Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Management

Initial resuscitation
Pharmacotherapy
Risk stratification

Surgery

Surgical Management
Endoscopic Intervention

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Guidelines for Management

Case Studies

Case #1

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification

CDC on Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification in the news

Blogs on Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification

Directions to Hospitals Treating Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Risk calculators and risk factors for Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Two scoring systems identify those at risk for adverse outcomes from UGIB which include Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) and Rockall score. Glasgow Blatchford score is most commonly used and is more accurate.

Risk stratification

Two scoring systems identify those at risk for adverse outcomes from UGIB:[1]

  • The Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS)
  • The Rockall score

The Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS)

GBS is the more effective system for predicting the need for transfusion in patients with UGIB:

The Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS)
Admission risk markers Score
Blood urea nitrogen level (mg/dl)   ≥ 18.2 to < 22.4 2
  ≥ 22.4 to < 28 3
≥ 28 to < 70 4
  ≥ 70 6
Hemoglobin level (g/dl) Men    ≥ 12 to < 13 1
  ≥ 10 to < 12 3
< 10 6
Women    ≥ 10 to < 12 1
 < 10 6
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)    ≥ 100 to < 109 1
 ≥ 90 to < 99 2
  < 90 3
Other markers Pulse rate ≥ 100 beats/min 1
Presentation with melena 1
Presentation with syncope 2
Hepatic disease 2
Heart failure 2
Interpratation of score 0-2 Low-risk group
>6 High risk group

The Rockall score

The complete Rockall score identifies those patients with evidence of acute UGIB on endoscopy who are at low risk for further bleeding or death.[4][5]

The Rockall score
Markers Score
Age <60 0
60 - 79 1
≥ 80 2
Shock stage Blood pressure >120 0
100-119 1
<100 2
Heart rate >100 0
<100 1
Comorbidity No major comorbidity 0
Cardiac failure

Ischemic heart disease

Any major comorbidity

2
Renal failure

Liver failure

Disseminated malignancy

3
Diagnosis Mallory-Weiss tear, no lesion identified and no SRH 0
All other diagnosis 1
Malignancy of upper GI tract 2
Major SRH None or dark spot only 0
Blood in upper GI tract, adherent clot,
visible or spurting vessel
2
Interpratation of score

(Range of score is 0-11)

Score of ≤ 3 Low mortality risk
Score of ≥ 8 High mortality risk
GI: Gastrointestinal, SRH: Signs of recent hemorrhage

References

  1. Ebrahimi Bakhtavar H, Morteza Bagi HR, Rahmani F, Shahsavari Nia K, Ettehadi A (2017). "Clinical Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding; a Narrative Review". Emerg (Tehran). 5 (1): e36. PMC 5325906. PMID 28286843.
  2. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M (2000). "A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage". Lancet. 356 (9238): 1318–21. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02816-6. PMID 11073021.
  3. Stanley AJ (2012). "Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage". World J. Gastroenterol. 18 (22): 2739–44. doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i22.2739. PMC 3374976. PMID 22719181.
  4. Monteiro S, Gonçalves TC, Magalhães J, Cotter J (2016). "Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?". World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 7 (1): 86–96. doi:10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.86. PMC 4753192.
  5. Atkinson RJ, Hurlstone DP (2008). "Usefulness of prognostic indices in upper gastrointestinal bleeding". Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 22 (2): 233–42. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2007.11.004. PMID 18346681.