Paroxysmal AV block: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 76: Line 76:


===Diagnosis===
===Diagnosis===
[[Paroxysmal AV block Initial Approach|Initial Approach]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block history and symptoms|History and Symptoms]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Electrocardiogram|Electrocardiogram, Holter Monitoring, External Loop Recorder]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Implantable Loop Recorder|Implantable Loop Recorder]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Electrophysiologic studies|Electrophysiologic studies]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Vagal Maneuvers,Carotid Sinus Massage and Tilt Table testing|Vagal Maneuvers,Carotid Sinus Massage and Tilt Table testing]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Laboratory Findings and Stimulation tests|Laboratory Findings and Stimulation tests]] |
[[Paroxysmal AV block Initial Approach|Initial Approach]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block history and symptoms|History and Symptoms]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Electrocardiogram|Electrocardiogram, Holter Monitoring, External Loop Recorder]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Implantable Loop Recorder|Implantable Loop Recorder]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Electrophysiologic studies|Electrophysiologic studies]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Vagal Maneuvers :Carotid Sinus Massage and Tilt Table testing|Vagal Maneuvers,Carotid Sinus Massage and Tilt Table testing]] | [[Paroxysmal AV block Laboratory Findings and Stimulation tests|Laboratory Findings and Stimulation tests]] |


==Initial Approach==
==Initial Approach==

Revision as of 14:40, 13 June 2020

Paroxysmal AV block Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Paroxysmal AV block from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Paroxysmal AV block On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Paroxysmal AV block

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Paroxysmal AV block

CDC on Paroxysmal AV block

Paroxysmal AV block in the news

Blogs on Paroxysmal AV block

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Paroxysmal AV block

For patient information, click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Akash Daswaney, M.B.B.S[2]

Synonyms and keywords:

Overview

Historical Perspective

  • There is limited information about the historical perspective of paroxysmal AV block.
  • In 1931, Adolph Sachs et al reported one of the first cases on paroxysmal AV block. The patient had presented with multiple spells of palpitations, hot flashes, dizziness, ringing in the ears, weakness and diaphoresis accompanied by convulsions. During an acute episode, he noticed an irregular ventricular rhythm, irregular complexes and given a time interval of 30 seconds, the ventricle would beat once in the first 15 second window and 4-5 times in the succeeding window. It was noticed that the duration of the block progressively increased until it was present all the time. Mitral valvulitis was put down as the cause of the attack and the fact that a response to atropine does not rule out an intrinsic conduction defect was emphasized. [1]
  • In 1972, Philippe Coumel et al hypothesized that the cause of bradycardia/pause dependent AV block was the spontaneous depolarization of specialized conducting fibers in the late stages of diastole. It was during this ‘zone of opportunity’ that they noticed this ‘AV dissociation’. In this case, they found that the block occurred to be proximal to the division of the His bundle. [2]
  • In 1997. Brignole et al first described EI AVB in a group of 15 syncope patients with an initial negative work up. They fortuitously stumbled upon ECG findings indicating a paroxysmal AV block and reconfirmed this by performing an adenosine triphosphate test in each patient. [3]

Classification

  • Paroxysmal AV Block may be classified according to the cause into three types :
  1. Intrinsic AV Block (I-AVB)
  2. Extrinsic Vagal AV Block (EV- AVB)
  3. Extrinsic Idiopathic AV Block (EI- AVB)[4]


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Paroxysmal AV Block classification based on cause
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intrinsic AV Block (I-AVB): Due to innate structural/ conduction defect
 
 
Extrinsic Vagal AV Block (EV- AVB): Due to vagal surge/reflex
 
 
 
Extrinsic Idiopathic AV Block (EI- AVB) : Due to innately low adenosine plasma levels
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tachycardia Dependent AV Block (TD- AVB)
 
 
Bradcardia/Pause Dependent AV Block (BD- AVB/PD-AVB)
 
 
 
 
 
 

[4]

