Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor: Difference between revisions
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Pathology== | ==Pathology== | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 7 September 2012
Template:DiseaseDisorder infobox
|
Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor from other Diseases |
|---|
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a rare tumor usually diagnosed in childhood. Although usually a brain tumor, AT/RT can occur anywhere in the central nervous system (CNS) including the spinal cord. About 60% will be in the posterior cranial fossa (particularly the cerebellum). One review estimated 52% posterior fossa (PF), 39% sPNET (supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors), 5% pineal, 2% spinal, and 2% multi-focal.[1]
Genetics
Pathology
AT/RT and rhabdoid tumor share the term "rhabdoid" because under a microscope both tumors resemble rhabdomyosarcoma.
Histology
The tumor histology is jumbled small and large cells. The tissue of this tumor contains many different types of cells including the rhabdoid cells, large spindled cell, epithelial and mesenchymal cells and areas resembling primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). As much as 70% of the tumor may be made up of PNET-like cells. Ultrastructure characteristic whorls of intermediate filaments in the rhabdoid tumors (as with rhabdoid tumors in any area of the body). Ho and associates found sickle-shaped embracing cells, previously unreported, in all of 11 cases of AT/RT.[2]
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry refers to the process of localizing proteins in cells of a tissue section exploiting the principle of antibodies binding specifically to antigens in biological tissues. A tissue sample is stained to identify specific cellular proteins. Immunohistochemical staining is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Specific molecular markers are characteristic of particular cancer types. Immunohistochemistry is also widely used in basic research to understand the distribution and localization of biomarkers in different parts of a tissue. Proteins found in an Atypical Teratoid Rhaboid Tumor are:
- Vimentin-positive
- Cytokeratin-positive
- Neuron specific enolase-positive
- Epitelial membrane antigen-positive
- Glial fibrillary acidic protein- positive
- Synaptophysin
- Chromogranin
- Smooth muscle actin
- Desmin
- Carcinoembrionary antigen
- CD99 antigen;[3][4]
- S-100
- neurofilaments
- AFP – not found
- HCG – negative
Cytogenetic studies
Cytogenetics is the study of a tumor’s genetic make-up. A technique called FISH may be able to help locate a mutation or abnormality that may be allowing tumor growth.[5] This technique has been shown to be useful in identifying some tumors and distinguishing two histologically similar tumors from each other (such as AT/RTs and PNETs). In particular, medulloblastmas/PNETs may possibly be differentiated cytogenetically from AT/RTs as chromosomal deletions of 17p are relatively common with medulloblastoma and abnormalities of 22q11.2 are not seen. On the other hand, chromosomal 22 deletions are very comomon in AT/RTs.
In importance of the hSNF5/INI1 gene located on chromosomal band 22q11.2 is highlighted in the summary paper form the Workshop on Childhood Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors as the mutation’s presence is sufficient to change the diagnosis from a medulloblastoma or PNET to the more aggressive AT/RT classification. However, it should be noted that this mutation is not present in 100% of cases. Therefore, if the mutation is not present in an otherwise classic AT/RT immunohistochemical and morphologic pattern then the diagnosis remains an AT/RT.
Diagnosis
The standard work-up for AT/RT includes:
- MRI Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine
- LP (Lumbar puncture) to look for M1 disease
- CT (Computed tomography) of chest and abdomen to check for a tumor
- BMA (Bone Marrow Asperant) to check for bone tumors. Often a doctor will want perform a stem cell transplant
- BX Bone marrow biopsy
- Bone scan
The initial diagnosis of a tumor is made with a radiographic study (MRI[6] or CT-). If CT was performed first, a MRI is usually performed as the images are often more detailed and may reveal previously undetected metastatic tumors in other locations of the brain. In addition, an MRI of the spine is usually performed. The AT/RT tumor often spreads to the spine. It is difficult to diagnosis AT/RT only from radiographic study; usually a pathologist must perform a cytological or genetic analysis.
