Typhus laboratory findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Typhus}}
{{Typhus}}
 
{{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADG}}
{{CMG}}
==Overview==
 
Diagnosis of typhus fever is usually based on clinical recognition and serology; the latter requires comparison of acute- to convalescent-phase serology, so is only helpful in retrospect. Etiologic agents can generally only be identified to the genus level by serologic testing. PCR and immunohistochemical analyses may also be helpful.
==Laboratory Findings==
==Laboratory Findings==
===Electrolyte and Biomarker Studies===
===Electrolyte and Biomarker Studies===

Revision as of 15:11, 9 May 2017

Typhus Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Typhus from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Typhus laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Typhus laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Typhus laboratory findings

CDC on Typhus laboratory findings

Typhus laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Typhus laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Typhus

Risk calculators and risk factors for Typhus laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Diagnosis of typhus fever is usually based on clinical recognition and serology; the latter requires comparison of acute- to convalescent-phase serology, so is only helpful in retrospect. Etiologic agents can generally only be identified to the genus level by serologic testing. PCR and immunohistochemical analyses may also be helpful.

Laboratory Findings

Electrolyte and Biomarker Studies

A complete blood count (CBC) may show anemia and low platelets. Other blood tests for typhus may show:

References

Template:WH Template:WS