Pathophysiology

Intrinsic AV Block

  • Intrinsic AV block (I-AVB) is an AV block secondary to an innate anatomical defect.
  • It is hugely recognized on an ECG as an atrial premature beat (APB) or ventricular premature beat (VPB) before and after a variable period of complete AV block/asystole.
    • Sinus rate increase/ decrease prior to the VPB/APB or during the period of asystole further divides it into Tachycardia Dependent AV block (TD-AVB) and Pause/Bradycardia dependent AV block (PD- AVB).
  • Normal cardiac myocytes are associated with a more negative resting membrane potential, an increased amplitude of action potential and a fast depolarizing sodium current.
  • An exact opposite is seen in diseased myocytes responsible for TD- PAVB. An imbalance between inward depolarizing sodium and calcium currents and outward repolarizing potassium currents causes an increase in recovery time and leads to a phenomenon called ‘post-repolarization refractoriness’.
  • Despite repolarization being complete, a stimulus would not be able to induce an action potential.
  • A hypothetical line of thinking that could be attributed to both PD-AVB and TD-AVB is a ‘concealed conduction’ in the intra His Bundle which serves as a source of a delayed escape rhythm, thereby disrupting the refractoriness and recovery time of the surrounding myocytes. This predisposes the patient to fatal complications such as syncope, presyncope, sudden cardiac death and atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular repose rate. [5]
  • Certain studies hypothesize that ventricular or supraventricular impulses reach this ‘concealed conduction’ at a time when there is a local phase 4 block (when sodium channels are inactive.) This subsequent long pause is reflected by the increased H-H interval in EPS studies and confirms an intra His Bundle block (an entity commonly missed and mislabeled as an infra-His Bundle block or AV- block on electrophysiological studies)
  • Much debate surrounds this as it has also been documented that TD- AV/ PD-AV blocks are not related to phase 3 or phase 4 conduction defects, as previously hypothesized. It is related to myocardial ischemia, Mobitz type II block, RBBB and Intra His bundle conduction defects, retrograde ventricular premature beats and anterograde atrial premature beats; all factors that are independent of local phase 4 blocks. [6]

Extrinsic Vagal AV Block

  • An extrinsic vagally mediated AV block (EV-AVB) may occur due to a vagal surge or a condition causing an increase in vagal tone such as during tilt table tesing, carotid sinus massage, coughing, micturition, defecation, swallowing, myocardial infarction, injection of dypramidole and cardiac transplant rejection.
  • It causes SA and AV node slowing and is therefore reflected on the ECG as sinus rate slowing, increasing/irregular PP and PR intervals prior to a period of compete AV block. A heterogenous presentation in terms of Mobitz type I or II and complete heart block may also be noted. This is followed by a period of sinus acceleration.
  • Electrophysiological studies indicate a normal H-H interval and therefore it can be assumed that it does not have any effect on conduction in the bundle of His and is not associated with any anatomic involvement, as seen in intrinsic AV Block. [7]
  • The pathophysiology of EV-AVB may even be related to the autonomic control of the sinus and AV nodes. A parasympathetic predominance over the SA node and sympathetic predominance over the AV node is exerted in a normal autonomic nervous system.
  • A disruption in this regulation may cause parasympathetic bursts and therefore, an AV block. [8]
  • The effect of vagal stimulation depends on the method and intensity of stimulation and the resting sympathetic activity.
  • Vasalva maneuver, carotid sinus massage, water face immersion, tilt table testing may or may not induce an EV- AVB and in some cases a reversal may be seen on atropine administration. [9]

Extrinsic Idiopathic AV Block

  • The pathogenesis of extrinsic idiopathic paroxysmal AV block (EI-AVB) can be correlated to adenosine plasma levels (APL) and increased affinity of adenosine A1 receptors.
  • There is a recurrent history of unexplained syncope, absence of ECG and cardiac abnormalities and a good prognosis.
  • Due to innately low APL values seen in these patients, there is an upregulation of A1 receptors, such that even during a mild transient surge in endogenous adenosine levels, AV block occurs.
  • A1 receptors, which are present more in the AV node than the SA node, impose an antiadrenergic action by antagonizing β1 receptors, the sympathetic nervous system, hyperpolarizing the SA and AV nodes through potassium channels and lowering intracellular cAMP levels.
  • Therefore, in such patients an injection of adenosine or adenosine triphosphate (ATP) may reproduce the attack and adenosine antagonists such as theophylline may be an efficacious treatment option.
  • On an ECG, there is an absence of signs of vagal stimulation, atrial/ventricular premature beats and there may be a presence of narrow QRS complexes prior to the period of complete AV Block/ asystole[10]
  • Certain studies have also noticed genetic polymorphisms in A2A receptors in a population of people experiencing recurrent unexplained syncope.[11]

Causes

Differentiating Paroxysmal AV block from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Diagnosis

