Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis

Revision as of 16:52, 13 October 2016 by Sara Mehrsefat (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sexually transmitted diseases Main Page

Vaginitis Main Page

Bacterial vaginosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Bacterial vaginosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Amsel Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis

CDC on Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis

Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis in the news

Blogs on Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis

Directions to Hospitals Treating Bacterial vaginosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Bacterial vaginosis differential diagnosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mehrsefat, M.D. [2]

Overview

Bacterial vaginosis must be differentiated from other diseases that cause purulent, malodorous, thin vaginal discharge with elevatedvaginal PH (<4.5) such as trichomoniasis, atrophic vaginitis, and desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. additionally bacterial vaginosis also must be differentiated other conditions such as from vaginal candidiasis, vaginitis and cervicitis.

Differential Diagnosis

Bacterial vaginosis diagnosis is unlikely In the absence of following findings:

Bacterial vaginosis must be differentiated from:[1][2][3][4]

Disease Findings
Trichomoniasis
  • Presents with purulent, malodorous, thin discharge associated with burning, pruritus, and dysuria, with the sign of vaginal inflammation and elevated vaginal pH (>4.5)
  • Motile trichomonads on wet mount
  • Positive culture (Gold standard)
  • Positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)
Atrophic vaginitis
  • Progressive symptoms
  • Presents with yellow and malodorous vaginal discharge, vaginal dryness, postcoital bleeding, and dyspareunia with the sign of vaginal inflammation and elevated vaginal pH (>5)
  • Diagnosis is critical and laboratory tests can confirm hypoestrogenic state
Desquamative inflammatory vaginitis
  • Chronic clinical syndrome with unknown etiology
  • Presents with dyspareunia, dyspareunia, yellow, grey, or green profuse vaginal discharge with the sign of vaginal inflammation and elevated vaginal pH (>4.5)
  • Microscopy shows large number of parabasal (immature squamous epithelial cells) and inflammatory cells
vaginal candidiasis
  • Presents with vulvar pruritus and cottage cheese-like vaginal discharge with no or minimal odor with normal vaginal pH (4-4.5)
  • presence of Candida on wet mount (adding 10% KOH destroys the cellular elements and facilitates recognition of budding yeast, pseudohyphae, and hyphae)
trichomoniasis, atrophic vaginitis, and desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. These four entities are easily distinguishable by clinical and microscopic features.

●Women with BV do not have dyspareunia or signs of vaginal inflammation; in contrast, women with atrophic vaginitis, desquamative inflammatory vaginitis, and trichomoniasis usually have these signs and symptoms. ●Both atrophic vaginitis and desquamative inflammatory vaginitis are associated with an increased number of parabasal cells on microscopy, which is not observed in women with BV. ●A large number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes on microscopy are characteristic of desquamative inflammatory vaginitis, trichomoniasis, and atrophic vaginitis with infection, but not BV. ●Visualization of trichomonads readily makes the diagnosis of trichomoniasis in the setting of an elevated pH, however, in other cases, we suggest using more sensitive and specific diagnostic tests to diagnose or exclude trichomoniasis.

References

  1. Bachmann GA, Nevadunsky NS (2000). "Diagnosis and treatment of atrophic vaginitis". Am Fam Physician. 61 (10): 3090–6. PMID 10839558.
  2. Krieger JN, Tam MR, Stevens CE, Nielsen IO, Hale J, Kiviat NB; et al. (1988). "Diagnosis of trichomoniasis. Comparison of conventional wet-mount examination with cytologic studies, cultures, and monoclonal antibody staining of direct specimens". JAMA. 259 (8): 1223–7. PMID 2448502.
  3. Sobel JD, Reichman O, Misra D, Yoo W (2011). "Prognosis and treatment of desquamative inflammatory vaginitis". Obstet Gynecol. 117 (4): 850–5. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182117c9e. PMID 21422855.
  4. Eckert LO, Hawes SE, Stevens CE, Koutsky LA, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK (1998). "Vulvovaginal candidiasis: clinical manifestations, risk factors, management algorithm". Obstet Gynecol. 92 (5): 757–65. PMID 9794664.


Template:WH Template:WS