Examination of the cerebrospinal fluid is important as one-third of patients will have intracranial dissemination with involvement of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Large tumor cells, eccentricity of the nuclei and prominent nucleoli are consistent findings.[7] Usually only a minority of AT/RT biopsies have Rhabdoid cells, making diagnosis more difficult. Increasingly it is recommended that a genetic analysis be performed on the brain tumor, especially to find if a deletion in the INI1/hSNF5 gene is involved (appears to account for over 80% of the cases). The correct diagnosis of the tumor is critical to any protocol. Studies have shown that 8% to over 50% of AT/RT tumors are diagnosed incorrectly.
Differential diagnosis
The critical step in treatment planning is to determine the correct histology of the tumor. Misidentification of the tumor histology can lead to errors in treatment and prognosis.[8]
Atypical teratoid/rhaboid tumor closely resembles medulloblastoma,[9] primitive neuroectodermal tumor, choroid plexus carcinoma, and some kinds of germ cell tumor. Because rhabdoid characteristics are not the only component of AT/RT, some sections of an AT/RT may resemble other tumors. These characteristics may be present only in focal areas or may be less pronounced.
It is important to consider AT/RT when a medulloblastoma or PNET is suspected, particularly in a child under the age of one. Cytogenetic studies can assist in differentiating MB/PNETs from AT/RTs. Some kinds of germ cell tumor secrete tumor markers AFP or bHCG; AT/RTs do not.
Compared to medulloblastoma, AT/RT has a significantly worse prognosis. AT/RT occurs in young children (often younger than three years) who are difficult to evaluate, it is resistant to many current therapies, and its recurrence is fast.
Appearance on radiologic exam
AT/RTs can occur at any sites within the CNS, however, approximately 60% are located in the posterior fossa or cerebellar area. The ASCO study showed 52% posterior fossa (PF); 39% sPNET (supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors); 5% pineal; 2% spinal, and 2% multi-focal.[1]
The tumors' appearance on CT and MRI are nonspecific, tending towards large size, calcifications, necrosis (tissue death),and hemorrhage (bleeding). Radiological studies alone cannot identify AT/RT; a pathologist almost always has to evaluate a brain tissue sample.
The increased cellularity of the tumor may make the appearance on an uncontrasted CT to have increased attenuation. Solid parts of the tumor often enhance with contrast MRI finding on T1 and T2 weighted images are variable. Pre-contrast T2 weighted images may show an iso-signal or slightly hyper-signal. Solid components of the tumor may enhance with contrast but do not always. MRI studies appear to be more able to pick up metastatic foci in other intracranial locations as well as intraspinal locations.
Preoperative and followup studies are needed to detect metastatic disease.
Treatment
Surgical option
Surgery plays a critical role in obtaining tissue to make an accurate diagnosis. Surgery alone is not curative. In addition, 30% of the AT/RTs are located supratentorially and there is a predilection for the cerebello-pontine angle[10] which makes surgical resection difficult. One-third or more children will have disseminated disease at the time of diagnosis. Total or near-total resections are often not possible.
Chemotherapy options
Approximately 50% of the AT/RTs will transiently respond, but Chemotherapy by itself is rarely curative. There is no standard treatment for AT/RT. Various chemotherapeutic agents have been used against AT/RTs which are also used against other CNS tumors including cisplatinum, carboplatinum, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and etoposide. Some Chemotherapy protocols are listed below:
- CCG clinical trial CCG-9921 was activated in 1993 and published its results in 2005. The proposed treatments did not have different outcomes and were not an improvement on prior treatments.[11] Geyer published a review of chemotherapy on 299 infants with CNS tumors that evaluated response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and toxicity of two chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of children younger than 36 months with malignant brain tumors. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two regimens of induction chemotherapy (vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide v vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide). Intensified induction chemotherapy resulted in a high response rate of malignant brain tumors in infants. Survival was comparable to that of previous studies, and most patients who survived did not receive radiation therapy.[11]
- Sarcoma protocols. There has been at least one report in the literature of malignant rhabdoid tumors of the CNS being treated in as a high-grade intracranial sarcoma. These three cases were treated with surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and triple intrathecal chemotherapy similar to the Intergroup Rhadbdomyoscarcoma Study III guidelines.[12]
