Myocarditis pathophysiology

Revision as of 21:21, 14 January 2020 by Homa Najafi (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Myocarditis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Adrenergic Myocarditis
Giant Cell Myocarditis

Causes

Differentiating Myocarditis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Myocarditis pathophysiology On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Google Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Myocarditis pathophysiology

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Myocarditis pathophysiology

CDC on Myocarditis pathophysiology

Myocarditis pathophysiology in the news

Blogs on Myocarditis pathophysiology

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Myocarditis pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Varun Kumar, M.B.B.S., Maliha Shakil, M.D. [2] Homa Najafi, M.D.[3]

Overview

During either an infection or a hypersensitivity reaction, the inflammatory response may cause myonecrosis either directly or indirectly as part of an autoimmune reaction. Histopathological features include abundant edema in the myocardial interstitium and an inflammatory infiltrate which is rich in lymphocytes and macrophages. Focal destruction of myocytes as a result of the inflammatory process results in left ventricular dysfunction.

Pathogenesis

Myocarditis is a continuum of three phases of the disease processes with each one evolving into the next.[1]

Phase I: Viral Infection and Replication

Viruses such as coxsackie and enterovirus, get internalized in peripheral tissues and activate the immune system. A few of these viral genomes attach to the immunologic cells which circulate throughout the body and lodge in other organs such as the heart where they further replicate and cause localized tissue destruction.

Phase II: Autoimmune Injury

After the host immune system eliminates the viral genomes from the body, the immune system may remains activated in patients who develop myocarditis. This leads to the development of an autoimmune reaction where T-cells and cytokines target the host tissue such as the myocardium which causes further myocyte damage.

Phase III: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Eosinophilic and hypersensitive myocarditis may occur secondary to parasitic infections, drug hypersensitivity or hypereosinophilic syndrome. Eosinophilic infiltration in myocardium lead to release of eosinophilic proteins which increase cellular membrane permeability which in turn leads to cell death.[5][6] The pathogenesis of this hypersensitivity reaction include either an immediate reaction which involves the degranulation of mast cells and basophils mediated by IgE, or a delayed reaction involving the activation of helper T-cells and interleukin-5.

Microscopic Pathology

Histopathological features include abundant edema in the myocardial interstitium and an inflammatory infiltrate which is rich in lymphocytes and macrophages. Focal destruction of myocytes as a result of the inflammatory process results in left ventricular dysfunction.[7]


5.1. The role of immune response to virus and genetic predisposition Direct viral cytopathic effects followed by an immune response is the current theory of myocyte damage. The immune response to virus is what is considered to cause increased tissue damage, or as in the majority of the cases of asymptomatic disease or spontaneous remission [97], to be what facilitates recovery. It is also postulated that autoimmune disease is triggered by certain viruses or that there is a hypersensitivity response due to cytokineregulated activity [13]. Many different cell types play a role in the development of myocarditis [98]. T lymphocytes are significant in the development ofmyocarditis. Using CD4 and CD8 knockout mice to test the role of specific lymphocyte function on virus-induced myocarditis was shown to affect prognosis due to the absence and/or presence of these cell types [64]. Natural killer cells and their role in cardiac inflammation has only recently been described. A recent review article highlighting their role in inflammatory myocarditis illustrates their potential to serve as protectors of inflammation and as inhibitors to fibrosis formation [99]. Interestingly, one study found that in murine models, natural killer cells may have a protective effect in the progression of autoimmune myocarditis by inhibiting eosinophilic infiltration Eosinophils have been found to drive the progression of autoimmune myocarditis to DCM by producing IL-4 [101]. The expression of TNF a, a proinflammatory cytokine, may be partly responsible for injury to the myocardium. Among TNF apositive cases, the greater TNF a mRNAs, the more impaired the cardiac function in a studied population of virus-positive myocarditis patients [102]. Detection of heart reactive antibodies demonstrate a possible immune-mediated pathway of tissue destruction, as increased levels of IgG are found circulating in patients with myocarditis as compared to controls [103]. A detailed summary of serum cardiac autoantibodies can be found in the 2013 review article ‘Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases’ [55]. Autoimmune myocarditis can be induced in murine models using myocarditogenic peptide [100,104]. Cardiac myosin and Troponin-I have been indicated as the antigen targets of autoantibodies, and these arewell known to circulate in the blood following cardiac injury [105]. The antibodies may contribute to further tissue dysfunction as they are deposited in immune complexes in the myocardium [106]. The present understanding of the four main mechanisms of autoimmune myocarditis was recently summarized by Root-Bernstein and Fairweather [107]. Why the myocardium is targeted is not clear, although there are multiple theories that offer some clues. One of which is that molecular antigenic mimicry may be one of the mechanisms [108]. Additionally, genetic susceptibility may play a role in the development of disease rather than or in addition to the pathogenicity of the virus [11]. Families show evidence of inheritance patterns, and the detection of anti-heart autoantibodies in the serum of healthy relatives of patients with myocarditis and/orDCM is correlative with increased risk of developing disease. Regardless of viral presence, HLA DQ8 was found to be associated with the development of auto immune myocarditis in a murine model. In this population it was found that CD8 was the initiator of disease progression and CD4 (via recruitment of macrophage) is specific to the cardiac pathway [109]. This further indicates that HLA status may have a role in the development of an autoimmune response to antigens.

