Incidentaloma CT scan

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Incidentaloma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Incidentaloma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Incidentaloma CT scan On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Incidentaloma CT scan

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Incidentaloma CT scan

CDC on Incidentaloma CT scan

Incidentaloma CT scan in the news

Blogs on Incidentaloma CT scan

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Incidentaloma CT scan

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Abdelwahed M.D[2]

Overview

Abdominal CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of [disease name]. Differentiation between benign and malignant incidentaloma is important. Malignancy is suggested on CT by a large diameter more than 6 cms, irregular border, inhomogeneity, a “washout” of contrast after 15 min of less than 40%, and calcifications. Contrast-enhanced washout CT utilizes the unique perfusion pattern of adenomas. Adenomas take up intravenous CT contrast rapidly, but also have a rapid loss of contrast – a phenomenon termed ‘contrast enhancement washout’. It is assumed that malignant adrenal lesions usually enhance rapidly but demonstrate a slower washout of contrast medium.

CT scan

    • Large diameter more than 6 cm,
    • Irregular border,
    • Non-homogenous,
    • Washout of contrast after 15 min of less than 40%,
    • Calcifications.[1]
  • Many malignant lesions may look benign.
  • A large diameter is not diagnostic; only about 25% of masses larger than 4 cm were adrenal cancer.

The Hounsfield unit differentiation

  • CT has a high quantitative contrast resolution, which allows assessment of tissue density by measuring X-ray absorption of tissues.
  • This allows calculation of tissue attenuation or tissue density values, which are measured in Hounsfield units (HU).
  • The Hounsfield unit (HU) is a quantity commonly used in computed tomography (CT) scanning to express CT numbers in a standardized and convenient form.
  • Hounsfield units are obtained from a linear transformation of the measured attenuation coefficients.
  • The intra-cytoplasmic fat in adenomas results in low attenuation on non-enhanced CT in contrast to non-adenomas have higher attenuation in non-enhanced CT.[2]
  • Up to 30 percent of adenomas do not contain large amounts of lipid.
  • A homogeneous adrenal mass with a smooth border and an attenuation value <10 HU on un-enhanced CT is likely to be a benign adenoma.[3]
  • The only patients in the non-adenoma groups with a non-contrast CT HU <10 were those with myelo-lipomas.

Contrast-enhanced washout CT

  • Contrast-enhanced washout CT utilizes the unique perfusion pattern of adenomas. Adenomas take up intravenous CT contrast rapidly, but also have a rapid loss of contrast – a phenomenon termed ‘contrast enhancement washout’.[4]
  • It is assumed that malignant adrenal lesions usually enhance rapidly but demonstrate a slower washout of contrast medium.[5]
  • Fifteen minutes after administration of contrast, an absolute contrast medium washout of more than 40 percent was reported to be 100 percent sensitive and specific for adenoma when patients with adenomas were compared with carcinomas, pheochromocytomas, and metastases.[6]
CT without contrast showing adrenal adenoma with HU less than 10, source: Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 26
CT shows cortical mass fungating from the lower pole of the left kidney, predominantly of fat density, with areas of soft tissue component and prominent vascularity within. most ommonly angiomyolipoma, source: Case courtesy of Dr Abdallah Khateeb , Radiopaedia.org, rID: 44940
MRI shows adrenal carcinoma, source: Case courtesy of Dr Natalie Yang, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 676


References

  1. Boland GW, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Mayo-Smith WW (2008). "Incidental adrenal lesions: principles, techniques, and algorithms for imaging characterization". Radiology. 249 (3): 756–75. doi:10.1148/radiol.2493070976. PMID 19011181.
  2. Nieman LK (2010). "Approach to the patient with an adrenal incidentaloma". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 95 (9): 4106–13. doi:10.1210/jc.2010-0457. PMC 2936073. PMID 20823463.
  3. Grumbach MM, Biller BM, Braunstein GD, Campbell KK, Carney JA, Godley PA; et al. (2003). "Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma")". Ann Intern Med. 138 (5): 424–9. PMID 12614096.
  4. Peña CS, Boland GW, Hahn PF, Lee MJ, Mueller PR (2000). "Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT". Radiology. 217 (3): 798–802. doi:10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc29798. PMID 11110946.
  5. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber FH (1998). "Adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas: assessment of washout at delayed contrast-enhanced CT". Radiology. 207 (2): 369–75. doi:10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577483. PMID 9577483.
  6. Song JH, Mayo-Smith WW (2014). "Current status of imaging for adrenal gland tumors". Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 23 (4): 847–61. doi:10.1016/j.soc.2014.06.002. PMID 25246052.

Template:WH Template:WS