Unstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy

Revision as of 18:10, 1 October 2012 by Esther Lee (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acute Coronary Syndrome Main Page

Unstable angina / NSTEMI Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Classification

Pathophysiology

Unstable Angina
Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Differentiating Unstable Angina/Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction from other Disorders

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Stratification

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Special Groups

Women
Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock
Perioperative NSTE-ACS Related to Noncardiac Surgery
Stress (Takotsubo) Cardiomyopathy
Diabetes Mellitus
Post CABG Patients
Older Adults
Chronic Kidney Disease
Angiographically Normal Coronary Arteries
Variant (Prinzmetal's) Angina
Substance Abuse
Cardiovascular "Syndrome X"

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Blood Studies
Biomarkers

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Echocardiography

Coronary Angiography

Treatment

Primary Prevention

Immediate Management

Anti-Ischemic and Analgesic Therapy

Cholesterol Management

Antitplatelet Therapy

Antiplatelet therapy recommendations
Aspirin
Thienopyridines
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor

Anticoagulant Therapy

Additional Management Considerations for Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy

Risk Stratification Before Discharge for Patients With an Ischemia-Guided Strategy of NSTE-ACS

Mechanical Reperfusion

Initial Conservative Versus Initial Invasive Strategies
PCI
CABG

Complications of Bleeding and Transfusion

Discharge Care

Medical Regimen
Post-Discharge Follow-Up
Cardiac Rehabilitation

Long-Term Medical Therapy and Secondary Prevention

ICD implantation within 40 days of myocardial infarction

ICD within 90 days of revascularization

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Unstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Unstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy

CDC onUnstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy

Unstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in the news

Blogs on Unstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy

to Hospitals Treating Unstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy

Risk calculators and risk factors for Unstable angina non ST elevation myocardial infarction additional management considerations for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview of Additional Management Considerations for Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy in UA / NSTEMI

ACC / AHA Guidelines (DO NOT EDIT) [1]

Class I

1. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom an initial conservative strategy is selected and no subsequent features appear that would necessitate diagnostic angiography (recurrent symptoms / ischemia, heart failure or serious arrhythmias), a stress test should be performed. (Level of Evidence: B).

a. If, after stress testing, the patient is classified as not at low risk, diagnostic angiography should be performed. (Level of Evidence: A)
b. If, after stress testing, the patient is classified as being at low risk, the following instructions should be used in preparation for discharge (Level of Evidence: A):
  • Continue ASA indefinitely. (Level of Evidence: A)
  • Continue clopidogrel for at least 1 month (Level of Evidence: A) and ideally up to 1 year. (Level of Evidence: B)
  • Discontinue intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor if started previously. (Level of Evidence: A)
  • Continue UFH for 48 hours (Level of Evidence: A) or administer enoxaparin (Level of Evidence: A) or fondaparinux (Level of Evidence: B) for the duration of hospitalization, up to 8 days, and then discontinue anticoagulant therapy. (Level of Evidence: A)


2. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom CABG is selected as a postangiography management strategy, the instructions noted below should be followed.

a. Continue ASA. (Level of Evidence: A)
b. Discontinue clopidogrel 5 to 7 d before elective CABG. (Level of Evidence: B) More urgent surgery, if necessary, may be performed by experienced surgeons if the incremental bleeding risk is considered acceptable. (Level of Evidence: C)
c. Discontinue intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (eptifibatide or tirofiban) 4 h before CABG. (Level of Evidence: B)
d. Anticoagulant therapy should be managed as follows:
  • Continue UFH. (Class I Level of Evidence: B)
  • Discontinue enoxaparin 12 to 24 h before CABG and dose with UFH per institutional practice. (Level of Evidence: B)
  • Discontinue fondaparinux 24 h before CABG and dose with UFH per institutional practice. (Level of Evidence: B)
  • Discontinue bivalirudin 3 h before CABG and dose with UFH per institutional practice. (Level of Evidence: B)


