Salivary gland tumor staging: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
|valign=top|
|valign=top|
|+
|+
! style="background: #4479BA; width: 200px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF|Stage}}
! style="background: #4479BA; width: 200px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF|T Classification}}
! style="background: #4479BA; width: 400px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF|Tumor location}}
! style="background: #4479BA; width: 400px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF|Thickness}}
|-
|-
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold" |
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold" |

Revision as of 22:07, 16 November 2015

Salivary gland tumor Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Salivary gland tumor from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB)

Head X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Salivary gland tumor staging On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Salivary gland tumor staging

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Salivary gland tumor staging

CDC on Salivary gland tumor staging

Salivary gland tumor staging in the news

Blogs on Salivary gland tumor staging

Directions to Hospitals Treating Salivary gland tumor

Risk calculators and risk factors for Salivary gland tumor staging

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [2]

Overview

According to the TNM staging system by the American Joint Committee on Cancer, there are four stages of salivary gland cancers based on the tumor size, lymph nodes involved, and metastasis.[1]

Staging

  • The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has designated staging by TNM classification to define salivary gland cancer. In general, tumors of the major salivary glands are staged according to size, extraparenchymal extension, lymph node involvement (in parotid tumors, whether or not the facial nerve is involved), and presence of metastases.
  • Tumors arising in the minor salivary glands are staged according to the anatomic site of origin (e.g., oral cavity and sinuses). Clinical stage, particularly tumor size, may be the critical factor to determine the outcome of salivary gland cancer and may be more important than histologic grade. Diagnostic imaging studies may be used in staging. With excellent spatial resolution and superior soft tissue contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers advantages over computed tomographic scanning in the detection and localization of head and neck tumors. Overall, MRI is the preferred modality for evaluation of suspected neoplasms of the salivary glands.[1]

Primary tumor (T)

T Classification Thickness
TX
Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0
No evidence of a primary tumor
T1
Tumor ≤2 cm in greatest dimension without extraparenchymal extension
T2
Tumor >2 cm but ≤4 cm in greatest dimension without extraparenchymal extension b
T3
Tumor >4 cm and/or tumor having extraparenchymal extension b
T4a
  • Moderately advanced disease.
  • Tumor invades skin, mandible, ear canal, and/or facial nerve
T4b
  • Very advanced disease
  • Tumor invades skull base and/or pterygoid plates and/or encases carotid artery

b Extraparenchymal extension is clinical or macroscopic evidence of invasion of soft tissues. Microscopic evidence alone does not constitute extraparenchymal extension for classification purposes.

Regional Lymph Nodes (N)

N classification Nodal Mass
NX
Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0
No regional lymph node metastasis
N1
Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, ≤3 cm in greatest dimension
N2
  • Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, >3 cm but ≤6 cm in greatest dimension
  • Metastases in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, ≤6 cm in greatest dimension
  • Metastases in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, ≤6 cm in greatest dimension
N2a
  • Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, >3 cm but ≤6 cm in greatest dimension
N2b
  • Metastases in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, ≤6 cm in greatest dimension
N2c
  • Metastases in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, ≤6 cm in greatest dimension
N3
  • Metastases in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, ≤6 cm in greatest dimension

Distant Metastasis (M)

N classification Nodal Mass
M0
No distant metastasis
M1
Distant metastasis

Anatomic Stage/Prognostic Groups

Stage T N M
Stage 1
  • T1
  • N0
  • M0
Stage II
  • T2
  • N0
  • M0
Stage III
  • T3
  • T1
  • T2
  • T3
  • N0
  • N1
  • N1
  • N1
  • M0
  • M0
  • M0
  • M0
Stage IVA
  • T4a
  • T4a
  • T1
  • T2
  • T3
  • T4a
  • N0
  • N1
  • N2
  • N2
  • N2
  • N2
  • M0
  • M0
  • M0
  • M0
  • M0
  • M0
Stage IVB
  • T4b
  • Any T
  • Any N
  • N3
  • M0
  • M0
Stage IVC
  • Any T
  • Any N
  • M1

Tumor grades of salivary gland cancer

  • Grading is a way of classifying salivary cancer cells based on their appearance and behavior when viewed under a microscope. To find out the grade of a tumor, the biopsy sample is examined under a microscope. A grade is given based on how the cancer cells look and behave compared with normal cells (differentiation). This can give the healthcare team an idea of how quickly the cancer may be growing and how likely it is to spread.[2] The grade of salivary gland cancer is based on the degree of differentiation of cells and their rate of growth.
Grade Description
low Well differentiated – slow growing, less likely to spread
Intermediate Moderately well-differentiated
High

poorly differentiated – tend to grow quickly, more likely to spread

  • Grading for salivary gland cancers is used mainly for mucoepidermoid carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, adenocarcinoma NOS, squamous cell carcinomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas. Other salivary gland cancers can also be graded in the same way. Grading plays an important part in planning salivary gland cancer treatment and can also be used to help estimate the prognosis. However, the grade is not the only factor used to predict the future outcome.
  • It must be considered together with staging information. Staging, in particular tumor size, is an important prognostic factor and may be more important than the grade in terms of successful treatment. For example, sometimes a stage I, intermediate or high-grade tumor can be treated with more success than a low-grade tumor that is a stage III.
Low grade Low, intermediate or high grade High grade
Acinic cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) Adenoid cystic carcinoma*
Basal cell adenocarcinoma Mucoepidermoid carcinoma Anaplastic small cell carcinoma
Clear cell carcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Carcinosarcoma
Cystadenocarcinoma Small and large cell undifferentiated carcinoma
Epithelia-myoepithelial carcinoma Salivary duct carcinoma
Mucinous adenocarcinoma Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma
Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA)
  • *Some adenoid cystic carcinomas can also be intermediate grade.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Salivary gland cancer. National cancer institute(2015) http://www.cancer.gov/types/head-and-neck/hp/salivary-gland-treatment-pdq#section/_13 Accessed on November 8, 2015
  2. Grades of salivary gland cancer. Canadian cancer society(2015) http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/salivary-gland/grading/?region=sk Accessed on November 8, 2015

Template:WikiDoc Sources