Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
==Classification==
==Classification==


 
The diagnosis of ALPS is currently based on the presence of 2 required and 6 additional criteria. Required criteria include the presence of chronic lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly and elevated circulating TCRαβ+ DNT cells. Additional criteria are further divided into primary and secondary categories (Table 2). An abnormal lymphocyte apoptosis assay and the presence of pathogenic mutations in genes of the FAS pathway are the primary additional criteria. Secondary additional criteria consist of elevated circulating biomarkers, characteristic histopathology, and family history compatible with ALPS. For a definitive ALPS diagnosis, a patient has to meet both required criteria and either of the 2 primary additional criteria (Table 2). A probable ALPS diagnosis can be entertained if both the required criteria and any one of the secondary additional criteria 3, 4, 5, or 6 are present. Patients with probable ALPS should be treated and monitored in the same way as patients with a definitive diagnosis, but treating physicians are advised to pursue a genetic or apoptosis assay-based diagnostic workup whenever possible.
 


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 02:10, 6 August 2021

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification

CDC on Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification in the news

Blogs on Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification

Directions to Hospitals Treating Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome

Risk calculators and risk factors for Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: David Teachey, MD [2] Sharmi Biswas, M.B.B.S

Overview

Classification

The diagnosis of ALPS is currently based on the presence of 2 required and 6 additional criteria. Required criteria include the presence of chronic lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly and elevated circulating TCRαβ+ DNT cells. Additional criteria are further divided into primary and secondary categories (Table 2). An abnormal lymphocyte apoptosis assay and the presence of pathogenic mutations in genes of the FAS pathway are the primary additional criteria. Secondary additional criteria consist of elevated circulating biomarkers, characteristic histopathology, and family history compatible with ALPS. For a definitive ALPS diagnosis, a patient has to meet both required criteria and either of the 2 primary additional criteria (Table 2). A probable ALPS diagnosis can be entertained if both the required criteria and any one of the secondary additional criteria 3, 4, 5, or 6 are present. Patients with probable ALPS should be treated and monitored in the same way as patients with a definitive diagnosis, but treating physicians are advised to pursue a genetic or apoptosis assay-based diagnostic workup whenever possible.

References