Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acute promyelocytic leukemia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Acute promyelocytic leukemia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Other Imaging Studies

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary PreventionSurgery

Secondary PreventionSurgery

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective

CDC on Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective

Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Acute promyelocytic leukemia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Acute promyelocytic leukemia historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Shyam Patel [2]

Historical perspective

  • In 1957, acute promyelocytic leukemia was described as a distinct clinical condition for the first time. It was noted that this condition carried a high mortality rate due to severe hemorrhage.[1]
  • In 1973, clinical studies showed the therapeutic efficacy of daunorubicin, an chemotherapy agent of the anthracycline class. This medication was shown to induce remission in the majority of patients, with an increase in remission rate from 13% to 58%. The median duration of remission with daunorubicin was more than 2 years. Compared to 6-mercaptopurine, daunorubicin was shown to reduce mortality from bleeding after 5 days.[1]
  • In the early 1990s, it was noted that arsenic trioxide could induce remission in a high proportion of patients.[1]
  • In 1995, D. Head and colleagues showed that higher remission rates and higher survival rates could be achieved with higher doses of daunorubicin, with a survival rate of 61% after 9 years and a 0% relapse after 36 months.[2]
  • In 2013, LoCoco and colleagues showed that, in a randomized phase 3 multicenter clinical trial, a non-chemotherapy-based regimen was superior to a chemotherapy-based regimen for low-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia.[3] Specifically, the combination of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide resulted in improved overall survival compared to the combination of all-trans retinoic acid plus chemotherapy. This landmark clinical trial, which was conducted by the Italian and German-Austrian Leukemia Study Groups, altered the treatment paradigm for low-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia.[3]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Coombs CC, Tavakkoli M, Tallman MS (2015). "Acute promyelocytic leukemia: where did we start, where are we now, and the future". Blood Cancer J. 5: e304. doi:10.1038/bcj.2015.25. PMC 4450325. PMID 25885425.
  2. Head D, Kopecky KJ, Weick J, Files JC, Ryan D, Foucar K; et al. (1995). "Effect of aggressive daunomycin therapy on survival in acute promyelocytic leukemia". Blood. 86 (5): 1717–28. PMID 7655004.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lo-Coco F, Avvisati G, Vignetti M, Thiede C, Orlando SM, Iacobelli S; et al. (2013). "Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia". N Engl J Med. 369 (2): 111–21. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300874. PMID 23841729.

Template:WH Template:WS