Dermatophytosis historical perspective: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Dermatophytosis}}
{{Dermatophytosis}}
Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here.  It's easy!  Click  [[Help:How_to_Edit_a_Page|here]]  to learn about editing.
{{CMG}}; {{AE}}{{HK}}  
 
{{CMG}}  


==Overview==
==Overview==
Dermatophytosis has been prevalent since before 1906, at which time ringworm was treated with compounds of [[mercury]] or sometimes [[sulfur]] or [[iodine]]. Hairy areas of skin were considered too difficult to treat, so the scalp was treated with x-rays and followed up with [[antiparasitic]] medication.
Dermatophytosis was first described by David Gruby, a Hungarian [[physician]], in 1841. Before Gruby, various scientists described [[Lesion|lesions]] which were ring-like, and were thought to be infective. The description of [[lesions]] dates back to the Roman era. Around 1890, Raimond Sabouraud advanced knowledge of dermatomycology by studying extensively into the [[taxonomy]], [[morphology]], and treatment of [[dermatophytes]], even classifying these fungal agents into four [[Genus|genera]] (three of which are still current to mycologists). Dermatophytosis has been prevalent since early 1900's, at which time ringworm was treated with compounds of [[mercury]] or sometimes [[sulfur]] or [[iodine]]. Hairy areas of skin were considered too difficult to treat, so the [[scalp]] was treated with [[x-rays]] and followed up with [[antiparasitic]] medication.
 
== Historical Perspective ==
* In 30 A.D. Aulus Cornelius Celsus, the Roman encyclopedist, who in his book called 'De Re Medicina' described a [[suppurative]] [[infection]] of the [[scalp]] that later was called kerion of Celsus.<ref name="pmid46103792">{{cite journal| author=Ajello L| title=Natural history of the dermatophytes and related fungi. | journal=Mycopathol Mycol Appl | year= 1974 | volume= 53 | issue= 1 | pages= 93-110 | pmid=4610379 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=4610379  }}</ref>
* The term [[tinea]] was first used for a moth of the clothes because the holes made by moths in woolen garments are circular and [[Dermatophytes|dermatophyte]] lesions are ring-like on smooth [[skin]].
* In the 16th century, the term 'ringworm' for these infections was used. This term described the form of the lesion and relates it to the Roman [[tinea]].
* In the 19th century, the [[fungal]] [[etiology]] of ringworm was deciphered and described by various scientists like Robert Remak, Johann L. Schönlein, and David Gruby.
* In 1835, Remak observed [[microscopic]] structures from crusts of favic lesions (favus is [[ringworm]] of the scalp).
* Schönlein identified the specimen having [[fungal]] origin.
* Remak ultimately described the [[fungi]] as ''Achorion schöenleinii.''
* In 1841, David Gruby confirmed the work of Remark and described various types of fungal infections, for example, [[tinea]] favosa, ectothrix and endothrix trichophytosis and microsporiosis.<ref name="pmid4610379">{{cite journal| author=Ajello L| title=Natural history of the dermatophytes and related fungi. | journal=Mycopathol Mycol Appl | year= 1974 | volume= 53 | issue= 1 | pages= 93-110 | pmid=4610379 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=4610379  }}</ref>
* Independently of Remak and Schönlein, Gruby published papers from 1841 to 1844 about the about the cause and nature of Favus, significantly expanding the understanding of dermatophytosis.
* Around 1890, Raimond Sabouraud advanced knowledge of dermatomycology by studying extensively into the [[taxonomy]], [[morphology]], and treatment of [[dermatophytes]], even classifying these [[fungal]] agents into four [[Genus|genera]] (three of which are still current to mycologists).<ref name="pmid46103793">{{cite journal| author=Ajello L| title=Natural history of the dermatophytes and related fungi. | journal=Mycopathol Mycol Appl | year= 1974 | volume= 53 | issue= 1 | pages= 93-110 | pmid=4610379 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=4610379  }}</ref>
* Sabouraud developed a [[Culture medium|medium for culturing]] [[dermatophytes]] that, after a few modifications, is even still used today and is named, Sabouraud glucose agar.
* In the year 1886 cultures of the [[dermatophytes]] were independently achieved for the first time.
* By the year 1935 more than 118 species of [[dermatophytes]] had been described and classified into nine [[Genus|genera]].
== Landmark Events in the Development of Treatment Strategies ==
* In 1906, [[dermatophytes]] was treated with compounds of [[mercury]] or sometimes [[sulfur]] or [[iodine]]. Hairy areas of skin were considered too difficult to treat, so the [[scalp]] was treated with [[x-rays]] and followed up with [[antiparasitic]] medication.
* A variety of [[fungicides]] including [[griseofulvin]], [[tolnaftate]], [[haloprogin]], and [[allylamines]] have been used to fight [[dermatophytes]] in the last 100 years.
* Although some [[species]] have almost eradicated from humankind, for example, T. schoenleinii, M. audouinii, and M. ferrugineum, other species have begun to show resistance to drug therapy in the last 30 years.
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}
[[Category:Disease]]
[[Category:Disease]]
[[Category:Dermatology]]
[[Category:Dermatology]]
[[Category:Infectious disease]]
[[Category:Primary care]]
[[Category:Needs content]]
[[Category:Needs content]]
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}