3. In patients taking a thienopyridine in whom CABG is planned and can be delayed, it is recommended that the drug be discontinued to allow for dissipation of the antiplatelet effect (Level of Evidence: B). The period of withdrawal should be at least 5 days in patients receiving clopidogrel (Level of Evidence: B) and at least 7 days in patients receiving prasugrel (Level of Evidence: C) unless the need for revascularization and/or the net benefit of the thienopyridine outweighs the potential risks of excess bleeding. (Level of Evidence: C)


4. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom PCI has been selected as a postangiography management strategy, the instructions noted below should be followed:

a. Continue ASA. (Level of Evidence: A)
b. Administer a loading dose of a thienopyridine if not started before diagnostic angiography. (Level of Evidence: A)
c. See Class IIa, #1, in this section.
d. Discontinue anticoagulant therapy after PCI for uncomplicated cases. (Level of Evidence: B)


5. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom medical therapy is selected as a management strategy and in whom no significant obstructive CAD on angiography was found, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy should be administered at the discretion of the clinician (Level of Evidence: C). For patients in whom evidence of coronary atherosclerosis is present (e.g., luminal irregularities or intravascular ultrasound demonstrated lesions), albeit without flow-limiting stenoses, long-term treatment with ASA and other secondary prevention measures should be prescribed. (Level of Evidence: C)


6. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom medical therapy is selected as a postangiography management strategy and in whom CAD was found on angiography, the following approach is recommended:

a. Continue ASA. (Class I Level of Evidence: A)
b. Administer a loading dose of clopidogrel if not given before diagnostic angiography. (Level of Evidence: B)
c. Discontinue intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor if started previously. (Level of Evidence: B)
d. Anticoagulant therapy should be managed as follows:


7. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom a conservative strategy is selected and who do not undergo coronary angiography or stress testing, the instructions noted below should be followed:

a. Continue ASA indefinitely. (Class I Level of Evidence: A)
b. Continue clopidogrel for at least 1 month and ideally up to 1 year. (Level of Evidence: B)
c. Discontinue IV GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor if started previously. (Level of Evidence: A)
d. Continue UFH for 48 h or administer enoxaparin or fondaparinux for the duration of hospitalization, up to 8 d, and then discontinue anticoagulant therapy. (Level of Evidence: A)


8. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom an initial conservative strategy is selected and in whom no subsequent features appear that would necessitate diagnostic angiography (recurrent symptoms / ischemia, HF, or serious arrhythmias), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction should be measured. (Level of Evidence: B)

Class III

1. Intravenous fibrinolytic therapy is not indicated in patients without acute ST segment elevation, a true posterior MI, or a presumed new left bundle branch block (LBBB). (Level of Evidence: A)

Class IIa

1. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom PCI has been selected as a postangiography management strategy, it is reasonable to administer an IV GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban) if not started before diagnostic angiography, particularly for troponin-positive and/or other high-risk patients. (Level of Evidence: A)

2. For UA / NSTEMI patients in whom PCI is selected as a post angiography management strategy, it is reasonable to omit administration of an intravenous GP IIb/IIIa antagonist if bivalirudin was selected as the anticoagulant and at least 300 mg of clopidogrel was administered at least 6 h earlier. (Level of Evidence: B)

3. If Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction is ≤40%, it is reasonable to perform diagnostic angiography. (Level of Evidence: B)

4. If Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction is >40%, it is reasonable to perform a stress test. (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIb

1. Platelet function testing to determine platelet inhibitory response in patients with UA / NSTEMI (or, after ACS and PCI) on thienopyridine therapy may be considered if results of testing may alter management. (Level of Evidence: B)

2. Genotyping for a CYP2C19 loss of function variant in patients with UA / NSTEMI (or, after ACS and with PCI) on clopidogrel therapy might be considered if results of testing may alter management. (Level of Evidence: C)

See Also

Sources

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction [1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE, Ettinger SM, Fesmire FM, Ganiats TG, Jneid H, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Philippides GJ, Theroux P, Wenger NK, Zidar JP (2011). "2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Circulation. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820f2f3e. PMID 21444889. Retrieved 2011-03-31. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WH Template:WS