Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Upper gastrointestinal bleeding}} {{CMG}}; {{AE}} ==Overview== There are no other imaging findings associated with [disease name]. OR [Imaging modality] may b...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Upper gastrointestinal bleeding}}
{{Upper gastrointestinal bleeding}}
 
{{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADG}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}}  
 
==Overview==
==Overview==
There are no other imaging findings associated with [disease name].


OR
==Other Imaging Findings==
In cases where the source of bleeding is unidentified after upper endoscopy, the utilization of subsequent diagnostic modalities depends upon the hemodynamic stability of the patient. Other diagnostic studies include:<ref name="pmid6604219">{{cite journal |vauthors=Steer ML, Silen W |title=Diagnostic procedures in gastrointestinal hemorrhage |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=309 |issue=11 |pages=646–50 |year=1983 |pmid=6604219 |doi=10.1056/NEJM198309153091106 |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid3094466">{{cite journal |vauthors=Browder W, Cerise EJ, Litwin MS |title=Impact of emergency angiography in massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding |journal=Ann. Surg. |volume=204 |issue=5 |pages=530–6 |year=1986 |pmid=3094466 |pmc=1251335 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid2334015">{{cite journal |vauthors=Hunter JM, Pezim ME |title=Limited value of technetium 99m-labeled red cell scintigraphy in localization of lower gastrointestinal bleeding |journal=Am. J. Surg. |volume=159 |issue=5 |pages=504–6 |year=1990 |pmid=2334015 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
*CT angiography
*Catheter angiography
*Radionuclide imaging
{| class="wikitable"
!
!CT angiography
!Catheter angiography
!Radionuclide imaging
|-
|Bleeding at rates
detection
|At least 0.5 mL/min
|0.5 to 1.5 mL/min
|0.1 mL/min
|-
|Indications
|
* Hemodynamically stable
* Endoscopy undiagnostic
|
* Endoscopy not feasible due to severe bleeding with hemodynamic instability


[Imaging modality] may be helpful in the diagnosis of [disease name]. Findings on an [imaging modality] suggestive of/diagnostic of [disease name] include [finding 1], [finding 2], and [finding 3].
* Persistent or recurrent GI bleeding
* Non-diagnostic upper endoscopy
|
|-
|Advantages
|
* Minimally invasive 


==Other Imaging Findings==
* Demonstrate neoplasms or vascular malformations
*There are no other imaging findings associated with [disease name].


*[Imaging modality] may be helpful in the diagnosis of [disease name]. Findings on an [imaging modality] suggestive of/diagnostic of [disease name] include:
* Can provide evidence of recent bleeding
**[Finding 1]
|
**[Finding 2]
* Diagnostic and therapeutic
**[Finding 3]
* Allows for infusion of vasoconstrictive drugs and/or embolization.
* Does not require bowel preparation. 
|
* Most sensitive imaging modality for GI bleeding
* More commonly utilized for investigation of patients with obscure, intermittent bleeding
|-
|Disadvantages
|
* Lacks therapeutic capability
* Risk of contrast induced nephropathy in patients with renal impairment and contrast allergy
|
* Access-site hematoma or pseudoaneurysm
* Arterial dissection
* Spasm, bowel ischemia
* Contrast-induced nephropathy or allergic reaction
|
* Poor anatomic localization of the bleeding site
* Unable to diagnose the pathological cause of GI bleeding
|}


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 17:45, 6 November 2017

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Management

Initial resuscitation
Pharmacotherapy
Risk stratification

Surgery

Surgical Management
Endoscopic Intervention

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Guidelines for Management

Case Studies

Case #1

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings

CDC on Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings in the news

Blogs on Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Risk calculators and risk factors for Upper gastrointestinal bleeding other imaging findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Other Imaging Findings

In cases where the source of bleeding is unidentified after upper endoscopy, the utilization of subsequent diagnostic modalities depends upon the hemodynamic stability of the patient. Other diagnostic studies include:[1][2][3]

  • CT angiography
  • Catheter angiography
  • Radionuclide imaging
CT angiography Catheter angiography Radionuclide imaging
Bleeding at rates

detection

At least 0.5 mL/min 0.5 to 1.5 mL/min 0.1 mL/min
Indications
  • Hemodynamically stable
  • Endoscopy undiagnostic
  • Endoscopy not feasible due to severe bleeding with hemodynamic instability
  • Persistent or recurrent GI bleeding
  • Non-diagnostic upper endoscopy
Advantages
  • Minimally invasive 
  • Demonstrate neoplasms or vascular malformations
  • Can provide evidence of recent bleeding
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic
  • Allows for infusion of vasoconstrictive drugs and/or embolization.
  • Does not require bowel preparation. 
  • Most sensitive imaging modality for GI bleeding
  • More commonly utilized for investigation of patients with obscure, intermittent bleeding
Disadvantages
  • Lacks therapeutic capability
  • Risk of contrast induced nephropathy in patients with renal impairment and contrast allergy
  • Access-site hematoma or pseudoaneurysm
  • Arterial dissection
  • Spasm, bowel ischemia
  • Contrast-induced nephropathy or allergic reaction
  • Poor anatomic localization of the bleeding site
  • Unable to diagnose the pathological cause of GI bleeding

References

  1. Steer ML, Silen W (1983). "Diagnostic procedures in gastrointestinal hemorrhage". N. Engl. J. Med. 309 (11): 646–50. doi:10.1056/NEJM198309153091106. PMID 6604219.
  2. Browder W, Cerise EJ, Litwin MS (1986). "Impact of emergency angiography in massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding". Ann. Surg. 204 (5): 530–6. PMC 1251335. PMID 3094466.
  3. Hunter JM, Pezim ME (1990). "Limited value of technetium 99m-labeled red cell scintigraphy in localization of lower gastrointestinal bleeding". Am. J. Surg. 159 (5): 504–6. PMID 2334015.

Template:WH Template:WS