Myasthenia gravis MRI

Jump to navigation Jump to search


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Keanu Ngo[2]

Myasthenia gravis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Myasthenia Gravis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Myasthenia gravis MRI On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Myasthenia gravis MRI

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Myasthenia gravis MRI

CDC on Myasthenia gravis MRI

Myasthenia gravis MRI in the news

Blogs on Myasthenia gravis MRI

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Myasthenia gravis MRI

Overview

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a problem-solving modality for the thymus in myasthenia gravis (MG), reserved for equivocal cross-sectional findings rather than routine screening.[1][2] Chest computed tomography (CT) is first-line, but chemical-shift and diffusion-weighted MRI are more accurate than CT for distinguishing thymoma from thymic lymphoid hyperplasia (TLH) and normal thymus, and avoid ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast.[3]

MRI

Indications and Clinical Role

MRI is not usually used for initial thymus assessment; CT is obtained first, and MRI is reserved for equivocal cases—chiefly a focal CT lesion that could be a small thymoma versus focal TLH, or when radiation/iodinated contrast should be avoided (young patients, pregnancy, contrast allergy).[1][4] For thymoma detection, CT and MRI perform similarly (sensitivity ~90%, specificity ~95%); MRI's advantage is lesion characterization.[1][4] In addition, MRI confirms cystic lesions and defines local invasion, preventing unnecessary thymectomy or biopsy.[2]

Quantitative MRI Techniques

  • Chemical-Shift MRI: Chemical-shift MRI is significantly more accurate than CT for distinguishing thymoma from nonthymomatous thymus.[3] The signal intensity index (SII) is the single most accurate parameter (opposed-phase signal drop from microscopic fat in hyperplastic/normal thymus; cutoff ~6–8%, AUROC up to 1.000, approaching 100% sensitivity and specificity in surgically confirmed MG cohorts), outperforming CT radiodensity (20 HU cutoff, AUROC 0.904) and qualitative CT reading (MRI accuracy 96.4% vs CT 86.7%).[3][5]
  • Diffusion-Weighted MRI (DWI): Diffusion-weighted apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) adds an independent discriminator (TLH/normal thymus shows higher ADC than thymoma; cutoff ~1.6 × 10⁻³ mm²/s).[5][6] Furthermore, lower ADC values predict higher-risk World Health Organization (WHO) histological subtypes and worse disease-free survival.[7][6]

On routine imaging, hyperplasia is identified in only ~18% of cases and cannot be reliably distinguished from a normal gland; at specialized centers MRI detects hyperplasia better than CT (sensitivity 68% vs 14%) but performance remains limited.[8][9]

Areas of Uncertainty

High-accuracy quantitative thresholds derive largely from single-center prospective cohorts awaiting multicenter validation, and ADC values vary with b-value protocol, limiting cross-site generalizability. The chemical-shift ratio (CSR) overlaps in early adulthood because the fat-poor young thymus suppresses incompletely; SII is preferred and age must be factored into interpretation.[10] No dedicated MG society guideline mandates MRI—its role is defined by radiology cohort studies and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.[2][8]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Punga AR, Maddison P, Heckmann JM, Guptill JT, Evoli A (2022). "Epidemiology, diagnostics, and biomarkers of autoimmune neuromuscular junction disorders". Lancet Neurol. 21 (2): 176–188. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00297-0. PMID 34958509 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Expert Panel on Thoracic I, Ackman JB, Chung JH, et al. (2021). "ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Mediastinal Masses". J Am Coll Radiol. 18 (5S): S37–S51. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2021.01.007. PMID 33858683 Check |pmid= value (help). Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Priola AM, Priola SM, Gned D, Giraudo MT, Fornari A, Veltri A (2016). "Comparison of CT and chemical-shift MRI for differentiating thymoma from non-thymomatous conditions in myasthenia gravis". Clin Radiol. 71 (3): e157–e169. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2015.12.008. PMID 26774127.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Priola AM, Priola SM (2014). "Imaging of thymus in myasthenia gravis: from thymic hyperplasia to thymic tumor". Clin Radiol. 69 (5): e230–e245. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.005. PMID 24581970.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Priola AM, Priola SM, Giraudo MT, et al. (2015). "Chemical-shift and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of thymus in myasthenia gravis: usefulness of quantitative assessment". Invest Radiol. 50 (4): 228–238. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000119. PMID 25478741.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Priola AM, Priola SM, Giraudo MT, et al. (2016). "Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of thymoma: ability of the apparent diffusion coefficient in predicting the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the Masaoka-Koga staging system and its prognostic significance on disease-free survival". Eur Radiol. 26 (7): 2126–2138. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4031-6. PMID 26427698.
  7. Abdel Razek AA, Khairy M, Nada N (2014). "Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in thymic epithelial tumors: correlation with World Health Organization classification and clinical staging". Radiology. 273 (1): 268–275. doi:10.1148/radiol.14131643. PMID 24877982.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Klimiec E, Quirke M, Leite MI, Hilton-Jones D (2018). "Thymus imaging in myasthenia gravis: The relevance in clinical practice". Muscle Nerve. 58 (4): 707–713. doi:10.1002/mus.26075. PMID 29890786.
  9. Luo H, Xie S, Ma C, et al. (2018). "Correlation between thymus radiology and myasthenia gravis in clinical practice". Front Neurol. 9: 1173. doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01173. PMID 30697185.
  10. Priola AM, Priola SM, Ciccone G, et al. (2015). "Differentiation of rebound and lymphoid thymic hyperplasia from anterior mediastinal tumors with dual-echo chemical-shift MR imaging in adulthood: reliability of the chemical-shift ratio and signal intensity index". Radiology. 274 (1): 238–249. doi:10.1148/radiol.14132665. PMID 25105246.