Initial Approach | History and Symptoms | Electrocardiogram, Holter Monitoring, External Loop Recorder | Implantable Loop Recorder | Electrophysiologic studies | Vagal Maneuvers,Carotid Sinus Massage and Tilt Table testing | Laboratory Findings and Stimulation tests |

Initial Approach

  • The pathway to conclusively diagnosing a patient with paroxysmal AV block is not straightforward.
  • Since most patients present with a history of recurrent unexplained syncope and fortuitous timing would be required to document classical ECG findings during an acute episode, it would be best to treat it as a diagnosis of exclusion.
  • An initial evaluation strategy of taking a detailed history, physical examination, risk stratification, ECG recording and BP measurement should help decide what investigations should be ordered (based on whether the syncope is cardiac related, reflex/neutrally mediated, secondary to cerebrovascular disease or due to orthostatic hypotension).

IMAGE TO BE INSERTED - INITIAL APPROACH

History and Symptoms

  • History of syncope, presyncope, duration of each episode, number of episodes, activities during the syncopal episode, aggravating or relieving factors, history of past medical illnesses, prodrome/ recovery phase description in terms of signs, symptoms and duration are important points to be addressed whilst taking a history of a syncope patient.
  • A study of 341 syncope patients showed that the time between the first and last syncopal episode being less than 4 years, syncope during effort or supine position, a history of palpitations, convulsions or blurring of vision were important predictors of a cardiac syncope. [12]
  • Similarly, duration of prodrome > 10 seconds history of pallor, nausea, diaphoresis, dizziness, presyncope, abdominal discomfort and time between first and last syncopal episode being more than 4 years were important predictors of a neutrally mediated syncope.[12]
  • Based on a detailed history, one can decide whether a cardiac syncope was secondary to a rhythm dysfunction, structural cause or ischemia related and would warrant a work up of an ECG, Holter monitoring, echocardiography, electrophysiologic study, or an exercise stress test. [12]
  • Similarly, neutrally mediated syncope maybe vasovagal, situational, secondary to increased carotid sinus sensitivity or non classical and orthostatic hypotension may be due to a primary or secondary autonomic failure, secondary to drugs or hypovolemia. This may be further explored by a carotid sinus massage, tilt table testing, adenosine plasma levels or an adenosine triphosphate stimulation test.

Electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, External Loop Recorder

  • According to the European Society of Cardiology, indications for ECG monitoring are as follows :
    1. Immediate in-hospital monitoring (in bed or by telemetry) is indicated in high risk patients.
    2. Holter monitoring should be considered in patients who have frequent syncope or presyncope (more than or equal to 1 episode per week).
    3. External loop recorders should be considered, early after the index event, in patients who have an inter symptom interval of less than or equal to 4 weeks.[13]

Classic ECG Findings seen in the different types of paroxysmal AV Block are as follows : IMAGES TO BE INSETED, 3 ECG IMAGES

  • The SYNARR- Flash study (Monitoring of SYNcopes and/or sustained palpitations of suspected ARRhythmic origin) was one of the first multicentric observational studies wherein 395 patients with a history of unexplained syncope were monitored with an external ECG device for 4 weeks.
    • Based on certain criteria, events were classified as conclusive, significant, suggestive and negative.
    • It was found that diagnostic events were seen more in patients in which ECG recordings were initiated within 15 days from the index syncope and those with a history of supraventricular arrhythmias and frequent events. If the patient remained undiagnosed following this 4 week interval, more invasive modalities like implantable loop recorders (ILR) may be considered. [14]
  • Brignole et al demonstrated that bundle branch block findings on an ECG does not necessarily correlate to a cardiac related/ bradyarrhythmic syncope.
    • Bundle branch block (in particular, a monofasicular block) in a patient with atypical presenting symptoms and advancing age should prompt a physician to think of paroxysmal AV block or a neutrally mediated mechanism being behind the syncope. [15]

