Patent foramen ovale medical therapy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
==Overview==
==Overview==


There is a lack of consensus on the medical therapy for [[patent foramen ovale]]. Asymptomatic [[patent foramen ovale]] doesn't warrant any treatment. The incidence of recurrent [[stroke]] in patients with index episode of [[Paradoxical embolism|cryptogenic stroke]] and treated with [[aspirin]] or [[warfarin]] has been found similar in presence or absence of a [[patent foramen ovale]]. However, an increased risk of subsequent [[stroke]] in has been seen in [[patent foramen ovale]] associated with atrial septal aneurysm. Thus, treatment with [[aspirin]] or [[warfarin]] could be considered in patients with [[patent foramen ovale]] and atrial septal abnormalities. There are lack of studies to compare the efficacy of [[aspirin]] and [[warfarin]], however [[aspirin]]'s safety profile has been found to be better than [[warfarin]].
There is a lack of consensus on the medical therapy for [[patent foramen ovale]]. Asymptomatic [[patent foramen ovale]] doesn't warrant any treatment. The incidence of recurrent [[stroke]] in patients with index episode of [[Paradoxical embolism|cryptogenic stroke]] and treated with [[aspirin]] or [[warfarin]] has been found similar in presence or absence of a [[patent foramen ovale]]. However, an increased risk of subsequent [[stroke]] has been seen in [[patent foramen ovale]] associated with atrial septal aneurysm. Thus, treatment with [[aspirin]] or [[warfarin]] could be considered in patients with [[patent foramen ovale]] associated with atrial septal abnormalities. There are lack of studies to compare the efficacy of [[aspirin]] and [[warfarin]], however [[aspirin]]'s safety profile has been found to be better than [[warfarin]].


=='''Internatioanl guidelines for prevention of recurrent cerebral embolism in patent foramen ovale '''==
=='''Internatioanl guidelines for prevention of recurrent cerebral embolism in patent foramen ovale '''==

Revision as of 00:31, 6 September 2011

Patent Foramen Ovale Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Patent Foramen Ovale from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

PFO and Stroke

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Patent foramen ovale medical therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Patent foramen ovale medical therapy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Patent foramen ovale medical therapy

CDC on Patent foramen ovale medical therapy

Patent foramen ovale medical therapy in the news

Blogs on Patent foramen ovale medical therapy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Patent foramen ovale

Risk calculators and risk factors for Patent foramen ovale medical therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editors-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [2]; Assistant Editor-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [3]

Overview

There is a lack of consensus on the medical therapy for patent foramen ovale. Asymptomatic patent foramen ovale doesn't warrant any treatment. The incidence of recurrent stroke in patients with index episode of cryptogenic stroke and treated with aspirin or warfarin has been found similar in presence or absence of a patent foramen ovale. However, an increased risk of subsequent stroke has been seen in patent foramen ovale associated with atrial septal aneurysm. Thus, treatment with aspirin or warfarin could be considered in patients with patent foramen ovale associated with atrial septal abnormalities. There are lack of studies to compare the efficacy of aspirin and warfarin, however aspirin's safety profile has been found to be better than warfarin.

Internatioanl guidelines for prevention of recurrent cerebral embolism in patent foramen ovale

American Academy of Neurology Guidelines for prevention of recurrent cerebral embolism in patent foramen ovale (DO NOT EDIT)[1]

Practice Recommendations

1) For patients who have had a cryptogenic stroke and have a patent foramen ovale (PFO), the evidence indicates that the risk of subsequent stroke or death is no different from other cryptogenic stroke patients without PFO when treated medically with antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants. Therefore, in persons with a cryptogenic stroke receiving such therapy, neurologists should communicate to patients and their families that presence of PFO does not confer an increased risk for subsequent stroke compared to other cryptogenic stroke patients without atrial abnormalities (Level A). However, it is possible that the combination of PFO and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) confers an increased risk of subsequent stroke in medically treated patients who are less than 55 years of age. Therefore, in younger stroke patients, studies that can identify PFO or atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) may be considered for prognostic purposes (Level C).

2) Among patients with a cryptogenic stroke and atrial septal abnormalities, there is insufficient evidence to determine the superiority of aspirin or warfarin for prevention of recurrent stroke or death (Level U), but the risks of minor bleeding are possibly greater with warfarin (Level C)

Rating of Recommendations

A = Established as effective, ineffective, or harmful for the given condition in the specified population.

B = Probably effective, ineffective, or harmful for the given condition in the specified population.

C = Possibly effective, ineffective, or harmful for the given condition in the specified population.

U = Data inadequate or conflicting. Given current knowledge, treatment (test, predictor) is unproven.

American Academy of Chest Physicians Guidelines for prevention of recurrent cerebral embolism in patent foramen ovale (DO NOT EDIT) [2]

Findings

No clear advantage of warfarin over antiplatelets

Recommendations

Antiplatelet treatment recommended.

American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines for prevention of recurrent cerebral embolism in patent foramen ovale (DO NOT EDIT)[3]

1 Antiplatelet therapy reasonable

2 Warfarin reasonable for high-risk patients with other indications such as hypercoagulable state or venous thrombosis

European Stroke Organisation guidelines for prevention of recurrent cerebral embolism in patent foramen ovale (DO NOT EDIT)[4]

1 Patients with cardioembolic stroke unrelated to atrial fibrillation should receive warfarin if the risk of recurrence is high.

References

  1. Messé SR, Silverman IE, Kizer JR, Homma S, Zahn C, Gronseth G; et al. (2004). "Practice parameter: recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology". Neurology. 62 (7): 1042–50. PMID 15078999.
  2. Albers GW, Amarenco P, Easton JD, Sacco RL, Teal P (2004). "Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy". Chest. 126 (3 Suppl): 483S–512S. doi:10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.483S. PMID 15383482.
  3. Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, Albers GW, Bush RL, Fagan SC; et al. (2011). "Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association". Stroke. 42 (1): 227–76. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3181f7d043. PMID 20966421.
  4. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee. ESO Writing Committee (2008). "Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008". Cerebrovasc Dis. 25 (5): 457–507. doi:10.1159/000131083. PMID 18477843.