Definition of volume susceptibility
- See also Relative permeability.
The volume magnetic susceptibility, represented by the symbol (often simply , sometimes — magnetic, to distinguish from the electric susceptibility), is defined by the relationship
where, in SI units,
- M is the magnetization of the material (the magnetic dipole moment per unit volume), measured in amperes per meter, and
- H is the magnetic field strength, also measured in amperes per meter.
The magnetic induction B is related to H by the relationship
where μ0 is the magnetic constant (see table of physical constants), and is the relative permeability of the material. The magnetic susceptibility χv and the magnetic permeability μ are related by the following formula:
This allows an alternative description of all magnetization phenomena in terms of the quantities I and B, as opposed to the commonly used M and H.
Note that these definitions are according to SI conventions. However, many tables of magnetic susceptibility give cgs values that rely on a different definition of the permeability of free space. The cgs value of volume susceptibility is multiplied by 4π to give the SI volume susceptibility value:
Mass susceptibility and molar susceptibility
There are two other measures of susceptibility, the mass magnetic susceptibility (χmass or χg, sometimes χm), measured in m3·kg-1 in SI or in cm3·g-1 in cgs and the molar magnetic susceptibility (χmol) measired in m3·mol-1 (SI) or cm3·mol-1 (cgs) that are defined below, where ρ is the density in kg·m-3 (SI) or g·cm-3 (cgs) and M is molar mass in kg·mol-1 (SI) or g·mol-1 (cgs).
Sign of susceptibility: diamagnetics and paramagnetics
If χ is positive, then (1+χv) > 1 (or, in cgs units, (1+4πχv) > 1) and the material is called paramagnetic. In this case, the magnetic field is strengthened by the presence of the material. Alternatively, if χ is negative, then (1+χv) < 1 (or, in cgs units, (1+4πχv) < 1), and the material is diamagnetic. As a result, the magnetic field is weakened in the presence of the material.
Experimental methods to determine susceptibility
Volume magnetic susceptibility is measured by the force change felt upon the application of a magnetic field gradient . Early measurements were made using the Gouy balance where a sample is hung between the poles of an electromagnet. The change in weight when the electromagnet is turned on is proportional to the susceptibility. Today, high-end measurement systems use a superconductive magnet. An alternative is to measure the force change on a strong compact magnet upon insertion of the sample. This system, widely used today, is called the Evan's balance. For liquid samples, the susceptibility can be measured from the dependence of the NMR frequency of the sample on its shape or orientation.
The magnetic susceptibility of most crystals is not a scalar. Magnetic response M is dependent upon the orientation of the sample and can occur in directions other than that of the applied field H. In these cases, volume susceptibility is defined as a tensor
where i and j refer to the directions (e.g., x, y and z in Cartesian coordinates) of the applied field and magnetization, respectively. The tensor is thus rank 2, dimension (3,3) describing the component of magnetization in the i-th direction from the external field applied in the j-th direction.
In ferromagnetic crystals, the relationship between M and H is not linear. To accommodate this, a more general definition of differential susceptibility is used
where is a tensor derived from partial derivatives of components of M with respect to components of H. When the coercivity of the material parallel to an applied field is the smaller of the two, the differential susceptibility is a function of the applied field and self interactions, such as the magnetic anisotropy. When the material is not saturated, the effect will be nonlinear and dependent upon the domain wall configuration of the material.
Susceptibility in the frequency domain
When the magnetic susceptibility is studied as a function of frequency, the permeability is a complex quantity and resonances can be seen. In particular, when an ac-field is applied perpendicular to the detection direction (called the "transverse susceptibility" regardless of the frequency), the effect has a peak at the ferromagnetic resonance frequency of the material with a given static applied field. Currently, this effect is called the microwave permeability or network ferromagnetic resonance in the literature. These results are sensitive to the domain wall configuration of the material and eddy currents.
|Material||Temperature||(molar susc.)||(mass susc.)||(volume susc.)||M (molar mass)||(density)|
|Units||(oC)||(SI)||(cgs)||(SI)||(cgs)||(SI)||(cgs)||(10-3 kg/mol) or (g/mol)||(103 kg/m3) or (g/cm3)|
Sources of confusion in published data
There are tables of magnetic susceptibility values published on-line that seem to have been uploaded from a substandard source, which itself has probably borrowed heavily from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Some of the data (e.g. for Al, Bi, and diamond) are apparently in cgs Molar Susceptibility units, whereas that for water is in Mass Susceptibility units (see discussion above). The susceptibility table in the CRC Handbook is known to suffer from similar errors, and even to contain sign errors. Effort should be made to trace the data in such tables to the original sources, and to double-check the proper usage of units. Use them at your own risk!
- Maxwell's equations
- Magnetic flux density
- Electric susceptibility
- Curie constant
- Permeability (electromagnetism)
- magnetic constant
- Magnetic properties of materials
- L N Mulay (1972). A Weissberger and B W Rossiter, ed. Techniques of Chemistry. 4. Wiley-Interscience: New York. pp. p.431.
- Magway Magnetic Susceptibility Balances
- J R Zimmerman, and M R Foster (1957). "Standardization of NMR high resolution spectra". J. Phys. Chem. 61: 282–289. doi:10.1021/j150549a006.
- Robert Engel, Donald Halpern, and Susan Bienenfeld (1973). "Determination of magnetic moments in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry". Anal. Chem. 45: 367–369. doi:10.1021/ac60324a054.
- P W Kuchel, B E Chapman, W A Bubb, P E Hansen, C J Durrant, and M P Hertzberg (2003). "Magnetic susceptibility: solutions, emulsions, and cells". Concepts Magn. Reson. A 18: 56–71. doi:10.1002/cmr.a.10066.
- K Frei and H J Bernstein (1962). "Method for determining magnetic susceptibilities by NMR". J. Chem. Phys. 37: 1891–1892. doi:10.1063/1.1733393.
- R E Hoffman (2003). "Variations on the chemical shift of TMS". J. Magn. Reson. 163: 325–331. doi:10.1016/S1090-7807(03)00142-3.
- G P Arrighini, M Maestro, and R Moccia (1968). "Magnetic Properties of Polyatomic Molecules: Magnetic Susceptibility of H2O, NH3, CH4, H2O2". J. Chem. Phys. 49: 882–889. doi:10.1063/1.1670155.
- S Otake, M Momiuchi and N Matsuno (1980). "Temperature Dependence of the Magnetic Susceptibility of Bismuth". J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 49 (5): 1824–1828. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.49.1824. The tensor needs to be averaged over all orientations: .
- J Heremans, C H Olk and D T Morelli (1994). "Magnetic Susceptibility of Carbon Structures". Phys. Rev. B. 49 (21): 15122–15125. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.49.15122.
- R E Glick (1961). "On the Diamagnetic Susceptibility of Gases". J. Phys. Chem. 65 (9): 1552–1555. doi:10.1021/j100905a020.
- C L Foiles (1976). "Comments on Magnetic Susceptibility of Silver". Phys. Rev. B. 13 (12): 5606–5609. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5606.
- Magnetic Properties Susceptibilities Chart from READE
ca:Susceptibilitat magnètica cs:Magnetická susceptibilita de:Magnetische Suszeptibilität it:Suscettività magnetica nl:Magnetische susceptibiliteit sk:Magnetická susceptibilita uk:Магнітна сприйнятливість