Chronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Chronic stable angina Microchapters

Acute Coronary Syndrome Main Page

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Classic
Chronic Stable Angina
Atypical
Walk through Angina
Mixed Angina
Nocturnal Angina
Postprandial Angina
Cardiac Syndrome X
Vasospastic Angina

Differentiating Chronic Stable Angina from Acute Coronary Syndromes

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Stratification

Pretest Probability of CAD in a Patient with Angina

Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Test Selection Guideline for the Individual Basis

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Exercise ECG

Chest X Ray

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Pharmacologic Stress

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Thallium

Echocardiography

Exercise Echocardiography

Computed coronary tomography angiography(CCTA)

Positron Emission Tomography

Ambulatory ST Segment Monitoring

Electron Beam Tomography

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Coronary Angiography

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Revascularization

PCI
CABG
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Alternative Therapies for Refractory Angina

Transmyocardial Revascularization (TMR)
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
Enhanced External Counter Pulsation (EECP)
ACC/AHA Guidelines for Alternative Therapies in patients with Refractory Angina

Discharge Care

Patient Follow-Up
Rehabilitation

Secondary Prevention

Guidelines for Asymptomatic Patients

Noninvasive Testing in Asymptomatic Patients
Risk Stratification by Coronary Angiography
Pharmacotherapy to Prevent MI and Death in Asymptomatic Patients

Landmark Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

Chronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Chronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease

CDC onChronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease

Chronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease in the news

Blogs on Chronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease

to Hospitals Treating Chronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease

Risk calculators and risk factors for Chronic stable angina risk assessment in patients with an intermediate or high probability of coronary artery disease

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [5]; Associate Editors-in-Chief: Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan, M.B.B.S.

Overview

Based on the ACC/AHA guidelines [1], the pretest probability of underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) can be classified into low (less than 10%-20%) , intermediate (between 20%-80%) and high probability (more than 80%-90%). All patients with intermediate to high probability of CAD need to undergo exercise stress testing [2] [3] to stratify the risk of subsequent coronary events and hence determine the appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Bruce protocol and DUKE score are widely adopted methods for exercise stress testing. The exercise capacity, clinical, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic responses must be considered while interpreting the results of exercise treadmill test.

Exercise Treadmill Test Interpretation

  • Angina: if occurred during or after exercise, particularly if it forces to stop the test.
  • ST segment changes if occurred during or after exercise. Factors that indicate high probability of underlying CAD include:
  • Hemodynamic responses like changes in heart rate or blood pressure with exercise,
  • Workload in metabolic equivalents (METs).
  • In a 40-year old man weighing 70kg, 1 MET refers to the resting volume oxygen consumption per minute (VO2).
  • 1 MET = 3.5 mL/min/kg of body weight.

Methods to assess Exercise Treadmill Test

  • Bruce protocol:
  • Bruce protocol is most widely used and has seven stages, with a complete 21-minute exercise and each stage lasting for 2-minutes.
  • The result is satisfactory when a patient completes of 9-12minutes of exercise or 85% of the maximum predicted changes in heart rate
Stage 1 0-3 min 1.7 mph 10% grade 5.0 METS
Stage 2 3-6 min 2.5 mph 12% grade 6.8 METS
Stage 3 6-9 min 3.4 mph 14% grade 9.4 METS
Stage 4 9-12 min 4.2 mph 16% grade 13.3 METS
Stage 5 12-15 min 5.0 mph 18% grade 16.6 METS
Stage 6 15-18 min 5.5 mph 20% grade 19.5 METS
Stage 7 18-21 min 6.0 mph 22% grade 22.7 METS
  • DUKE treadmill score = [(exercise duration in minutes) - (5 x ST segment deviation, during or after exercise, in millimeters) - (4 if angina occurs or 8 if angina is the reason to stop the test)] [4]
CAD risk probability (DTS) 4-year survival Annual mortality
Low probability (more than 5 DTS) 99% 0.25%
Moderate probability (-10 to 4 DTS) 95% 1.25%
High probability (less than -10 DTS) 79% 5%

ACC / AHA Guidelines- Risk Assessment and Prognosis in Patients With an Intermediate or High Probability of CAD (DO NOT EDIT) [1]

Class I

1. Patients undergoing initial evaluation. (Exceptions are listed below in classes IIb and III.) (Level of Evidence: B)

2. Patients after a significant change in cardiac symptoms. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1. Patients with the following ECG abnormalities:

a. Preexcitation (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) . (Level of Evidence: B)
b. Electronically paced ventricular rhythm. (Level of Evidence: B)
c. More than 1 mm of rest ST depression. (Level of Evidence: B)
d. Complete left bundle-branch block. (Level of Evidence: B)

2. Patients who have undergone cardiac catheterization to identify ischemia in the distribution of a coronary lesion of borderline severity. (Level of Evidence: C)

3.Postrevascularization patients who have a significant change in anginal pattern suggesting ischemia. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III

1. Patients with severe comorbidity likely to limit life expectancy or prevent revascularization. (Level of Evidence: C)

Vote on and Suggest Revisions to the Current Guidelines

Sources

  • Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology [5]
  • The ACC/AHA/ACP–ASIM Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina [1]
  • TheACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina [6]
  • The 2007 Chronic Angina Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina [7]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Douglas JS, Fihn SD, Gardin JM et al. (1999) ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: executive summary and recommendations. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). Circulation 99 (21):2829-48. [1] PMID: 10351980
  2. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, Hlatky MA, Lee KL, Bengtson JR et al. (1991) Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 325 (12):849-53. DOI:10.1056/NEJM199109193251204 PMID: 1875969
  3. Mark DB, Hlatky MA, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB (1987) Exercise treadmill score for predicting prognosis in coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 106 (6):793-800. PMID: 3579066
  4. Johnson GG, Decker WW, Lobl JK, Laudon DA, Hess JJ, Lohse CM et al. (2008) Risk stratification of patients in an emergency department chest pain unit: prognostic value of exercise treadmill testing using the Duke score. Int J Emerg Med 1 (2):91-5. DOI:10.1007/s12245-008-0031-5 PMID: 19384658
  5. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F; et al. (2006). [url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=16735367 [2] "Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology"] Check |url= value (help). Eur Heart J. 27 (11): 1341–81. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl001. PMID 16735367.
  6. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS et al. (2003) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). Circulation 107 (1):149-58.[3] PMID: 12515758
  7. Fraker TD, Fihn SD, Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J et al. (2007)2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. Circulation 116 (23):2762-72.[4] PMID: 17998462


Template:WikiDoc Sources