Implantable Loop Recorder

  • Implantable loop recorders are useful tools as they help correlate electrical tracings with the patients symptoms during an acute event.
  • By giving an inkling of the etiology of the syncope, it helps guide therapy strategies, such as adopting permanent stimulation devices in patients with paroxysmal AV block. [16]
  • According to the European Society of Cardiology, the indication for implantable loop recorders are as follows :
    1. In the early phase of evaluation in patients with recurrent syncope of uncertain origin, absence of high risk criteria and a high likelihood od recurrence within the battery life of the device/
    2. In patients with suspected or certain reflex syncope presenting with frequent or severe syncopal episodes
    3. In patients whom epilepsy was suspected but the treatment has proven ineffective.
    4. In patients with unexplained falls. "ESC Guidelines on Syncope (Diagnosis and Management of)".
  • The ISSUE (International Study on Syncope of Unknown Etiology) study conducted by Brignole et al monitored 198 patients with an implantable loop recorder and classified the first syncope event following implantation.
    • The ISSUE classification has pathophysiological implications in terms of the event being neutrally mediated (type 1A or type 1B or type 2), due to an intrinsic conduction defect (type 1C), secondary to orthostatic hypotension (type 4A) or a primary cardiac arrhythmia (types 4B, 4C or 4D).[17]

IMAGE TO BE INSERTED - ISSUE CLASSIFICATION

  • The ISSUE 2 study (characterized by a frequently injured elderly population with a history of recurrent syncope) demonstrated the importance of implantable loop recorders (ILR) as a diagnostic modality by showing that the recurrence rate in syncope patients treated with ILR based therapy was much lower than those treated with no-specific therapy.
    • In addition, a recurrence rate of 5% was noted in those treated with cardiac pacing.[18]

Electrophysiologic studies (EPS)

  • The decision to perform an EPS requires a global risk assessment.
  • According to the European Society of Cardiology, indications for EPS are as follows :
    1. In patients with syncope and previous myocardial infarction or other scar related conditions, EPS is indicated when syncope remains unexplained after non- invasive evaluation.
    2. In patients with syncope and asymptomatic sinus bradycardia, EPS may be considered in a few instances where no invasive tests (eg. ECG monitoring) have failed to show a correlation between syncope and bradycardia.
    3. In patients with syncope preceded by sudden and brief palpitations, EPS may be considered when syncope remains unexplained after non invasive evaluation. "ESC Guidelines on Syncope (Diagnosis and Management of)".

EPS guided therapy

    1. In patients with unexplained syncope and bifasicular bundle branch block, a pacemaker is indicated in the presence of either a baseline H-V interval of more than or equal to 70ms, or second or third degree His- Purkinje block during incremental atrial pacing, or with pharmacological challenge.
    2. In patients with unexplained syncope and previous myocardial infarction or scar related condition, it is recommended to manage induction of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia according to the current European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for Ventricular Arrhythmias.
    3. In patients without structural heart disease with syncope preceded by sudden and brief palpitations, it is recommended to manage the induction of rapid SVT or VT, which reproduces hypotensive or spontaneous symptoms, with appropriate therapy according to the current European Society of Cardiology Guidelines.
    4. In patients with syncope and asymptomatic sinus bradycardia, a pacemaker should be considered is a prolonged sinus node recovery time is present."ESC Guidelines on Syncope (Diagnosis and Management of)".
  • A 42 month follow up was performed by Gronda et al in 155 patients, majority of whom had a history of previous syncope.
    • Electrophysiologic study findings of basal HV greater than or equal to 65 ms , HV value greater than or equal to 120 ms or 2nd-3rd degree atrioventricular block during ajmaline test and HV prolonged greater than 10 ms or 2nd-3rd degree atrioventricular block during atrial pacing correlated to an increased risk of developing advanced atrioventricular block below the AV node. [19]

Vagal Maneuvers : Carotid Sinus massage and Tilt Table testing

  • Though not specific,tilt table testing and other vagal maneuvers such as the vasalva maneuver, eye ball pressure and immersing one's face in cold water can be used in the diagnosis of EV-AVB.
  • Having said that, a negative test does not rule out the possibility of an extrinsic vagal paroxysmal AV block.
  • A carotid sinus massage is indicated in patients more than 40 years of age with syncope of unknown origin compatible with reflex mechanism.
    • Carotid sinus sensitivity is confirmed if carotid sinus massage causes bradycardia (asystole) and/or hypotension that reproduce spontaneous symptoms and patients have clinical features compatible with reflex mechanism of syncope. "ESC Guidelines on Syncope (Diagnosis and Management of)".

