primitive T cell-independent mechanism of intestinal mucosal IgA responses to commensal bacteria". Science. 288 (5474): 2222–6. PMID 10864873.
  31. 31.0 31.1 Alaniz C, Regal RE (2009) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a review of treatment options. P T 34 (4):204-10. PMID: 19561863
  32. Runyon BA (1986) Low-protein-concentration ascitic fluid is predisposed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology 91 (6):1343-6. PMID: 3770358

Template:WH Template:WS