Tricuspid stenosis surgery: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Tricuspid stenosis}}
{{Tricuspid stenosis}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} [[User:Mohammed Salih|Mohammed Salih, M.D.]] {{sali}} {{Rim}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{VKG}} ;[[User:Mohammed Salih|Mohammed Salih, M.D.]]; {{sali}} {{Rim}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
Line 23: Line 23:
* Consider repair of the [[tricuspid valve]] if its feasible.
* Consider repair of the [[tricuspid valve]] if its feasible.
* If tricuspid [[Valve repair versus valve replacement|valve repair]] not an option consider valve replacement.
* If tricuspid [[Valve repair versus valve replacement|valve repair]] not an option consider valve replacement.
*Patients who are undergoing tricuspid valve replacement the mortality rate is little higher when compared to patients who are undergoing tricuspid valve repair.
*Patients who are undergoing [[tricuspid valve]] replacement the [[Mortality rate|mortality]] rate is little higher when compared to patients who are undergoing tricuspid valve repair.
*While considering tricuspid valve replacement it can be done in 2 ways:
*While considering [[tricuspid valve]] replacement it can be done in 2 ways:
**Open tricuspid valve replacement
**Open [[tricuspid valve]] replacement
**Transcatheter replacement
**Transcatheter replacement


* Surgeon can choose either a bioprosthetic valve or an mechanical valve, the outcome is same using either of the valves with some conditions as an exception.
*[[Surgeon]] can choose either a [[Bioprosthetic valves|bioprosthetic]] valve or an [[Mechanical heart valves|mechanical]] valve, the outcome is same using either of the valves with some conditions as an exception.
*Survival in patients with bioprosthetic valve or an mechanical valve is almost same.
*Survival in patients with [[Bioprosthetic valves|bioprosthetic valve]] or an [[mechanical valve]] is almost the same.
* In patients with carcinoid syndrome, using a mechanical valve over a bioprosthetic valve is better choice to avoid the degeneration on the valve.<br />
* In patients with [[carcinoid syndrome]], using a [[mechanical valve]] over a [[bioprosthetic valve]] is better choice to avoid the [[degeneration]] on the valve.<br />


==2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary<ref name="pmid24589852">{{cite journal| author=Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA et al.| title=2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. | journal=Circulation | year= 2014 | volume=  | issue=  | pages=  | pmid=24589852 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24589852  }} </ref>==
==2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary<ref name="pmid24589852">{{cite journal| author=Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA et al.| title=2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. | journal=Circulation | year= 2014 | volume=  | issue=  | pages=  | pmid=24589852 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24589852  }} </ref>==

Revision as of 05:05, 2 April 2020

Tricuspid stenosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Tricuspid stenosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Tricuspid stenosis surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Tricuspid stenosis surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Tricuspid stenosis surgery

CDC on Tricuspid stenosis surgery

Tricuspid stenosis surgery in the news

Blogs on Tricuspid stenosis surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Tricuspid stenosis surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Vamsikrishna Gunnam M.B.B.S [2] ;Mohammed Salih, M.D.; Syed Musadiq Ali M.B.B.S.[3] Rim Halaby, M.D. [4]

Overview

Surgical tricuspid valve replacement in tricuspid stenosis (TS) is recommended among patients undergoing surgical intervention for left valvular disease as well as among patients with severe symptomatic isolated tricuspid stenosis (TS).

Surgery

Valvotomy

Balloon Valvuloplasty for Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve Stenosis
Balloon Valvuloplasty for Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve Stenosis. Case courtesy by Emmanouil Petrou, MD et al[9]

Valve surgery

2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary[1]

Class I
"1. Tricuspid valve surgery is recommended for patients with severe TS at the time of operation for left-sided valve disease. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"2. Tricuspid valve surgery is recommended for patients with isolated, symptomatic severe TS. (Level of Evidence: C)"
Class IIb
"1. Percutaneous balloon tricuspid commissurotomy might be considered in patients with isolated, symptomatic severe TS without accompanying TR. (Level of Evidence: C)"

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA; et al. (2014). "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Circulation. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029. PMID 24589852.
  2. Yunoki, Kei; Naruko, Takahiko; Itoh, Akira; Ohashi, Junko; Fujimoto, Kohei; Shirai, Naoya; Shimamura, Koichi; Komatsu, Ryushi; Sakanoue, Yuji; Haze, Kazuo (2006). "Percutaneous Transcatheter Balloon Valvuloplasty for Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve Stenosis". Circulation. 114 (18). doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618611. ISSN 0009-7322.
  3. Orbe, Luis Calvo; Sobrino, Nicolas; Arcas, Ramón; Peinado, Rafael; Frutos, Araceli; Blazquez, Jose Rico; Maté, Isabel; Sobrino, Jose Antonio (1993). "Initial outcome of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty in rheumatic tricuspid valve stenosis". The American Journal of Cardiology. 71 (4): 353–354. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(93)90808-P. ISSN 0002-9149.
  4. Rana G, Malhotra R, Sharma A, Kakouros N (2017). "Percutaneous Valvuloplasty for Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve Stenosis". Tex Heart Inst J. 44 (1): 43–49. doi:10.14503/THIJ-15-5408. PMC 5317359. PMID 28265212.
  5. Sobrino N, Calvo Orbe L, Merino JL, Peinado R, Mate I, Rico J; et al. (1995). "Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty for concurrent mitral, aortic and tricuspid rheumatic stenosis". Eur Heart J. 16 (5): 711–3. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060979. PMID 7588907.
  6. Ribeiro, Paulo A.; Zaibag, Muayed Al; Kasab, Saad Al; Idris, Mohamed; Halim, Murtada; Abdullah, Moheeb; Shahed, Maie (1988). "Percutaneous double balloon valvotomy for rheumatic tricuspid stenosis". The American Journal of Cardiology. 61 (8): 660–662. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(88)90790-4. ISSN 0002-9149.
  7. Egred, M.; Albouaini, K.; Morrison, W.L. (2006). "Balloon Valvuloplasty of a Stenosed Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve". Circulation. 113 (18). doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.568238. ISSN 0009-7322.
  8. Patel TM, Dani SI, Shah SC, Patel TK (1996). "Tricuspid balloon valvuloplasty: a more simplified approach using inoue balloon". Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 37 (1): 86–8. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199601)37:1<86::AID-CCD23>3.0.CO;2-T. PMID 8770490.
  9. "Balloon Valvuloplasty for Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve Stenosis".
  10. "StatPearls". 2020. PMID 29763166.
  11. Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Balasubramanian S, Dunning J (2007). "Should the tricuspid valve be replaced with a mechanical or biological valve?". Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 6 (4): 551–7. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.159277. PMID 17669933.
  12. Vassileva CM, Shabosky J, Boley T, Markwell S, Hazelrigg S (2012). "Tricuspid valve surgery: the past 10 years from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 143 (5): 1043–9. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.004. PMID 21872283.