- Intrathecal protocols. One of the difficulties with brain and spinal tumors is that the blood brain barrier needs to be crossed so that the drug can get to the tumor. One mechanism to deliver the drug is through a device called an Ommaya reservoir. This is a device which shares some characteristics with a shunt in which a tube a surgically placed in the fluid surrounding the brain and a bulb shaped reservoir attached to the tubing is placed under the skin of the scalp. When the child is to receive intrathecal chemotherapy, the drug is administered into this bulb reservoir. At other times intrathecal chemotherapeutic agents are delivered through a lumbar puncture (spinal tap). A current Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Protocol uses intrathecal mafosfamide, a pre-activated cyclophosphamidederivative, in addition to other modalities to try to effect this tumor.[13]
- High dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. This therapy uses chemotherapy at doses high enough to completely suppress the bone marrow. Prior to instituting this therapy, the child has a central line placed and stem cells are gathered. After therapy these cells are given back to the child to regrow the bone marrow. Stem cell rescue or autologous bone marrow transplantation, was initially thought to be of benefit to a wide group of patients, but has declined over the history of chemotherapy protocols. A general description of stem cell rescue is available.[14] In addition, there are some reports that it is effective with select cancers and this includes AT/RT.[15]
Radiation options
The traditional practice for childhood brain tumors has been to use chemotherapy to defer radiation therapy until a child is older than three years. This strategy is based upon observations that children under three have significant long term complications as a result of brain irradiation. However, the long term outcomes of AT/RT are so poor that protocols call for upfront radiation therapy, often in spite of young age.[16]
The dose and volume of radiation had not been standardized, however, radiation does appear to improve survival. The use of radiation has been limited in children younger than three because of the risk of severe neurocognitive deficits. There are protocols using conformal, local radiation in the young child to try to cure this tumor.
External beam (conformal) radiation uses several fields that beam intersects at the tumor location; the normal brain tissue receives less radiation and hopefully is at less impact on cognitive function.
Proton beam radiation was only offered at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and at Loma Linda, California as of 2002. Since 2003 three or four more proton therapy centers have opened in the United States.[17][18][19][20][21][22]
Chromatin re-modeling agents
This protocol is still in pre-clinical evaluation. HDAC inhibitors are a new class of anticancer agents targeted directly at chromatin remodeling. These agents have been used in acute promyelocytic leukemia and have been found to affect the HDAC-mediated transcriptional repression. There is too little understanding of the INI1 deficiency to predict whether HDAC inhibitors will be effective against AT/RTs. There are some laboratory results that indicate it is effective against certain AT/RT cell lines.[23]
Prognosis
The prognosis for AT/RT is very poor, although there are some indications that an IRSIII-based therapy can produce long-term survival (60 to 72 months). Two-year survival is less than 20%, average survival postoperatively is 11 months, and doctors recommend palliative care, especially with younger children because of the poor outcomes.
Patients with metastasis (disseminated tumor), larger tumors, tumors that could not be fully removed, tumor reoccurrence, and were younger than 36 months had the worse outcomes (i.e., shorter survival times).
A retrospective survey from 36 AT/RT St. Jude Children's Hospital patients from 1984 to 2004 found a less than 10% survival rate in children under three, but a 70% survival rate in older children.[24] A retrospective register at the Cleveland Children's hospital on 42 AT/RT patients found median survival time is 16.25 months and a survival rate around 33%. One-quarter of these cases did not show the mutation in the INI1/hSNF5 gene.
The longest term survivals reported in the literature are:
- (a) Hilden and associates reported a child who was still free from disease at 46 months from diagnosis.[25]
- (b) Olson and associates reported a child who was disease free at five years from diagnosis based on the IRS III protocol. [26]
- (c) In 2003 Hirth reported a case who had been disease free for over six years.[27]
- (d) Zimmerman in 2005 reported 50-to-72 month survival rates on four patients using an IRS III-based protocol. Two of these LT survivors had been treated after an AT/RT reoccurrence.[28]
- (e) A NYU study (Gardner 2004) has 4 of 12 longer term AT/RT survivors; the oldest was alive at 46 months after diagnosis.[29]
- (f) Aurélie Fabre, 2004, reported a 16-year survivor of a soft-tissue rhabdoid tumor.[30]
Cancer treatments in long-term survivors who are children usually cause a series of negative effects on physical well being, fertility, cognition, and learning.[31][32][33][34]
Metastasis
Metastatic spread is noted in approximately one-third of the AT/RT cases at the time of diagnosis and tumors can occur anywhere throughout the CNS. The ASCO study of the 188 documented AT/RT cases prior to 2004 found 30% of the cases had metastasis at diagnosis.[1] Metastatic spread to the meninges (leptomenigeal spread sometimes referred to as sugar coating) is common both initially and with relapse. Average survival times decline with the presence of metastasis. Primary CNS tumors metastasize only within the CNS.
One case of metastatic disease to the abdomen via ventriculoperitoneal shunt has been reported with AT/RT . Metastatic dissemination via this mechanism has been reported with other brain tumors including germinomas, medulloblastomas, astrocytomas, glioblastomas, ependymomas and endodermal sinus tumors. Guler and Sugita separately reported cases of lung metastasis without a shunt.[35][36]
Epidemiology
An estimated 3% of pediatric brain tumors are AT/RTs although this percentage may increase with better differentiation between PNET/medulloblastoma tumors and AT/RTs.
As with other CNS tumors, slightly more males are affected than females (ratio 1.6:1). The ASCO study showed a 1.4:1 male to female ratio.[1]
History
Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor was first described as a distinct entity in 1987.[37] In some early subsequent reports the tumor was known also as malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) of the CNS. Between 1978 and 1987, AT/RT likely was misdiagnosed as rhabdoid tumor. Before 1978, when rhabdoid tumor was described, AT/RT likely was misdiagnosed as medulloblastoma. However, both AT/RT and non-CNS MRT have a worse prognosis than medulloblastoma and are resistant to the standard treatment protocols for medulloblastoma.
By 1995, AT/RT had become regarded as a newly-defined aggressive, biologically unique class of primarily brain and spinal tumors, usually affecting infants and young children.[38] In January 2001, the U.S. National Cancer Institute and Office of Rare Diseases hosted a Workshop on Childhood Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Twenty-two participants from 14 institutions came together to discuss the biology, treatments and new strategies for these tumors. The consensus paper on the biology of the tumor was published in Clinical Research.[39] The workshop's recognition that CNS atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) have deletions of the INI1 gene indicates that rhabdoid tumors of the kidney and brain are identical or closely related entities. This observation is not surprising because rhabdoid tumors at both locations possess similar histologic, clinical, and demographic features.
Research directions
Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor is rare and no therapy has been proven to deliver long-term survival, nor is there a set of standard protocols. Thus, most children with AT/RT are enrolled in clinical trials to attempt to find an effective cure. A clinical trial is not a treatment standard; it is research. Some clinical trials compare an experimental treatment to a standard treatment, but only if such a standard treatment exists.
- Pilot Study of Systemic and Intrathecal Chemotherapy followed by Conformal Radiation for Infants with Embryonal Intracranial Central Nervous System Tumors, A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Protocol. This study (PBTC-001) is run out of the nine institutions associated with the Pediatric Brain Tumor consortium and uses combined modalities including intrathecal mafosfamide, systemic chemotherapy (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatinum and oral etoposide) and possibly the use of craniospinal or conformal radiation.
- Head Start Chemotherapy Protocol. This chemotherapy protocol is for children <10 years old with newly diagnosed high grade primary brain tumors with intent to eliminate irradiation and shorten the treatment time to 6 months. The therapy consists of 3-5 cycles of intensive chemotherapy followed by a single myeloblative chemotherapy with stem cell rescue. Dr. Jonathan Finlay of New York University Medical Center is the contact person although run at a few hospitals in the county (contact information is listed on the site).
- Phase I Pilot Study of Intensive Chemotherapy with Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Rescue in Infants with Malignant Brain or Spinal Cord Tumors This study uses cisplatinum, cycophosphamide, vincristine and etoposide followed by carboplatinum and thiopeta and then stem cell rescue. There are to be three cycles of carboplatinum and thiopeta with stem cell rescue.
