Incidentaloma secondary prevention

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Incidentaloma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Incidentaloma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Incidentaloma secondary prevention On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Incidentaloma secondary prevention

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Incidentaloma secondary prevention

CDC on Incidentaloma secondary prevention

Incidentaloma secondary prevention in the news

Blogs on Incidentaloma secondary prevention

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Incidentaloma secondary prevention

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Abdelwahed M.D[2]

Overview

Effective measures for the secondary prevention of adrenal incidentaloma include annual biochemical follow-up for up to 5 yr, no routine follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas with a non-contrast attenuation value no greater than 10 HU. Patients with adrenal masses less than 4 cm in size and a non-contrast attenuation value more than 10 HU should have a repeat CT study in 3–6 months and then yearly for 2 yr.

Secondary Prevention

Effective measures for the secondary prevention of adrenal incidentaloma include:[1][2][3][4][5]

  • Excess hormone secretion may develop in up to 20% of patients with previously non-functional adrenal tumors during follow-up.
  • The transformation rate of non-functional adrenal masses to functional tumors seems to be higher in adrenal masses greater than 3 cm in size.
  • Annual biochemical follow-up for up to 5 years may be reasonable for patients with adrenal incidentalomas, especially if the tumor is more than 3 cm in size.
  • No routine follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas with a non-contrast attenuation value no greater than 10 HU.
  • Malignancy can be detected by an absolute increase in size of 0.8 cm, 0.64 cm growth per year or a 25% increase in size per year.
  • A one-time follow-up scan in 6–12 months may be reassuring to the physician and the patient.
  • Patients with adrenal masses less than 4 cm in size and a non-contrast attenuation value more than 10 HU should have a repeat CT study in 3–6 months and then yearly for 2 yr.
  • Surgical excision may be considered for tumors with indeterminate radiological features that grow at least 0.8 cm over 3- to 12-month follow-up.

References

  1. Barzon L, Scaroni C, Sonino N, Fallo F, Paoletta A, Boscaro M (1999). "Risk factors and long-term follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas". J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84 (2): 520–6. doi:10.1210/jcem.84.2.5444. PMID 10022410.
  2. Grumbach MM, Biller BM, Braunstein GD, Campbell KK, Carney JA, Godley PA; et al. (2003). "Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma")". Ann Intern Med. 138 (5): 424–9. PMID 12614096.
  3. Pantalone KM, Gopan T, Remer EM, Faiman C, Ioachimescu AG, Levin HS; et al. (2010). "Change in adrenal mass size as a predictor of a malignant tumor". Endocr Pract. 16 (4): 577–87. doi:10.4158/EP09351.OR. PMID 20150023.
  4. Zeiger MA, Thompson GB, Duh QY, Hamrahian AH, Angelos P, Elaraj D; et al. (2009). "American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Medical Guidelines for the Management of Adrenal Incidentalomas: executive summary of recommendations". Endocr Pract. 15 (5): 450–3. doi:10.4158/EP.15.5.450. PMID 19632968.
  5. Cawood TJ, Hunt PJ, O'Shea D, Cole D, Soule S (2009). "Recommended evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas is costly, has high false-positive rates and confers a risk of fatal cancer that is similar to the risk of the adrenal lesion becoming malignant; time for a rethink?". Eur J Endocrinol. 161 (4): 513–27. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0234. PMID 19439510.

Template:WH Template:WS