Cirrhosis laboratory findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Cirrhosis}}
{{Cirrhosis}}
{{CMG}} {{AE}} {{ADI}}
{{PleaseHelp}}


{{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADI}}
==Overview==
==Overview==
A range of laboratory values need to be obtained in the evaluation of cirrhosis, both to determine the severity of the disease, and to determine the causative factor. [[Liver function tests]], [[complete blood count]], [[basic metabolic panel]] and [[coagulation factors]] are standard in the evaluation of cirrhosis. More specific testing for markers and serum enzymes can be done when certain  genetic causes and etiologies are suspected.
A range of laboratory values need to be obtained in the evaluation of cirrhosis, both to determine the severity of the disease, and to determine the causative factor. [[Liver function tests]], [[complete blood count]], [[basic metabolic panel]] and [[coagulation factors]] are standard in the evaluation of cirrhosis. More specific testing for markers and serum enzymes can be done when certain  genetic causes and etiologies are suspected.
Line 64: Line 66:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}


{{reflist|2}}
[[Category:Gastroenterology]]
[[Category:Hepatology]]
[[Category:Disease]]


{{WH}}
{{WH}}
{{WS}}
{{WS}}

Revision as of 15:30, 18 July 2016

Cirrhosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Cirrhosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Tertiary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case studies

Case #1

Cirrhosis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cirrhosis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cirrhosis laboratory findings

CDC on Cirrhosis laboratory findings

Cirrhosis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Cirrhosis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Cirrhosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cirrhosis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2]

Please help WikiDoc by adding content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing.

Overview

A range of laboratory values need to be obtained in the evaluation of cirrhosis, both to determine the severity of the disease, and to determine the causative factor. Liver function tests, complete blood count, basic metabolic panel and coagulation factors are standard in the evaluation of cirrhosis. More specific testing for markers and serum enzymes can be done when certain genetic causes and etiologies are suspected.

Laboratory Findings

The following findings are typical in cirrhosis:

There is now a validated and patented combination of 6 of these markers as non-invasive biomarkers of fibrosis (and so of cirrhosis) : FibroTest.[3]

Other laboratory studies performed in newly diagnosed cirrhosis may include:

Combinations of tests

Clinical prediction rules exist to help diagnosis cirrhosis.[4]

  • Pohl's Index is if the AST/ALT ratio ≥1 and platelet count ≤ 150,000/mm3 then cirrhosis is very likely.[5]
  • The Bonacini score is based on the ALT/AST ratio, platelet count, and INR.[6]
    • A score of > 7 or 8 makes cirrhosis more likely.[7]
    • A score of < 3 makes cirrhosis less likely.[7]

In diagnosis of cirrhosis (Ishak scores, 5-6) in patients with hepatitis C, the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) ratio > 1 suggests cirrhosis with accuracy of:[8]

  • Sensitivity = 79%
  • Specificity = 78%

References

  1. Warrell DA, Cox TN, Firth JD, Benz ED. Oxford textbook of medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-19-262922-0.
  2. Runyon BA, Montano AA, Akriviadis EA, Antillon MR, Irving MA, McHutchison JG. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:215-20. PMID 1616215.
  3. Halfon P, Munteanu M, Poynard T (2008). "FibroTest-ActiTest as a non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis". Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 32 (6): 22–39. doi:10.1016/S0399-8320(08)73991-5. PMID 18973844.
  4. Udell JA, Wang CS, Tinmouth J, FitzGerald JM, Ayas NT, Simel DL; et al. (2012). "Does this patient with liver disease have cirrhosis?". JAMA. 307 (8): 832–42. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.186. PMID 22357834.
  5. Borroni G, Ceriani R, Cazzaniga M, Tommasini M, Roncalli M, Maltempo C; et al. (2006). "Comparison of simple tests for the non-invasive diagnosis of clinically silent cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C." Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 24 (5): 797–804. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03034.x. PMID 16918883.
  6. Colli A, Colucci A, Paggi S, Fraquelli M, Massironi S, Andreoletti M; et al. (2005). "Accuracy of a predictive model for severe hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C.". World J Gastroenterol. 11 (46): 7318–22. PMID 16437635.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Does this patient have cirrhosis? JAMA 2012
  8. Gara N, Zhao X, Kleiner DE, Liang TJ, Hoofnagle JH, Ghany MG (2013). "Discordance among transient elastography, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, and histologic assessments of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C." Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 11 (3): 303–308.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.044. PMID 23142332.

Template:WH Template:WS