Latest revision as of 21:18, 29 July 2020

Dermatophytosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Dermatophytosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiographic Findings

X-Ray Findings

CT scan Findings

MRI Findings

Ultrasound Findings

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Dermatophytosis historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Dermatophytosis historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA onDermatophytosis historical perspective

CDC on Dermatophytosis historical perspective

Dermatophytosis historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Dermatophytosis historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Dermatophytosis here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Dermatophytosis historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Syed Hassan A. Kazmi BSc, MD [2]

Overview

Dermatophytosis was first described by David Gruby, a Hungarian physician, in 1841. Before Gruby, various scientists described lesions which were ring-like, and were thought to be infective. The description of lesions dates back to the Roman era. Around 1890, Raimond Sabouraud advanced knowledge of dermatomycology by studying extensively into the taxonomy, morphology, and treatment of dermatophytes, even classifying these fungal agents into four genera (three of which are still current to mycologists). Dermatophytosis has been prevalent since early 1900's, at which time ringworm was treated with compounds of mercury or sometimes sulfur or iodine. Hairy areas of skin were considered too difficult to treat, so the scalp was treated with x-rays and followed up with antiparasitic medication.

Historical Perspective

  • In 30 A.D. Aulus Cornelius Celsus, the Roman encyclopedist, who in his book called 'De Re Medicina' described a suppurative infection of the scalp that later was called kerion of Celsus.[1]
  • The term tinea was first used for a moth of the clothes because the holes made by moths in woolen garments are circular and dermatophyte lesions are ring-like on smooth skin.
  • In the 16th century, the term 'ringworm' for these infections was used. This term described the form of the lesion and relates it to the Roman tinea.
  • In the 19th century, the fungal etiology of ringworm was deciphered and described by various scientists like Robert Remak, Johann L. Schönlein, and David Gruby.
  • In 1835, Remak observed microscopic structures from crusts of favic lesions (favus is ringworm of the scalp).
  • Schönlein identified the specimen having fungal origin.
  • Remak ultimately described the fungi as Achorion schöenleinii.
  • In 1841, David Gruby confirmed the work of Remark and described various types of fungal infections, for example, tinea favosa, ectothrix and endothrix trichophytosis and microsporiosis.[2]
  • Independently of Remak and Schönlein, Gruby published papers from 1841 to 1844 about the about the cause and nature of Favus, significantly expanding the understanding of dermatophytosis.
  • Around 1890, Raimond Sabouraud advanced knowledge of dermatomycology by studying extensively into the taxonomy, morphology, and treatment of dermatophytes, even classifying these fungal agents into four genera (three of which are still current to mycologists).[3]
  • Sabouraud developed a medium for culturing dermatophytes that, after a few modifications, is even still used today and is named, Sabouraud glucose agar.
  • In the year 1886 cultures of the dermatophytes were independently achieved for the first time.
  • By the year 1935 more than 118 species of dermatophytes had been described and classified into nine genera.

Landmark Events in the Development of Treatment Strategies

References

  1. Ajello L (1974). "Natural history of the dermatophytes and related fungi". Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 53 (1): 93–110. PMID 4610379.
  2. Ajello L (1974). "Natural history of the dermatophytes and related fungi". Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 53 (1): 93–110. PMID 4610379.
  3. Ajello L (1974). "Natural history of the dermatophytes and related fungi". Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 53 (1): 93–110. PMID 4610379.

Template:WikiDoc Sources