Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 55: Line 55:
*There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of [disease name].
*There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of [disease name].


==References==
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}

Revision as of 02:18, 21 November 2017


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Pancreatic cancer Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pancreatic Cancer from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Staging

Diagnostic study of choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice

CDC on Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice

Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice in the news

Blogs on Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pancreatic cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pancreatic cancer diagnostic study of choice

Overview

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Gold standard/Study of choice:

By Hellerhoff (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons


Diagnostic Criteria

  • Here you should describe the details of the diagnostic criteria.
  • Always mention the name of the criteria/definition you are about to list (e.g. modified Duke criteria for diagnosis of endocarditis / 3rd universal definition of MI) and cite the primary source of where this criteria/definition is found.
  • Although not necessary, it is recommended that you include the criteria in a table. Make sure you always cite the source of the content and whether the table has been adapted from another source.
  • Be very clear as to the number of criteria (or threshold) that needs to be met out of the total number of criteria.
  • Distinguish criteria based on their nature (e.g. clinical criteria / pathological criteria/ imaging criteria) before discussing them in details.
  • To view an example (endocarditis diagnostic criteria), click here
  • If relevant, add additional information that might help the reader distinguish various criteria or the evolution of criteria (e.g. original criteria vs. modified criteria).
  • You may also add information about the sensitivity and specificity of the criteria, the pre-test probability, and other figures that may help the reader understand how valuable the criteria are clinically.
  • [Disease name] is mainly diagnosed based on clinical presentation. There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of [disease name].
  • There is no single diagnostic study of choice for [disease name], though [disease name] may be diagnosed based on [name of criteria] established by [...].
  • The diagnosis of [disease name] is made when at least [number] of the following [number] diagnostic criteria are met: [criterion 1], [criterion 2], [criterion 3], and [criterion 4].
  • The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [criteria name] criteria, which includes [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].
  • [Disease name] may be diagnosed at any time if one or more of the following criteria are met:
    • Criteria 1
    • Criteria 2
    • Criteria 3

IF there are clear, established diagnostic criteria:

  • The diagnosis of [disease name] is made when at least [number] of the following [number] diagnostic criteria are met: [criterion 1], [criterion 2], [criterion 3], and [criterion 4].
  • The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [criteria name] criteria, which include [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].
  • The diagnosis of [disease name] is based on the [definition name] definition, which includes [criterion 1], [criterion 2], and [criterion 3].

IF there are no established diagnostic criteria: 

  • There are no established criteria for the diagnosis of [disease name].

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lee ES, Lee JM (2014). "Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a state-of-the-art review". World J Gastroenterol. 20 (24): 7864–77. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7864. PMC 4069314. PMID 24976723.
  2. Brennan DD, Zamboni GA, Raptopoulos VD, Kruskal JB (2007). "Comprehensive preoperative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 64-section volumetric CT". Radiographics. 27 (6): 1653–66. doi:10.1148/rg.276075034. PMID 18025509.
  3. Horwhat JD, Gerke H, Acosta RD, Pavey DA, Jowell PS (2009). "Focal or diffuse "fullness" of the pancreas on CT. Usually benign, but EUS plus/minus FNA is warranted to identify malignancy". JOP. 10 (1): 37–42. PMID 19129613.
  4. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Traverso LW (1988). "Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT". Radiology. 166 (1 Pt 1): 125–33. doi:10.1148/radiology.166.1.2827228. PMID 2827228.
  5. Karasawa E, Goldberg HI, Moss AA, Federle MP, London SS (1983). "CT pancreatogram in carcinoma of the pancreas and chronic pancreatitis". Radiology. 148 (2): 489–93. doi:10.1148/radiology.148.2.6867347. PMID 6867347.
  6. Raptopoulos V, Steer ML, Sheiman RG, Vrachliotis TG, Gougoutas CA, Movson JS (1997). "The use of helical CT and CT angiography to predict vascular involvement from pancreatic cancer: correlation with findings at surgery". AJR Am J Roentgenol. 168 (4): 971–7. doi:10.2214/ajr.168.4.9124153. PMID 9124153.
  7. Asagi A, Ohta K, Nasu J, Tanada M, Nadano S, Nishimura R; et al. (2013). "Utility of contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT in the clinical management of pancreatic cancer: impact on diagnosis, staging, evaluation of treatment response, and detection of recurrence". Pancreas. 42 (1): 11–9. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182550d77. PMID 22699206.


Template:WikiDoc Sources