Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sexually transmitted diseases Main Page

Vaginitis Main Page

Bacterial vaginosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Bacterial vaginosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Amsel Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective

CDC on Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective

Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Bacterial vaginosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Bacterial vaginosis historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mehrsefat, M.D. [2]

Ovrview

In 1892, Albert Döderlein first described the hypothesis that bacterial flora may be a cause of vaginal infectious conditions. In 1955, Gardner and Dukes first named Haemophilus vaginalis (gardnerella vaginalis) as a new genus and the cause of the foul-smelling, watery vaginal discharge associated with BV.[1][2]

Historical perspective

  • In 1780, Scheele discovered a gram-positive facultative anaerobic bacteria, lactobacillus spp. in sour milk.
  • in 1858, Folwarczny subsequently discovered lactobacillus spp. in humans.
  • In 1892, Albert Döderlein first described the hypothesis that bacterial flora may be a cause of vaginal infectious conditions.
  • In 1921, Schröder developed a set of three lactobacillary grades.[1]
  • Up to the 1950s, the exact etiology of lactobacillary deficiency was still uncertain, and symptomatic women with lactobacillary grade III were diagnosed with vaginitis.
  • In 1955, the newly discovered bacterium (‘Haemophilus vaginalis’) was first named by Gardner and Dukes. They thought their newly discovered bacterium belonged to the Haemophilus group, but soon afterwards gardnerella vaginalis was named as a new genus—and the cause of the foul-smelling, watery vaginal discharge associated with BV.[2]
  • In 1980, Haemophilus vaginalis was renamed as a gardnerella vaginalis (in honor of Gardner) by Greenwood and Pickett, after it became apparent that Haemophilus vaginalis did not belong to the genus haemophilus.[3]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Donders GG (2007). "Definition and classification of abnormal vaginal flora". Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 21 (3): 355–73. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.01.002. PMID 17434799.
  2. 2.0 2.1 GARDNER HL, DUKES CD (1955). "Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis: a newly defined specific infection previously classified non-specific vaginitis". Am J Obstet Gynecol. 69 (5): 962–76. PMID 14361525.
  3. Greenwood JR, Pickett MJ. Transfer of Haemophilus vaginalis Gardner and Dukes to a new genus, Gardnerella: G. vaginalis (Gardner and Dukes) Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30:170–8. doi: 10.1099/00207713-30-1-170.

Template:WH Template:WS