CHADS2 score

Revision as of 22:11, 18 November 2010 by C Michael Gibson (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiDoc Resources for CHADS2 score

Articles

Most recent articles on CHADS2 score

Most cited articles on CHADS2 score

Review articles on CHADS2 score

Articles on CHADS2 score in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on CHADS2 score

Images of CHADS2 score

Photos of CHADS2 score

Podcasts & MP3s on CHADS2 score

Videos on CHADS2 score

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on CHADS2 score

Bandolier on CHADS2 score

TRIP on CHADS2 score

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on CHADS2 score at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on CHADS2 score

Clinical Trials on CHADS2 score at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on CHADS2 score

NICE Guidance on CHADS2 score

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on CHADS2 score

CDC on CHADS2 score

Books

Books on CHADS2 score

News

CHADS2 score in the news

Be alerted to news on CHADS2 score

News trends on CHADS2 score

Commentary

Blogs on CHADS2 score

Definitions

Definitions of CHADS2 score

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on CHADS2 score

Discussion groups on CHADS2 score

Patient Handouts on CHADS2 score

Directions to Hospitals Treating CHADS2 score

Risk calculators and risk factors for CHADS2 score

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of CHADS2 score

Causes & Risk Factors for CHADS2 score

Diagnostic studies for CHADS2 score

Treatment of CHADS2 score

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on CHADS2 score

International

CHADS2 score en Espanol

CHADS2 score en Francais

Business

CHADS2 score in the Marketplace

Patents on CHADS2 score

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to CHADS2 score

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Please Join in Editing This Page and Apply to be an Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Condition Points
 C   Congestive heart failure
1
 H  Hypertension: blood pressure consistently above 140/90 mmHg (or treated hypertension on medication)
1
 A  Age >/=75 years
1
 D  Diabetes Mellitus
1
 S2  Prior Stroke or TIA
2

CHADS score or CHADS2 score is a clinical prediction rule for estimating the risk of stroke in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF), a common and serious heart arrhythmia associated with thromboembolic stroke. It is used to determine whether or not treatment is required with anticoagulation therapy or antiplatelet therapy,[1] since AF can cause stasis of blood in the upper heart chambers, leading to the formation of a mural thrombus that can dislodge into the blood flow, reach the brain, cut off blood supply to the brain, and cause a stroke. A high CHADS2 score corresponds to a greater risk of stroke, while a low CHADS2 score corresponds to a lower risk of stroke. The CHADS2 score was validated by a study of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation patients aged 65 to 95 who were not prescribed the anticoagulant warfarin.[2]

Method

The CHADS2 scoring table is shown above:[3]

Adding together the points that correspond to the conditions that a patient has will result in the CHADS2 score. This score is used in the next section to estimate stroke risk.

Risk of stroke

Annual Stroke Risk[2]
CHADS2 Score   Stroke Risk %       95% CI      
0
1.9
 1.2–3.0
1
2.8
 2.0–3.8
2
4.0
 3.1–5.1
3
5.9
 4.6–7.3
4
8.5
 6.3–11.1
5
12.5
 8.2–17.5
6
18.2
10.5–27.4

According to the findings of the validation study, the risk of stroke as a percentage per year is:

However, warfarin has its own stroke risk[4] and other drawbacks, which were considered in developing the recommendations of the next section.

The CHADS2 score has various limitations, which have been debated [5]. Notably, many stroke risk factors have not been included, and whilst simple, the score has only modest predictive value for thromboembolism.


To complement the CHADS2 score, by the inclusion of additional 'stroke risk modifier' risk factors, the CHA2DS2-VASc score has been proposed [6]. These additional 'clinically relevant non-major' stroke risk factors include age 65-74, female gender and vascular disease. In the CHA2DS2-VASc score score, 'age 75 and above' also has extra weight, with 2 points.

The CHA2DS2-VASc score has been used in the new European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation [7].

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend that if the patient has a CHADS2 score of 2 and above, oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC, eg. with warfarin(INR2-3) or one of the new OAC drugs, such as dabigatran)should be prescribed.

If the CHADS2 score is 0-1, other stroke risk modifiers should be considered: (i) If we have 2 or more risk factors (essentially a CHA2DS2-VASc score score of 2 or more), OAC is recommended; and (ii) If we have 1 risk factor (essentially a CHA2DS2-VASc score score=1), antithrombotic therapy with OAC or aspirin (OAC preferred) is recommended, and patient values and preferences should be considered.

If patients have a CHA2DS2-VASc score score=0, such patients are ‘truly low risk’[8], and thus, the ESC guideline recommendation is to prescribe either aspirin or no antithrombotic therapy, but 'no antithrombotic therapy' is preferred[9].



Anticoagulation based on the CHADS2 score

Score Risk Anticoagulation Therapy Considerations
0 Low Aspirin Aspirin daily
1 Moderate Aspirin or Warfarin Aspirin daily or raise INR to 2.0-3.0, depending on factors such as patient preference
2 or greater Moderate or High Warfarin Raise INR to 2.0-3.0, unless contraindicated (e.g. clinically significant GI bleeding, inability to obtain regular INR screening)

The following treatment strategies were recommended in the table to the right:[1][2]

For detailed recommendations on how the treatment recommendations based on the CHADS2 score are modified by considering additional 'stroke risk modifier' risk factors using the CHA2DS2-VASc score, see ESC guideline recommendations.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Gage BF, van Walraven C, Pearce L; et al. (2004). "Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation: stroke risk stratification in patients taking aspirin". Circulation. 110 (16): 2287&ndash, 92. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000145172.55640.93. PMID 15477396.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ (2001). "Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation". JAMA. 285 (22): 2864–70. PMID 11401607.
  3. "Risk of Stroke with AF". VA Palo Alto Medical Center and at Stanford University: the Sportsmedicine Program and the Cardiomyopathy Clinic. Retrieved 2007-09-14.
  4. Steiner, Thorsten (2006). "Intracerebral hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant therapy: current practices and unresolved questions". Stroke. 37 (1): 256–62. PMID 16339459 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000196989.09900.f8. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  5. Karthikeyan G, Eikelboom JW. The CHADS2 score for stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation--friend or foe? Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jul 5;104(1):45-8.
  6. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010 Feb;137(2):263-72.
  7. European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, Al-Attar N, Hindricks G, Prendergast B, Heidbuchel H, Alfieri O, Angelini A, Atar D, Colonna P, De Caterina R, De Sutter J, Goette A, Gorenek B, Heldal M, Hohloser SH, Kolh P, Le Heuzey JY, Ponikowski P, Rutten FH. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(19):2369-429.
  8. Van Staa TP, Setakis E, Di Tanna GL, Lane DA, Lip GY. A comparison of risk stratification schema for stroke in 79884 atrial fibrillation patients in general practice. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct 1. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04085.x. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21029359.
  9. Lip GY, Halperin JL. Improving stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2010 Jun;123(6):484-8.

[[Category:Cardiology]

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources