Reperfusion injury natural history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reperfusion injury Microchapters

Home

Overview

Pathophysiology

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications & Prognosis

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Reperfusion injury natural history On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Reperfusion injury natural history

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Reperfusion injury natural history

CDC on Reperfusion injury natural history

Reperfusion injury natural history in the news

Blogs on Reperfusion injury natural history

Directions to Hospitals Treating Reperfusion injury

Risk calculators and risk factors for Reperfusion injury natural history

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivam Singla, M.D.[2] Anjan K. Chakrabarti, M.D. [3] Kashish Goel, M.D.

Natural History

Reperfusion Injury Natural History

The Ischemia reperfusion injury was first seen in 1955 by sewell while performing ligation of Dog's coronary arteries

Then later Jennings gave the term Myocardial IRI in 1960. He is the first person to name the term Ischemia Reperfusion injury(IRI) on the basis of histological changes in canine myocardium.

Later various terms were given by the scientist depending upon the various organ system involved:

  • In 1968 Ames gave the term Brain IRI
  • 1972 Flore gave the term Kidney IRI
  • Then Modry gave the term Lung IRI in 1978
  • Greenberg gave the term Intestinal IRI in 1981 by his experiment showing reperfusion induced damage in the intestinal mucosal cells of cat after long hours of ischemia.

Ischemic pre-conditioning was first explained by Murry et al. In 1986 he performed a study in dog explaining the importance of ischemia reperfusion in dogs on infarct size reduction.

Ischemic post-conditioning was given by Zhao et al in 2003 and explained this with the help of an experiment showing small episode of Ischemia or reperfusion performed immediately after the resumption of flow following a period of ischemia. They found that this helped in the reduction of infarct size in dogs by up to 40%

Natural History of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

Complications

Complications of IRI

Myocardial stunning: It is mainly defined as an abnormality in the contractile function of myocardium that sometimes persists even after the return of reperfusion and resolution of ischemia. It is mainly due to the release of reactive oxygen species and intracellular calcium overload.

Prognosis

Prognosis in CNS patients

  • Those patients who are identified and treated early, the prognosis is better along with the decreased incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Outcomes usually depend on the timely recognition and prevention of precipitating factors. Hypertension management is most important before it can inflict damage in the form of edema or hemorrhage
  • The prognosis following hemorrhagic transformation is poor. Mortality in such cases is 3663%, and 80% of survivors have significant morbidity.
  • In case of Central nervous system the brain is a very sensitive organ to ischemia and results in death with in 5 minutes of onset of ischemia. Reperfusion is usually beneficial if it is conducted with in very short period of time aster the onset of ischemia but i most of the cases reperfusion leads to the development of cerebral ischemia and hemorrhage resulting in the bad prognosis.
  • Ischemia reperfusion injury in kidneys is mainly associated with the development of high morbidity and mortality, worse prognosis with the involvement of corticomedullary junction.
  • In CVS patients reperfusion injury is mainly associated with Arrhythmias, myocardial stunning, and myocyte death, which mainly results in the occurrence of Myocardial Infarction with a worse prognosis.

References