- Intrathecal and Systemic Chemotherapy Combined With Radiation Therapy in Treating Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Kieran MW (2006). "An Update on Germ Cell Tumors, Atypical Teratoid/Rhaboid Tumors, and Choroid Plexus Tumors Rare Tumors 3: Brain Tumors---Germ Cell Tumors, Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors, and Choroid Plexus Tumors". American Society of Clinical Oncology. Education Book. Retrieved 2007-05-20.
- ↑ Ho DM, Hsu CY, Wong TT, Ting LT, Chiang H (2000). "Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system: a comparative study with primitive neuroectodermal tumor/medulloblastoma". Acta Neuropathol. 99 (5): 482–8. PMID 10805090.
- ↑ CD99
- ↑ 2nd CD99 link
- ↑ Bruch LA, Hill DA, Cai DX, Levy BK, Dehner LP, Perry A (2001). "A role for fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of chromosome 22q dosage in distinguishing atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors from medulloblastoma/central primitive neuroectodermal tumors". Hum. Pathol. 32 (2): 156–62. doi:10.1053/hupa.2001.21572. PMID 11230702.
- ↑
Meyers SP, Khademianc ZP, Biegeld JA, Chuange SH, Koronesb DN, Zimmerman RA (2006). "Primary Intracranial Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors of Infancy and Childhood: MRI Features and Patient Outcomes". American Journal of Neuroradiology. 27 (5): 962–971. Retrieved 2008-05-05. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Lu L, Wilkinson EJ, Yachnis AT (2000). "CSF cytology of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the brain in a two-year-old girl: a case report". Diagn. Cytopathol. 23 (5): 329–32. PMID 11074628.
- ↑ Jay V, Edwards V, Halliday W, Rutka J, Lau R (1997). ""Polyphenotypic" tumors in the central nervous system: problems in nosology and classification". Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 17 (3): 369–89. PMID 9185218.
- ↑ Burger PC, Yu IT, Tihan T; et al. (1998). "Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system: a highly malignant tumor of infancy and childhood frequently mistaken for medulloblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study". Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 22 (9): 1083–92. PMID 9737241.
- ↑ [http://www.utmb.edu/otoref/Grnds/Mass-CPA-040602/Mass-CPA-slides-040602.pdf PDF
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Geyer JR, Sposto R, Jennings M; et al. (2005). "Multiagent chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in infants with malignant brain tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group". J. Clin. Oncol. 23 (30): 7621–31. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.09.095. PMID 16234523.
- ↑ "Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment". National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 2007-07-09.
- ↑ Poussaint TY, Phillips PC, Vajapeyam S; et al. (2007). "The Neuroimaging Center of the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium-collaborative neuroimaging in pediatric brain tumor research: a work in progress". AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 28 (4): 603–7. PMID 17416804.
- ↑ "Stem cell and bone marrow transplants". Cancerbackup. Retrieved 2007-07-09.
- ↑ "High-Dose Chemotherapy with Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue for Multiple Myeloma". NEJM. Retrieved 2007-07-09.
- ↑ Squire SE, Chan MD, Marcus KJ (2007). "Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor: the controversy behind radiation therapy". J. Neurooncol. 81 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1007/s11060-006-9196-z. PMID 16855864.
- ↑ Principles of Proton Beam Therapy
- ↑ Proton Beam RadioTheraphy at Mass. General
- ↑ Proton Beam Therapy Article
- ↑ Proton Beam Therapy - BJC Abstract
- ↑ Loma Linda Medical Center Proton Treatment Center - Overview
- ↑ Loma Linda overview of Childhood Brain Tumors
- ↑ Zhang ZK, Davies KP, Allen J; et al. (2002). "Cell cycle arrest and repression of cyclin D1 transcription by INI1/hSNF5". Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (16): 5975–88. PMID 12138206.
- ↑ "Atypical Teratoid / Rhabdoid Tumor (ATRT)". St Jude's Hospital. Retrieved 2007-07-10.
- ↑ Hilden JM, Meerbaum S, Burger P; et al. (2004). "Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor: results of therapy in children enrolled in a registry". J. Clin. Oncol. 22 (14): 2877–84. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.07.073. PMID 15254056. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
- ↑ Olson TA, Bayar E, Kosnic E (1995). "Successful treatment of disseminated central nervous system malignant rhabdoid tumors". J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 17: 71–75. PMID 7743242.