The Heart in Toxoplasma gondii Myocarditis

{{#ev:youtube|2s9OuW9XlUw}}

The Heart in Coxsackie B2 Myocarditis

{{#ev:youtube|R_7AXF61QGg}}


Overview

The exact pathogenesis of [disease name] is not fully understood.

OR

It is thought that [disease name] is the result of / is mediated by / is produced by / is caused by either [hypothesis 1], [hypothesis 2], or [hypothesis 3].

OR

[Pathogen name] is usually transmitted via the [transmission route] route to the human host.

OR

Following transmission/ingestion, the [pathogen] uses the [entry site] to invade the [cell name] cell.

OR


[Disease or malignancy name] arises from [cell name]s, which are [cell type] cells that are normally involved in [function of cells].

OR

The progression to [disease name] usually involves the [molecular pathway].

OR

The pathophysiology of [disease/malignancy] depends on the histological subtype.

Pathophysiology

Physiology

The normal physiology of [name of process] can be understood as follows:

Pathogenesis

  • The exact pathogenesis of [disease name] is not completely understood.

OR

  • It is understood that [disease name] is the result of / is mediated by / is produced by / is caused by either [hypothesis 1], [hypothesis 2], or [hypothesis 3].
  • [Pathogen name] is usually transmitted via the [transmission route] route to the human host.
  • Following transmission/ingestion, the [pathogen] uses the [entry site] to invade the [cell name] cell.
  • [Disease or malignancy name] arises from [cell name]s, which are [cell type] cells that are normally involved in [function of cells].
  • The progression to [disease name] usually involves the [molecular pathway].
  • The pathophysiology of [disease/malignancy] depends on the histological subtype.

Genetics

[Disease name] is transmitted in [mode of genetic transmission] pattern.

OR

Genes involved in the pathogenesis of [disease name] include:

  • [Gene1]
  • [Gene2]
  • [Gene3]

OR

The development of [disease name] is the result of multiple genetic mutations such as:

  • [Mutation 1]
  • [Mutation 2]
  • [Mutation 3]

Associated Conditions

Conditions associated with [disease name] include:

  • [Condition 1]
  • [Condition 2]
  • [Condition 3]

Gross Pathology

On gross pathology, [feature1], [feature2], and [feature3] are characteristic findings of [disease name].

Microscopic Pathology

On microscopic histopathological analysis, [feature1], [feature2], and [feature3] are characteristic findings of [disease name].


References

  1. Liu PP, Mason JW (2001). "Advances in the understanding of myocarditis". Circulation. 104 (9): 1076–82. PMID 11524405.
  2. Ono K, Matsumori A, Shioi T, Furukawa Y, Sasayama S (1998). "Cytokine gene expression after myocardial infarction in rat hearts: possible implication in left ventricular remodeling". Circulation. 98 (2): 149–56. PMID 9679721.
  3. Lee JK, Zaidi SH, Liu P, Dawood F, Cheah AY, Wen WH; et al. (1998). "A serine elastase inhibitor reduces inflammation and fibrosis and preserves cardiac function after experimentally-induced murine myocarditis". Nat Med. 4 (12): 1383–91. doi:10.1038/3973. PMID 9846575.
  4. Badorff C, Lee GH, Lamphear BJ, Martone ME, Campbell KP, Rhoads RE; et al. (1999). "Enteroviral protease 2A cleaves dystrophin: evidence of cytoskeletal disruption in an acquired cardiomyopathy". Nat Med. 5 (3): 320–6. doi:10.1038/6543. PMID 10086389.
  5. Ginsberg F, Parrillo JE (2005). "Eosinophilic myocarditis". Heart Fail Clin. 1 (3): 419–29. doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2005.06.013. PMID 17386864.
  6. Amini R, Nielsen C (2010). "Eosinophilic myocarditis mimicking acute coronary syndrome secondary to idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome: a case report". J Med Case Reports. 4: 40. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-4-40. PMC 2830978. PMID 20181108.
  7. Feldman AM, McNamara D (2000). "Myocarditis". N Engl J Med. 343 (19): 1388–98. doi:10.1056/NEJM200011093431908. PMID 11070105.

Template:WS Template:WH