Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neurosyphilis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Neurosyphilis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice

CDC on Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice

Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice in the news

Blogs on Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice

Directions to Hospitals Treating Neurosyphilis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Neurosyphilis diagnostic study of choice

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamadmostafa Jahansouz M.D.[2]

Overview

The first step laboratory test when there is a clinical suspicious toward neurosyphilis is a venereal disease research laboratory test (VDRL) or rapid plasma reagin (RPR). Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) test is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis.

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Study of choice:

The comparison table for diagnostic studies of choice for neurosyphilis

Sensitivity Specificity
FTA-ABS
  • 84% for detecting primary syphilis infection
  • 100% sensitivity for detecting syphilis infection in secondary and tertiary stages[2]
96%[2]
VDRL/RPR
  • 78% to 86% for detecting primary syphilis infection
  • 100% for detecting secondary syphilis infection, and 95% to 98% for detecting latent syphilis infection[2]
85% to 99%[2]

References

  1. Lin LR, Fu ZG, Dan B, Jing GJ, Tong ML, Chen DT; et al. (2010). "Development of a colloidal gold-immunochromatography assay to detect immunoglobulin G antibodies to Treponema pallidum with TPN17 and TPN47". Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 68 (3): 193–200. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.06.019. PMID 20846810.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Calonge N, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2004). "Screening for syphilis infection: recommendation statement". Ann Fam Med. 2 (4): 362–5. PMC 1466700. PMID 15335137.

Template:WH Template:WS