Tongue cancer MRI

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tongue cancer Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Tongue cancer from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Tongue cancer MRI On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Tongue cancer MRI

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Tongue cancer MRI

CDC on Tongue cancer MRI

Tongue cancer MRI in the news

Blogs on Tongue cancer MRI

Directions to Hospitals Treating Tongue cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Tongue cancer MRI

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]

Overview

Head and neck MRI scan is diagnostic of tongue cancer. On head and neck MRI, tongue cancer is characterized by isointense to hypointense mass on T1-weighted MRI and isotense to hyperintense mass on T2-weighted MRI.

MRI

  • MRI can provide more accurate definition of tumors of the tongue and is more sensitive for superficial tumors.[1]
  • MRI is also better than CT for discriminating tumor from mucus and in detecting bone marrow invasion.[2]
  • MRI can be useful for evaluation of cartilage invasion, particularly for non-ossified cartilage that can pose difficulty for CT.
  • CT scanning is better than MRI for detection of bone cortex invasion since MRI shows no bony detail.[3]
  • MRI is superior to CT for evaluation of perineural spread, skull base invasion, and intracranial extension of head and neck cancer.
  • MRI may also provide additional benefits compared with CT in the evaluation of the base of tongue and parotid glands. MRI scan is the imaging modality recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to evaluate skull base erosion.
  • noncontrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images with fat suppression, and fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences.
  • CT scanning outperforms MRI for the detection of pathologic nodal metastases.
  • MRI is excellent at identifying the extent of tumor infiltration and is especially useful in patients with significant dental amalgam which causes artifact on CT.[4]
MRI component Features
T1
  • Intermediate to low signal
T2
  • Intermediate to high signal
T1 contrast + gadolinium with fat saturation
  • Tumors enhance

In larger lesions that abut the mandible, MRI is more sensitive than CT at identifying early marrow change (low T1 signal, high T2 signal, enhancement) but less sensitive at visualising cortical erosion.

References

  1. Sakata K, Hareyama M, Tamakawa M, Oouchi A, Sido M, Nagakura H; et al. (1999). "Prognostic factors of nasopharynx tumors investigated by MR imaging and the value of MR imaging in the newly published TNM staging". Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 43 (2): 273–8. PMID 10030249.
  2. Rasch C, Keus R, Pameijer FA, Koops W, de Ru V, Muller S; et al. (1997). "The potential impact of CT-MRI matching on tumor volume delineation in advanced head and neck cancer". Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 39 (4): 841–8. PMID 9369132.
  3. Kuno H, Onaya H, Fujii S, Ojiri H, Otani K, Satake M (2014). "Primary staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: CT, MR imaging and dual-energy CT". Eur J Radiol. 83 (1): e23–35. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.022. PMID 24239239.
  4. Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Radiopedia(2015) http://radiopaedia.org/articles/squamous-cell-carcinoma-of-the-tongue Accessed on November 17, 2015
  5. 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 Image courtesy of Dr. Bruno Di Muzio Radiopaedia (original file [1]).[http://radiopaedia.org/licence Creative Commons BY-SA-NC

Template:WikiDoc Sources