Neurofibroma CT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sara Mohsin (talk | contribs) |
Ahmed Younes (talk | contribs) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{CMG}}; {{AE}}{{S.M.}} {{SC}} | {{CMG}}; {{AE}}{{S.M.}} {{SC}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
[[CT scan]] may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma. | [[CT scan]] may be helpful in the [[diagnosis]] of [[neurofibroma]]. Findings on [[Computed tomography|CT scan]] suggestive of [[neurofibroma]] include a well-defined, round or [[oval]] [[hypodense]], [[fusiform]] [[mass]] representing the [[nerve]] entering and exiting the [[tumor]]. Low [[attenuation]] is attributed to high [[lipid]] or [[water]] content within the [[mucinous]] [[matrix]], entrapment of perineural [[adipose tissue]] and [[cystic]] [[degeneration]]. | ||
==CT Scan== | ==CT Scan== | ||
* [[CT scan]] may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma. | * [[CT scan]] may be helpful in the [[diagnosis]] of [[neurofibroma]]. | ||
* Findings on CT scan suggestive of neurofibroma include:<ref name="radio">Neurofibroma.Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Maxime St-Amant et al. Radiopaedia.org 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/neurofibroma Accessed on November 17, 2015 </ref> | * Findings on [[Computed tomography|CT scan]] suggestive of [[neurofibroma]] include:<ref name="radio">Neurofibroma.Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Maxime St-Amant et al. Radiopaedia.org 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/neurofibroma Accessed on November 17, 2015 </ref><ref>https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.24si035170#REF8</ref> | ||
** Well-defined, round or [[oval]] [[hypodense]] [[mass]] | |||
** Has an [[attenuation]] [[Value (mathematics)|value]] of 20–25 HU on nonenhanced [[Scan|scans]] and 30–50 HU after [[contrast]] [[Material properties (thermodynamics)|material]] administration | |||
** Best [[imaging]] [[Features (pattern recognition)|features]] for [[diagnosis]] is a [[fusiform]] [[mass]], which represents the [[nerve]] entering and exiting the [[tumor]] | |||
** Low [[attenuation]] is attributed to: | |||
***High [[lipid]] or [[water]] [[Content validity|content]] within the [[mucinous]] [[matrix]] | |||
***Entrapment of perineural [[adipose tissue]] | |||
***[[Cystic]] [[degeneration]] (less often) | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 16:01, 26 May 2019
Neurofibroma Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Neurofibroma CT On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Neurofibroma CT |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Mohsin, M.D.[2] Shanshan Cen, M.D. [3]
Overview
CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma. Findings on CT scan suggestive of neurofibroma include a well-defined, round or oval hypodense, fusiform mass representing the nerve entering and exiting the tumor. Low attenuation is attributed to high lipid or water content within the mucinous matrix, entrapment of perineural adipose tissue and cystic degeneration.
CT Scan
- CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of neurofibroma.
- Findings on CT scan suggestive of neurofibroma include:[1][2]
- Well-defined, round or oval hypodense mass
- Has an attenuation value of 20–25 HU on nonenhanced scans and 30–50 HU after contrast material administration
- Best imaging features for diagnosis is a fusiform mass, which represents the nerve entering and exiting the tumor
- Low attenuation is attributed to:
- High lipid or water content within the mucinous matrix
- Entrapment of perineural adipose tissue
- Cystic degeneration (less often)
References
- ↑ Neurofibroma.Dr Bruno Di Muzio and Dr Maxime St-Amant et al. Radiopaedia.org 2015. http://radiopaedia.org/articles/neurofibroma Accessed on November 17, 2015
- ↑ https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.24si035170#REF8