Pericardial effusion overview

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pericardial effusion Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pericardial effusion from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Cardiac Catheterization

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Pericardial Window

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Pericardial effusion overview On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Google Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pericardial effusion overview

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pericardial effusion overview

CDC on Pericardial effusion overview

Pericardial effusion overview in the news

Blogs on Pericardial effusion overview

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pericardial effusion overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mugilan Poongkunran M.B.B.S [2]

Overview

There is limited information about the historical perspective of pericardial effusion. However, percutaneous pericardiocentesis was first described in 1840 by Frank Schuh. By the 20th century, pericardiocentesis became the established technique for diagnosing and treating pericardial effusion. Before echocardiography, surgeons used a blind-subxiphoid approach; however, this was associated with serious organ injuries. However, the introduction of echo-guided pericardiocentesis improved the accuracy and safety of the procedure. The technique has been further refined over the past four decades.Pericardial effusion can be classified according to the nature of pericardial fluid into transudative, exudative, hemorrhagic, and malignant. Further, it can be classified according to the underlying cause into idiopathic, infectious, neoplastic, and post-operative. In addition, Horowitz et al. developed a classification for pericardial effusions based on echocardiographic findings (the degree of separation between the pericardium and epicardium). Pericardial effusion can be classified into serous, bloody and chylous effusions based on the composition of the effusion fluid. Infections and inflammation usually cause serous effusion while bloody effusions are as a result of trauma to the heart. Though iatrogenic causes and infections are the common etiologies, pericardial disease may also be a feature of other disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease. Aortic dissection or free wall rupture should also be considered in patients with unstable hemodynamics and pericardial tamponade.Most pericardial effusions are caused by inflammation of the pericardium, a condition called pericarditis. As the pericardium becomes inflamed, extra fluid is produced, leading to a pericardial effusion. Viral infections are one of the main causes of pericarditis and pericardial effusions. Infections causing pericardial effusions include cytomegalovirus, coxsackie virus, echovirus, and HIV. However, other conditions like injury to the pericardium or heart from a medical procedure, myocardial infarction, uremia, autoimmune disease and cancer should be considered in differential diagnosis of pericardial effusion.The underlying cause of pericardial effusion depend on the region where the patient is living. While malignancy is the most common cause of pericardial effusion in developed countries, infections such as tuberculosis and HIV seems to be the main etiologies of pericardial effusion in developing countries.

Historical Perspective

There is limited information about the historical perspective of pericardial effusion. However, percutaneous pericardiocentesis was first described in 1840 by Frank Schuh. By the 20th century, pericardiocentesis became the established technique for diagnosing and treating pericardial effusion. Before echocardiography, surgeons used a blind-subxiphoid approach; however, this was associated with serious organ injuries. However, the introduction of echo-guided pericardiocentesis improved the accuracy and safety of the procedure. The technique has been further refined over the past four decades.

Classification

Pericardial effusion can be classified according to the nature of pericardial fluid into transudative, exudative, hemorrhagic, and malignant. Further, it can be classified according to the underlying cause into idiopathic, infectious, neoplastic, and post-operative. In addition, Horowitz et al. developed a classification for pericardial effusions based on echocardiographic findings (the degree of separation between the pericardium and epicardium).

Pathophysiology

Causes

Pericardial effusion can be classified into serous, bloody and chylous effusions based on the composition of the effusion fluid. Infections and inflammation usually cause serous effusion while bloody effusions are as a result of trauma to the heart. Though iatrogenic causes and infections are the common etiologies, pericardial disease may also be a feature of other disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease. Aortic dissection or free wall rupture should also be considered in patients with unstable hemodynamics and pericardial tamponade.

Differentiating Pericardial Effusion from Other Diseases

Most pericardial effusions are caused by inflammation of the pericardium, a condition called pericarditis. As the pericardium becomes inflamed, extra fluid is produced, leading to a pericardial effusion. Viral infections are one of the main causes of pericarditis and pericardial effusions. Infections causing pericardial effusions include cytomegalovirus, coxsackie virus, echovirus, and HIV. However, other conditions like injury to the pericardium or heart from a medical procedure, myocardial infarction, uremia, autoimmune disease and cancer should be considered in differential diagnosis of pericardial effusion.

Epidemiology and Demographics

The underlying cause of pericardial effusion depend on the region where the patient is living. While malignancy is the most common cause of pericardial effusion in developed countries, infections such as tuberculosis and HIV seems to be the main etiologies of pericardial effusion in developing countries.

Risk Factors

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for pericardial effusion.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

References

Template:WH Template:WS