- ↑ Hirth A, Pedersen P-H, Wester K; et al. (2003). "Cerebral Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor of Infancy: Long-Term Survival after Multimodal Treatment, also Including Triple Intrathecal Chemotherapy and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery--Case Report (Abstract)". Pediatric Hematology and Oncology 2003. 20 (4): 327–332. doi:10.1080/713842315.
- ↑ Zimmerman MA, Goumnerova LC, Proctor M; et al. (2005). "Continuous remission of newly diagnosed and relapsed central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor". J. Neurooncol. 72 (1): 77–84. doi:10.1007/s11060-004-3115-y. PMID 15803379. Retrieved 2007-05-20.
- ↑ Gardner S, Diez B, Green A; et al. (June 13–16). "THER 27. INTENSIVE INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL RESCUE (ASCR) IN YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) ATYPICAL TERATOID RHABDOID TUMORS (ATT/RT)—THE "HEAD START" REGIMENS" (PDF). Abstracts from the Eleventh International Symposium on Pediatric Neuro-Oncology. Retrieved 2007-06-03. Check date values in:
|date=, |year= / |date= mismatch(help) - ↑ Fabre A, Eyden B, Ali HH (January 2004). "Soft-Tissue Extrarenal Rhabdoid Tumor with a Unique Long-Term Survival". Ultrastructural Pathology. 28 (1): 49–52. doi:10.1080/01913120490275259. Retrieved 2007-05-28.
- ↑
Fouladi M, Gilger E, Kocak M; et al. (October 1, 2005). "Intellectual and Functional Outcome of Children 3 Years Old or Younger Who Have CNS Malignancies". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 23 (28): 7152–60. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.01.214. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑
Monteleone P, Meadows AT (June 6, 2006). "Late Effects of Childhood Cancer and Treatment". eMedicine from WebMD. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Foreman NK, Faestel PM, Pearson J; et al. (January 1999). "Health Status in 52 Long-term Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors". Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 41 (1): 47–52. doi:10.1023/A:1006145724500.
- ↑ Meyers EA, Kieran MW (2002). "Brief Report Psychological adjustment of surgery-only pediatric neuro-oncology patients: a retrospective analysis". Psycho-Oncology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 11 (1): 74–79. doi:10.1002/pon.553.
- ↑ Güler E, Varan A, Söylemezoglu F; et al. (2001). "Extraneural metastasis in a child with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system" (PDF). J. Neurooncol. 54 (1): 53–6. PMID 11763423.
- ↑ Sugita Y, Takahashi Y, Hayashi I, Morimatsu M, Okamoto K, Shigemori M (1999). "Pineal malignant rhabdoid tumor with chondroid formation in an adult". Pathol. Int. 49 (12): 1114–8. PMID 10632935.
- ↑ Rorke LB, Packer RJ, Biegel JA (1996). "Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of infancy and childhood: definition of an entity". J. Neurosurg. 85 (1): 56–65. PMID 8683283.
- ↑ Rorke LB, Packer R, Biegel J (1995). "Central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors of infancy and childhood". J. Neurooncol. 24 (1): 21–8. PMID 8523069.
- ↑ Biegel JA, Kalpana G, Knudsen ES; et al. (2002). "The role of INI1 and the SWI/SNF complex in the development of rhabdoid tumors: meeting summary from the workshop on childhood atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors". Cancer Res. 62 (1): 323–8. PMID 11782395.
External links
- The Rhabdoid Registry
- Hilden JM, Meerbaum S, Burger P et al. (2004-07-15). "Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor: Results of Therapy in Children Enrolled in a Registry". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 22 (14): 2877–84. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.07.073. Retrieved 2007-05-23. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - Beigel J, Kalpana G, Knudsen E et al. (2002). "The role of INI and the SWI/SNF complex in the development of rhabdoid tumors: Meeting Summary from the workshop on childhood atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors". Cancer Research 2002 (63:): 323–28.
- Huret J, Sevenet N (2002). "Rhabdoid predisposition syndrome". Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology.
Template:Nervous tissue tumors
de:Atypischer teratoider/rhabdoider Tumor