Pericardial effusion surgery

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Xyz Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Xyz from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pericardial effusion surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pericardial effusion surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pericardial effusion surgery

CDC on Pericardial effusion surgery

Pericardial effusion surgery in the news

Blogs on Pericardial effusion surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pericardial effusion surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hafiz M. Ahmed, M.D.[2]

Overview

Surgical treatment of pericardial effusion is generally reserved for selected patients in whom percutaneous drainage is insufficient, recurrent effusion or recurrent tamponade occurs after prior pericardiocentesis, or more definitive drainage is required. Surgical options include creation of a pericardial window and, rarely, radical pericardiectomy in highly selected cases.

Indications

  • Surgical creation of a pericardial window may be considered in selected patients with recurrent large pericardial effusion and/or recurrent cardiac tamponade despite prior pericardiocentesis.
  • Radical pericardiectomy may rarely be considered for recurrent pericardial effusion despite creation of a pericardial window, particularly when medically refractory constrictive pericarditis or recurrent pericarditis is also present.[1]

Surgery

  • A pericardial window provides surgical drainage of recurrent or clinically significant pericardial effusion when repeat pericardiocentesis is not sufficient or is not the preferred strategy.
  • Radical pericardiectomy is not routine therapy for uncomplicated pericardial effusion and should be reserved for rare, selected patients, especially when recurrent effusion is accompanied by refractory constrictive pericarditis or recurrent pericarditis.[1]

Contraindications

  • The 2025 ACC expert consensus statement does not provide a specific list of absolute contraindications to surgical treatment of pericardial effusion. Decisions regarding surgical drainage should be individualized according to clinical status, recurrence pattern, procedural risk, and the presence of associated pericardial disease.[1]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Wang TKM, Klein AL, Cremer PC, Imazio M, Kohnstamm S, Luis SA, Mardigyan V, Mukherjee M, Ordovas K, Vakamudi S, Wohlford GF. 2025 Concise Clinical Guidance: An ACC Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericarditis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025;86(25):2691-2719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.023.

Template:WH Template:WS