Flame retardant

Jump to: navigation, search
File:FlameRetardantSocks.jpg
Socks made from flame retardant cotton.

Flame retardants are materials that inhibit or resist the spread of fire. These can be separated into several categories:

Many of these chemicals are considered harmful, having been linked to liver, thyroid, reproductive/developmental, and neurological effects.[1] PCBs were banned in 1977[2] and the EU has banned several types of brominated flame retardants as of 2008,[3] following evidence beginning in 1998 that the chemicals were accumulating in human breast milk.[4] Currently some US states and various countries are investigating PBDEs as well; of the major ones only decaBDE remains on the North American market.[3]

Aside from various conventional alternatives such as antinomony or phosphorus-based retardants which have toxicological problems of their own, Environmental Health Perspectives surveys the halogen-free alternatives being explored.[3] These include a technique to fuse flame retardants into products (so no chemicals leak), nanoclays incorporating montmorillonite, an entirely new plastic which produces water when burned called bishydroxydeoxybenzoin (BHDB),[5] and possibly other nanomaterial solutions. Inherently flame-resistant products are ideal, and the aerospace industry uses such plastics, but they are too costly for widespread use.

Mechanisms of function

Endothermic degradation

Some compounds break down endothermically when subjected to high temperatures. Magnesium and aluminium hydroxides are an example, together with various hydrates. The reaction removes heat from the surrounding, thus cooling the material. The use of hydroxides and hydrates is limited by their relatively low decomposition temperature, which limits the maximum processing temperature of the polymers.

Dilution of fuel

Inert fillers, eg. talc or calcium carbonate, act as diluents, lowering the combustible portion of the material, thus lowering the amount of heat per volume of material it can produce while burning.

Thermal shielding

A way to stop spreading of the flame over the material is to create a thermal insulation barrier between the burning and unburned parts. Intumescent additives are often employed; their role is to turn the polymer into a carbonized foam, which separates the flame from the material and slows the heat transfer to the unburned fuel.

Dilution of gas phase

Inert gases (most often carbon dioxide and water) produced by thermal degradation of some materials act as diluents of the combustible gases, lowering their partial pressures and the partial pressure of oxygen, and slowing the reaction rate.

Gas phase radical quenching

Chlorinated and brominated materials undergo thermal degradation and release hydrogen chloride and hydrogen bromide. These react with the highly reactive H· and OH· radicals in the flame, resulting in an inactive molecule and a Cl· or Br· radical. The halogen radical has much lower energy than H· or OH·, and therefore has much lower potential to propagate the radical oxidation reactions of combustion. Antimony compounds tend to act in synergy with halogenated flame retardants. The HCl and HBr released during burning are highly corrosive, which has reliability implications for objects (especially fine electronics) subjected to the released smoke.

Health concerns

Flame retardants have faced renewed attention in recent years. The earliest flame retardants, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were banned in the 1977 when it was discovered that they were toxic.[2] Industries shifted to using brominated flame retardants instead, but these are now receiving closer scrutinty. The EU has banned several types of polybrominated diphenyl etherss (PDBEs) as of 2008, 10 years after Sweden discovered that they were accumulating in breast milk.[3] Nearly all Americans tested have trace levels of flame retardants in their body. Recent research links some of this exposure to dust on television sets, which may have been generated from the TV heating up the flame retardants in the TV. Careless disposal of TVs and other appliances such as microwaves or old computers may greatly increase the amount of environmental contamination.[6]

Sudden infant death syndrome

UK scientist Barry Richardson claimed in 1989 that a fungus in bedding broke down the antimony, phosphorus, and arsenic flame retardants in infant bedding to form toxic gases. This research was taken up by New Zealand scientist Jim Sprott, who published a book on it, and eventually aired on The Cook Report in 1994. A 1998 UK government-sponsored study called the Limerick Report found that toxic gases were not created.[7] Sprott maintains that his findings were not refuted.[8]

See also

References

  1. Illinois EPA Report on Flame Retardant
  2. 2.0 2.1 ATSDR. (2001). ToxFAQ PCBs.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 New Thinking on Flame Retardants, Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(5), May 2008
  4. Y. Lind, P. O. Darnerud, S. Atuma, M. Aune, W. Becker, R. Bjerselius, S. Cnattingius and A. Glynn (2003). "Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in breast milk from Uppsala County, Sweden." Environmental Research 93(2): 186–194. PMID 12963403
  5. [UMass Scientists Create New Plastic]
  6. Seattle-Times. (2008) Harmful chemical wafts from your TV. Retrieved Sunday, May 11, 2008.
  7. BBC. (1998). Mattresses 'not responsible' for cot deaths
  8. Critique of the UK Limerick Report

External links

de:Flammschutzmittel nl:Vlamvertrager fi:Palonsuoja-aine sv:Flamskyddsmedel



Linked-in.jpg