INSERT IMAGE HERE

Treatment

Medical Therapy | Interventions | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1


Template:WH Template:WS

  1. "Paroxysmal complete auriculo-ventricular heart-block: A case report - ScienceDirect".
  2. "Bradycardia-dependent atrio-ventricular block: Report of two cases of A-V block elicited by premature beats - ScienceDirect".
  3. Brignole M, Gaggioli G, Menozzi C, Gianfranchi L, Bartoletti A, Bottoni N, Lolli G, Oddone D, Del Rosso A, Pellinghelli G (December 1997). "Adenosine-induced atrioventricular block in patients with unexplained syncope: the diagnostic value of ATP testing". Circulation. 96 (11): 3921–7. doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.11.3921. PMID 9403616.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Aste M, Brignole M (December 2017). "Syncope and paroxysmal atrioventricular block". J Arrhythm. 33 (6): 562–567. doi:10.1016/j.joa.2017.03.008. PMID 29255501.
  5. El-Sherif N, Jalife J (October 2009). "Paroxysmal atrioventricular block: are phase 3 and phase 4 block mechanisms or misnomers?". Heart Rhythm. 6 (10): 1514–21. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.06.025. PMC 2877697. PMID 19968933.
  6. Lee S, Wellens HJ, Josephson ME (August 2009). "Paroxysmal atrioventricular block". Heart Rhythm. 6 (8): 1229–34. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.001. PMID 19632639.
  7. Alboni P, Holz A, Brignole M (July 2013). "Vagally mediated atrioventricular block: pathophysiology and diagnosis". Heart. 99 (13): 904–8. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303220.
  8. "(PDF) Spontaneous paroxysmal atrioventricular block in patients with positive tilt tests and negative electrophysiologic studies | Ivan Mendoza - Academia.edu".
  9. "Paroxysmal vagally mediated av block with recurrent syncope - Talwar - 1985 - Clinical Cardiology - Wiley Online Library".
  10. Brignole M, Deharo JC, Guieu R (August 2015). "Syncope and Idiopathic (Paroxysmal) AV Block". Cardiol Clin. 33 (3): 441–7. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2015.04.012. PMID 26115830.
  11. Saadjian AY, Gerolami V, Giorgi R, Mercier L, Berge-Lefranc JL, Paganelli F, Ibrahim Z, By Y, Guéant JL, Lévy S, Guieu RP (June 2009). "Head-up tilt induced syncope and adenosine A2A receptor gene polymorphism". Eur. Heart J. 30 (12): 1510–5. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp126. PMID 19386617.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Alboni P, Brignole M, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Del Rosso A, Dinelli M, Solano A, Bottoni N (June 2001). "Diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or without heart disease". J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37 (7): 1921–8. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01241-4. PMID 11401133.
  13. "ESC Guidelines on Syncope (Diagnosis and Management of)".
  14. Locati ET, Moya A, Oliveira M, Tanner H, Willems R, Lunati M, Brignole M (August 2016). "External prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring in unexplained syncope and palpitations: results of the SYNARR-Flash study". Europace. 18 (8): 1265–72. doi:10.1093/europace/euv311. PMC 4974630. PMID 26519025.
  15. Donateo P, Brignole M, Alboni P, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Del Rosso A, Dinelli M, Solano A, Bottoni N, Croci F (October 2002). "A standardized conventional evaluation of the mechanism of syncope in patients with bundle branch block". Europace. 4 (4): 357–60. doi:10.1053/eupc.2002.0265. PMID 12408253.
  16. Guerrero-Márquez FJ, Arana-Rueda E, Pedrote A (2016). "Idiopathic Paroxysmal Atrio-Ventricular Block. What is The Mechanism?". J Atr Fibrillation. 9 (3): 1449. doi:10.4022/jafib.1449. PMC 5368548. PMID 28496928.
  17. Brignole M, Moya A, Menozzi C, Garcia-Civera R, Sutton R (2005). "Proposed electrocardiographic classification of spontaneous syncope documented by an implantable loop recorder". Europace. 7 (1): 14–8. doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2004.11.001. PMID 15670961.
  18. Brignole M, Sutton R, Menozzi C, Garcia-Civera R, Moya A, Wieling W; et al. (2006). "Early application of an implantable loop recorder allows effective specific therapy in patients with recurrent suspected neurally mediated syncope". Eur Heart J. 27 (9): 1085–92. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi842. PMID 16569653.
  19. Gronda M, Magnani A, Occhetta E, Sauro G, D'Aulerio M, Carfora A; et al. (1984). "Electrophysiological study of atrio-ventricular block and ventricular conduction defects. Prognostic and therapeutical implications". G Ital Cardiol. 14 (10): 768–73. PMID 6519386.