Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach

Jump to: navigation, search

Editor(s)-In-Chief: The APEX Trial Investigators, C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2] ; Kashish Goel, M.D.; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Justine Cadet

Deep vein thrombosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Classification

Pathophysiology

Differentiating Deep vein thrombosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Approach

Pretest Probability

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Ultrasound

Venography

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Specific Situations

Treatment

Treatment Approach

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Landmark Trials

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach

CDC on Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach

Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach in the news

Blogs on Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach</small>

Directions to Hospitals Treating Deep vein thrombosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach

Diagnostic Approach

A number of invasive (venography) and non-invasive tests (impedance plethysmography, compression ultrasonography, D-dimer testing) are available for diagnosis. Compression ultrasonography is the noninvasive diagnosis of choice for patients with a first episode of a suspected DVT.

In a patient population with a high prevalence of VTE, a negative D-dimer assay may be insufficient to rule out DVT as a single test, furthermore, not all D-dimer assays are validated for this. However, a D-dimer level <500 ng/mL by ELISA along with a low clinical probability (Wells score)[1] or other negative non-invasive tests may be useful in excluding DVT, without doing ultrasound. Independent studies validate the Wells 10 point rule.[2][3] However, the d-dimer assays vary; for rapid quantitative immunoturbidimetric assays, a cutoff of 1.0 <g/mL is used.[2]

Compression ultrasonography has a positive predictive value of 94 percent (95% CI: 87-98 percent). If the clinical suspicion of DVT is high even after a negative CUS, a repeat study should be done within a week. Complete lower extremity ultrasonography may eliminate the need for repeat testing, but a positive CUS demands user expertise, and requires specialized instrumentation. The algorithm below presents a possible diagnostic approach.

DVT diagnosis.jpg

CUS stands for Compression Ultrasonography; D-dimer is the highly sensitive assay. Clinical judgement and local availability should be considered in patients with a moderate probability of DVT. CUS may be preferred in patients with comorbid conditions associated with elevated D-dimer levels.

Adapted from ACCP guidelines[4].

Considerations

  • Whole-leg ultrasound may be preferred in those who have severe symptoms of calf DVT or are unable to come for serial testing.
  • CT scan venography, MR venography, or MR direct thrombus imaging may be used in those patients in whom ultrasound is not practical (leg cast, excessive edema) or non-diagnostic.
  • The diagnostic approach may be modified based on clinical condition of the patient and specific situations.

References

  1. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J (March 2000). "Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer". Thromb. Haemost. 83 (3): 416–20. PMID 10744147. Retrieved on 2012-05-01.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Linkins LA, Bates SM, Lang E, Kahn SR, Douketis JD, Julian J et al. (2013). "Selective d-Dimer Testing for Diagnosis of a First Suspected Episode of Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Randomized Trial.". Ann Intern Med 158 (2): 93-100. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-00003. PMID 23318311.
  3. van der Velde EF, Toll DB, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Oudega R, Stoffers HE, Bossuyt PM et al. (2011). "Comparing the diagnostic performance of 2 clinical decision rules to rule out deep vein thrombosis in primary care patients.". Ann Fam Med 9 (1): 31-6. doi:10.1370/afm.1198. PMID 21242558.
  4. Bates SM, Jaeschke R, Stevens SM, et al. (February 2012). "Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines". Chest 141 (2 Suppl): e351S–418S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2299. PMID 22315267.

Navigation WikiDoc | WikiPatient | Popular pages | Recently Edited Pages | Recently Added Pictures

Table of Contents In Alphabetical Order | By Individual Diseases | Signs and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Lab Tests | Drugs

Editor Tools Become an Editor | Editors Help Menu | Create a Page | Edit a Page | Upload a Picture or File | Printable version | Permanent link | Maintain Pages | What Pages Link Here
There is no pharmaceutical or device industry support for this site and we need your viewer supported Donations | Editorial Board | Governance | Licensing | Disclaimers | Avoid Plagiarism | Policies
Linked-in.jpg
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox