WikiDoc Resources for Decompression sickness
Evidence Based Medicine
Guidelines / Policies / Govt
Patient Resources / Community
Healthcare Provider Resources
Continuing Medical Education (CME)
Experimental / Informatics
Synonyms and keywords: Decompression illness; DCS; the diver's disease; the bends; Caisson disease; aerobullosis
Decompression sickness (DCS) is a multi-organ condition characterized by a varied clinical manifestations resulting from an exposure to reduced barometric pressures that leads to a normally dissolved inert gases (mainly nitrogen) in body fluids and tissues to come out of physical solution, and develops a free gas phase by forming an intravascular and extravascular bubbles. The likelihood of DCS is associated with the extent of bubble formation which subsequently causes minor symptoms from a few bubbles formation to a large bubble presenting with the multiorgan failure and death. The severity and nature of the DCS injury vary from mild systemic, musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations to severe, life-threatening neurological and cardiorespiratory complications. It is mostly observed in underwater decompression diving activities (e.g SCUBA) and depressurisation events such as emerging from a caisson, flying in an unpressurised aircraft at altitude, and extravehicular activity from spacecraft. The clinical presentation can show an individual susceptibility by varying from day to day under the similar circumstances. The classification of types of DCS based on its symptoms has evolved over years since its origin and research conducted to prevent it. It is not common to report it if the divers follow the recommended guidelines by using dive tables or dive computers to limit their period of exposure and control their rate of ascent speed. If DCS is suspected, it is treated by airway stabilization, high flow oxygen, and hyperbaric therapy in a recompression chamber. An early treatment ensures a significantly higher recovery rate.
- 1670: Sir Robert Boyle described the first case of DCS in animals by conducting an experiment on a viper in a vacuum and observing the bubble formation in its eye with significant physical symptoms of discomfort. 
- 1841: Jacques Triger proposed that the two miners while working in the pressurised caisson work developed the symptoms of DCS and thus, documented the first case of DCS in humans. 
- 1847: The French physicians B. Pol and T.J. Watelle explained the effectiveness of recompression in caisson workers for the use of the treatment of DCS.  
- 1857: Felix Hoppe-Seyler supported Boyle's study findings. He further observed that the bubble formation is the underlying cause of sudden death in compressed air workers and recommended recompression therapy as the mode of treatment. 
- 1861: Bucquoy proposed the hypothesis by comparing an injection of air in the veins with the blood gases returning to the free state under the process of decompression. 
- 1868: Alfred Le Roy de Méricourt labelled DCS as an occupational hazard for the sponge divers. 
- 1873: Dr. Andrew Smith studied 110 DCS cases during the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge and coined the terms "caisson disease" and "compressed air illness". Similarly, the term "the bends" was extracted from the fashionable ladies of the period "the Grecian Bend" as the workers emerging from pressurized construction on the Brooklyn Bridge adopted a posture similar to them.  
- 1878: Paul Bert found that the nitrogen gas bubbles released from tissues and blood during or after decompression are responsible for the development of the DCS and further showed that breathing oxygen after developing DCS can help in relieving its symptoms. 
- 1889–90: Ernest William Moir made the first medical airlock when he realized that recompression is the main modality of the treatment to prevent the workforce digging the Hudson River Tunnel dying from DCS.  
- 1908:John Scott Haldane prepared the first recognized decompression table for the British Admiralty which was based on experiments performed on goats using an end point of symptomatic DCS.  
- 1912: Chief Gunner George D. Stillson of the United States Navy created a program to evaluate and refine Haldane's tables which subsequently led to the first publication of the United States Navy Diving Manual and the establishment of a Navy Diving School in Newport, Rhode Island. 
- In 1960, The Golding Classification was introduced and categorized DCS into type 1 DCS and type 2 DCS. 
Table 1 shows the Golding classification of DCS:
|FEATURES||TYPE 1||TYPE 2|
|Systems involved||Joints, skin, and lymphatics||Neurological, inner ear, and cardiopulmonary|
|Onset of symptoms||Build in intensity||Gradual or abrupt|
- This classification is not frequently used in making the diagnosis of DCS following upgradation of the treatment protocols and variable presentations of signs and symptoms. 
- All the manifestations, whether DCS or arterial gas embolism (AGE), were categorized under the general term “decompression illness (DCI)” when the exact diagnosis cannot be finalized because both of them develops from the gas bubble formation in the body, have overlapping of their spectra of signs and symptoms, and similar treatment methods. 
- The pathophysiology of DCS is in accordance with Henry’s law. It states that the solubility of a gas in a liquid is directly proportional to the amount of the pressure exerted on the gas and liquid. Thus, the amount of inert gases (eg, nitrogen, helium) dissolved in the blood and tissues increases at higher pressure, and hence the development of DCS depends on the depth and the duration of the dive.
- During a dive, the partial pressure of nitrogen and oxygen increases which results in creating a diffusion gradient favoring an uptake of nitrogen into the bloodstream and tissues. The physiology of the lungs is to functions as a vehicle for the gaseous exchange and elimination from the body under normal circumstances. As the atmospheric pressure decrease during the ascent, more nitrogen precipitates from the tissues into the bloodstream and then diffuses back into the alveoli for exhalation process. If ascent occurs too rapidly or the elimination gradient is so steep, the gas quickly dissipates from the tissues and blood forming small air bubbles. This process is called “out gassing” or “off gassing”. Conversely, a slow ascent favors an equilibrium to be achieved gradually, and prevents the rapid changes in the partial pressure of nitrogen in the bloodstream. Hence, the amount of bubble formation depends on the depth and duration of the dive, and the rate of the ascent. 
- Venous bubbles may form de novo or result from the intravascular release of tissue bubbles. The venous gas emboli usually get filtered at an arteriole level on reaching the lungs. However, the bubbles may pass directly into the arterial circulation if the pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) rises after underwater diving.  
- Bubbles primarily travel to vital organs such as the nervous system; and get lodged in arterioles and capillary beds causing a mass effect. These bubbles obstruct venous outflow and occlude arteries, as well as cause a shearing force on endovascular surfaces and impairs vascular integrity during their transit. The disturbed vascular permeability consequently leads to hemoconcentration, disturbance of microvascular flow, and a breakdown in the blood brain barrier. 
- Bubbles cause secondary multiple biochemical effects by activating platelets, complement, leucocytes and the clotting cascade; and hence, results in an inflammatory response in the affected tissues. 
- Autochthonous or extravascular bubbles arise spontaneously, and are more likely to form in tissues with high gas content and poor perfusion because the large amount of gas in the tissues such as spinal cord white matter, adipose tissue, and periarticular tissue cannot be removed by the low perfusing blood volume. 
- Bubbles are responsible for the proximate cause of damage, whereas the several pro-inflammatory activated pathways leads to the progression of an injury. Thus, DCS can have an evolving course with inflammatory mediated manifestations worsening with a period of time.
- Clinical presentation: It is frequently idiosyncratic as its "typical" pattern gives an atypical presentation due to the origin of the bubble formation in any part of the body. The US Navy listed the symptoms of DCS in a decreasing order of their overall prevalence in Table 2: 
|Symptoms||Features in %|
|Local joint pain||89|
|Shortness of breath||1.6|
- Onset: The median time to symptom/sign onset is 30 minutes and severe neurologic symptoms might present as early as within 10 minutes; and however, majority of symptoms and signs develops within 24 to 48 hours of emerging from the water. The U.S. Navy and Technical Diving International have published a table that documents time to onset of first presenting symptom. The table does not differentiate between types of DCS, or types of symptom.  
Table 3 shows the time of onset of symptoms among DCS suspected cases:
|Time to onset||Percentage of cases|
|Within 1 hour||42%|
|Within 3 hour||60%|
|Within 8 hour||83%|
|Within 24 hour||98%|
|Within 48 hour||100%|
- Joints DCS is most frequently noticed in shoulders, elbows, knees, and ankles. Shoulder is the most common site for altitude and bounce diving; and the knees and hip joints for saturation and compressed air work. The symptoms of limb bends arises from increased intermedullary pressure in the ends of long bones; and gas phase separation along ligaments and tendon sheaths, and thus presenting with an extreme discomfort from the simple mechanical distension and movement.
- Dermatological manifestations are due to the blood extravasated from the cutaneous vessels as a consequence of bubble induced endothelial injury.
- Pulmonary DCS ("the chokes") is rarely reported in divers; and believed to arise from an extremely huge load of venous bubbles in the pulmonary artery which results in an elevated pulmonary artery and right ventricular pressures, and further increasing the interstitial fluid and hence, leads to the development of the chokes or difficult breathing.
- Spinal cord DCS have two interrelated mechanisms. The first is obstruction of venous outflow of the spinal cord in the epidural plexus which relatively have a slow blood perfusion rate. Once this process develops, it results in an ongoing and progressive diminution of blood flow to the cord, and thereafter, the second process proceeds with the in-situ bubble formation within the tissue of the spinal cord.  
Table 4 shows symptoms and signs of different DCS types: 
|DCS type||Bubble location||Signs and symptoms|
|Musculoskeletal: BENDS||Mostly large joints (elbows, shoulders, hip, wrists, knees, ankles)||
|Cutaneous: SKIN BENDS||Skin||
|Dysbaric osteonecrosis ||Bones||
- Differential diagnosis is the process by which medical personnel rule out which of the potential condition is most likely responsible for the presenting symptoms when two or more probable conditions have overlapping symptoms among the diving-related injuries.
- An alternative diagnosis should also be suspected if severe symptoms begin more than six hours following decompression without an altitude exposure or if any symptom occurs more than 24 hours after surfacing. 
Table 5 below shows various different medical conditions mimicking the DCS: 
|Medical condition||Clinical characteristics|
|Arterial Gas Embolism (AGE) ||
|Middle-ear or maxillary sinus overinflation|
|Contaminated diving gas and oxygen toxic effects||
|Musculoskeletal strains or trauma sustained ||
|Seafood toxin ingestion||
|Immersion pulmonary edema||
|Coincidental, unrelated acute neurological disorder||
Epidemiology and Demographics
- The incidence of DCS, fortunately, is rare.
- Recreational divers: It is estimated in about 2 to 4/10,000 dives.
- Commercial divers: It can be higher ranging from 1.5-10 per 10,000 dives due to prior history of minor musculoskeletal injuries.
- Its prevalence depends on the length and depth of the dive.
- The risk for DCS is 2.5 times greater for males in relation to females. 
- Various environmental, diving and individual factors are related to the predisposition of DCS.
- In 2005, DeNoble et al conducted a study to find the association of various risk factors with the DCS
- Multiple risk factors studied: age, gender, body mass index, smoking, asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, previous history of DCI, number of the years since certification, number of dives in the last year, number of diving days, number of dives in a repetitive series, last dive depth, nitrox use, and drysuit use.
- No significant correlation with DCS: asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, smoking, or body mass index.
- Positive correlation (higher risk): increased diving depth, previous DCS episodes, multiple consecutive days of diving and being male.
- Negative correlation (lower risk): nitrox and drysuit use, higher frequency of diving in the past year, increasing age, and years since certification possibly as indicators of more extensive training and experience.
- Magnitude of the pressure reduction ratio: DCS is more likely to be experienced with a larger pressure reduction ratio in comparison to a smaller reduction. 
- Temperature: Warm conditions may favor nitrogen uptake which results in an increased level of dissolved nitrogen and hence, putting a diver at higher risk of “out gassing” during ascent phase. Contrarily, the cold conditions slows the process; however, no definitive studies have demonstrated a direct relationship between thermal conditions and development of DCS. 
- Repetitive exposures: A shorter periods of break among similar repetitive dives and ascents to altitudes above 5,500 metres (18,000 ft) will raise the risk of DCS because excessive nitrogen remains dissolved in body tissues for at least 12 hours after each dive, and hence, repeated dives within 1 day predisposes the divers to it.
- Post dive air travel: Divers who ascend to altitude soon after a dive increase their possibility of developing DCS even if the dive was performed within the dive table safe limits. 
- Diving before travelling to altitude: DCS can occur even without flying if a diver moves to a high-altitude location on land immediately after diving; for example, scuba divers in Eritrea who drive from the coast to the Asmara plateau at 2,400 m (7,900 ft) increase their chances of DCS. 
- Ambient temperature: A very cold ambient temperatures may increase the risk of altitude DCS. However, increasing ambient temperature during decompression following the dives in cold water may reduce the risk levels.  
- Rate of ascent: A rate of ascent shows a positive correlation with faster the ascent, greater the risk. The U.S. Navy Diving Manual indicates that ascent rates greater than about 20 m/min (66 ft/min) from the diving depth increases the possibility of DCS, while other recreational dive tables such as the Bühlmann tables require an ascent rate of 10 m/min (33 ft/min) with the last 6 m (20 ft) taking at least one minute to lower its incidence. A diver exposed to a rapid decompression rate of ascent of above 5,500 metres (18,000 ft) has a greater risk of altitude DCS in comparison to being exposed to the same altitude but at a lower rate of ascent.  
- Duration of diving: A longer duration of the dive, the greater risk of DCS. Similarly, a longer flights, especially to altitudes of 5,500 m (18,000 ft) and above, holds a higher risk of altitude DCS. 
- Diving at altitude: Diving in water whose surface altitude is above 300 m (980 ft) have a higher risk of developing DCS; for example, Lake Titicaca is at 3,800 m (12,500 ft) and diving in it without using versions of decompression tables or dive computers that are modified for high-altitude predisposes the divers to DCS. 
- Dehydration: Drinking isotonic saline or adequate hydration will raise the serum surface tension which is helpful in controlling bubble size and hence, reduces the chances of DCS in aviators. Therefore, maintaining adequate hydration is recommended.  
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO): At birth, a hole between the atrial chambers of the heart in the fetus gets normally closed by a flap with the first breath. However, in about 20% of adults, where the flap does not seal completely, allows blood through the hole during coughing or activities that raise chest pressure. During diving, PFO can allow venous blood with microbubbles of inert gas to bypass the lungs, where the bubbles would otherwise be filtered out by the lung capillary system, and return directly to the arterial system (including arteries to the brain, spinal cord and heart). In the arterial system, bubbles are highly dangerous because they block circulation and cause infarction. In the brain, infarction results in stroke; whereas in the spinal cord, it may predispose to paralysis.  
- Age: An increasing age (especially >42 years of age) has been associated with a higher incidence of altitude DCS. 
- Previous injury: Divers with a previous history of recent joint or limb injuries may have a higher susceptibility to development of the decompression-related bubbles. 
- Body type: A diver with a high body fat content stores about the half the total amount of the nitrogen which predisposes them to a higher chances of DCS. This is due to five times greater solubility of nitrogen in fat than water, and hence, resulting in a higher levels of total body dissolved nitrogen during elevated atmospheric pressure.  
- Alcohol consumption: It increases chances of dehydration and inhibits pituitary release of antidiuretic hormone (ADH); and therefore may increase susceptibility to DCS.  Contrarily, another study found no correlation between alcohol consumption and developing DCS. 
- Work and exercise: DCS is strongly related with the level of work or exercise done at depth or shortly after diving because it promotes increased inert gas uptake. Therefore, any kind of strenuous exercise will promote bubble formation, and lighter exercise during ascent or stop phase will favor gas excretion. 
- Asthma: Asthmatics are generally advised not to dive due to a theoretical risk of bronchospasm triggered by cold or changing environments, inability to have an immediate response to an asthma attack while being submerged, and supposed increased barotrauma during ascent. However, more studies are warranted as there is limited data to support preventing them from diving. Well-controlled asthmatics with normal PFTs can occasionally be permitted to dive, however, an assessment should be made on a case-by-case basis. 
- DCS is primarily a clinical diagnosis assessed with a thorough and detailed dive history from a conscious patient and the clinical examination, including the neurological exam.
- The specific symptoms/signs and their particular time of onset (table 3 and 4) aid in suspecting and establishing the diagnosis.
- However, the relief of symptoms by recompression will make the definitive confirmation of the probable diagnosis.
- Hence, an immediate treatment should be begun with no delay for further diagnostic work up.
In 2004 Freiberger identified important five diagnostic factors in their order of importance using simulated diving injury cases:
- (1) A neurologic symptom as the primary presenting symptom,
- (2) onset time to symptoms,
- (3) joint pain as a presenting symptom,
- (4) any relief after recompression treatment, and
- (5) maximum depth of the last dive
- DCS is associated with hemoconcentration, and elevated serum CK is seen in severe AGE.
- However, none of the laboratory studies make a definitive diagnosis of DCS. 
- No imaging study can confirm the diagnosis of DCS.
- Bubble formation can occasionally be identified on MRI or CT scans; however, they are not considered the reliable method to rule out DCS due to their low sensitivity level in making the diagnosis.
- Although, they might be used to rule out the other differential disorders that presents with the similar signs and symptoms (eg, herniated intervertebral disk, ischemic stroke, central nervous system hemorrhage).
- These studies should be performed with no delay as prompt intervention is important in the successful management of the DCS.
Chest and Joints Radiography
- Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pulmonary overexpansion injury, or pulmonary edema should always be ruled out with chest radiographs.
- Radiographs rarely detect bubble formation in joints affected by pain.
- Skeletal x-rays are not considered diagnostic for dysbaric osteonecrosis which may show joint degeneration; and hence cannot be used to differentiate between different joint disorders.  
Computed Tomography Scan
- Head CT: A “normal” head CT is not reliable in excluding DCS due to the very low chances of visibility of vascular gas bubbles on CT films in the cases of suspected DCS. However, it should be strongly considered in any patient who presented with an altered mental status in order to evaluate alternative diagnoses, such as subdural or epidural hematoma.  
- Chest CT: An extrapulmonary air can be detected on it, but it should be avoided due to its high radiation exposure level. 
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- MRI can be falsely reassuring for detecting the spinal cord or brain abnormalities related to DCS.
- However, it can diagnose ischemic lesions of the brain or spinal cord due to the etiologies other than DCS. 
Other diagnostic studies
- Doppler ultrasonography and Echocardiography: They are not considered the diagnostic tests for DCS; but done to rule out right to left shunt and for research purposes into venous gas emboli. 
- Neurophysiological tests (eg, audiometry and electronystagmography for inner-ear decompression sickness): They can usually be delayed until after recompression. 
- Non invasive pulmonary diagnostic test: None of them are used in making or excluding the diagnosis. 
- Pulmonary diagnostic procedures (e.g.: Bronchoscopy): None is required in making or excluding the diagnosis. 
- Pathology/Cytology/Genetics Study: None is considered in making or excluding the diagnosis. 
Although laboratory and radiological analyses are helpful for detection of DCS related abnormalities in some cases; however, these studies are not considered as the deciding factor for the start of the recompression therapy, and hence, recompression should be given with no delay unless there is a strong suspicion of other non-diving related etiologies (eg, cerebral hemorrhage). 
The several elements to the effective management of DCS consist of initial treatment including on-the-scene evaluation and first aid; transportation; and definitive medical treatment.
On the scene first aid
- The foundation of first aid is the basic life support.
- An initial management should focus on the treatment and stabilization of ABC's (airway, breathing, and circulation) in the patients with an altered mental status or loss of consciouness.
- All DCS suspected cases should have initial treatment with high flow oxygen at 15ltr/min via a non-rebreathe mask or pocket masks regardless of their oxygen saturation levels.
- This high-flow 100% oxygen enhances nitrogen washout by widening the nitrogen pressure gradient between the lungs and the circulation, thus accelerating reabsorption of embolic bubbles. 
- An early oxygen first aid is important and may reduce symptoms substantially, but this should not change the recommended treatment plan.
- However, an initial oxygen breathing may clears the symptoms of air embolism and serious DCS, but they may reappear later due to which always contact DAN at +1-919-684-9111 or a dive physician in all the cases of suspected DCI, even if the symptoms and signs appear to have resolved. 
|Mild Symptoms: |
•Inhalation of oxygen with FiO2 1.0;
•Fluid administration (i.v. if possible,otherwise oral in unconscious patient)
|Severe Symptoms with pain, neurological and/or pulmonary impairment|
|Complete relief of symptoms within 30 minutes||Emergency treatment: |
•Flat supine position;
•CPR if necessary;
•Insufflation of 100% inspired Oxygen;
•Intubation when unconscious;
•HBOT as soon as possible
|If no||Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: |
•Treatment protocol most widespread: Table 6 USN;
•When intubated: paracentesis recommended;
•Lung ventilated at both sides?;
|Further drug therapy (scientifically not finally proven); |
•Corticosteroids, Aspirin, Lidocaine
|Further measures: |
•Early rehabilitation measures;
•Physiotherapeutic excercise between treatments
|Hospitalisation for 24h|
Figure 1: Treatment algorithm of Decompression Sickness (DCS)
- It is indicated to minimize the dehydration and restore lost intravascular volume.
- Oral resuscitation fluid (or plain water) is indicated for alert patients with mild manifestations.
- Isotonic IV fluid resuscitation and maintenance IV fluids should be administered to those with serious manifestations in order to counteract interstitial fluid shifts and decrease in plasma volume arising from an endothelial injury.
- Insert a catheter if there is any suspicion of the patient having urinary retention. 
Positioning and transportation
- The supine position or the recovery position should be preferred in case vomiting occurs.
- The Trendelenburg position and the left lateral decubitus position (Durant's maneuver) have beneficial effect in cases where air emboli are suspected; however, these positions are no longer recommended for prolonged duration due to concerns regarding cerebral edema. 
- It is essential that the suspected cases should be stabilized at the nearest medical center before transportation to a recompression chamber.
- However, patients with severe symptoms need an evacuation to a suitable recompression facility because time to treatment and severity of the injury are important determinants of outcome; and hence, transport should not be delayed for the performance of nonessential procedures.
- Instructions to fly the patient “as low as safely possible” should be given to helicopter transport.
- Pressurized aircraft with 1 atmosphere internal pressure is preferred.
- Unpressurized aircraft such as helicopters: The flight altitude should be limited to 300 m or 1000 ft if possible, and oxygen should be given continuously. 
- Commercial aircraft, although pressurized, typically have a cabin pressure equivalent to 2438 m (8000 ft) at normal cruise altitude, but it may precipitate DCS symptoms.  
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)
- The definitive treatment is hyperbaric oxygen (HBOT) therapy which delivers the pure 100% oxygen at a pressure substantially higher than that of atmospheric pressure in recompression chambers.
- Delays of > 4 hours from the time of injury to recompression correlate with a significant increase in the incidence of residual symptoms following therapy and hence, it should be initiated as soon as possible. 
- All the patients, except those whose symptoms are limited to itching, skin mottling, and fatigue, may be treated with oxygen therapy alone; however these patients should be observed for any kind of further deteriorating condition. 
Effects of Recompression therapy
- Bubble crushing: As per Boyles law, increasing pressure decreases the volume of bubbles.
- Flushing out the nitrogen bubbles with oxygen delivery by improving gradient.
- Healing damaged tissue with hyperbaric oxygen 
- Monoplace chamber: An acrylic tube sized chamber which have a capacity of one patient
- Multiplace chamber: It is sized to accommodate one or more patients with one or more technicians or other medical personnel. They are designed to allow patients, tenders or equipment to be transferred into and out of the chamber while treatment is ongoing.  
- A common HBOT regimen: The U.S. Navy Treatment Table 6 (USN 2008).
- Regimen protocol:
- HBOT chamber is brought to 2.8 atmospheres absolute (ATA), (equivalent of depth of 60 feet/18 meters) over a few minutes; and
- Then 100% FiO2 is initiated.
- 100% FiO2 is used for 20 minutes at a time, alternating with 5 minute intervals of room air breathing to reduce the risk of oxygen toxicity.
- Upon completion, the pressure is increased by no more than 1 foot/minute, with a prolonged period of equilibration at 30 feet.
- The total therapy time is about 5 hours.
- The therapy can be continued daily for several days until no further improvement is seen in the patient's symptoms.  
Mechanism of action
- The mechanism of HBOT is twofold.
- An elevated atmospheric pressure in the chamber increases the partial pressure of gases and dissolution of nitrogen back into liquid (Henry’s law), and the increased pressure also decreases the volume of gas present in the body (Boyle’s law).
- An increased FiO2 results in decreased partial pressure of nitrogen in inspired gas. This enhances the diffusion gradient of nitrogen out of body tissues, favoring exhalation and elimination from the body, and blunting the neutrophillic response to injured endothelium. 
- Middle ear barotrauma: most common adverse effect of HBOT; generally requires supportive care. Bilateral tympanostomy tubes may be required in severe cases.
- Pulmonary barotrauma: risk of pneumothorax; chest tube can be inserted.
- Pneumomediastinum: managed conservatively.
- Similar mechanism and management as barotrauma caused by diving.
- Oxygen toxicity:
- Pulmonary toxicity: small airways dysfunction observed on exceeding the treatment duration and pressure beyond the recommended therapeutic protocols.
- CNS toxicity: generalized tonic-clonic seizures occur with an incidence of approximately 1-4 per 10,000 patient treatments. Risk is higher in patients who are hypercapnic, acidemia and/or septic.
- Seizures: mechanisms not well-understood.
- CNS toxicity: managed by decreased FiO2 with same elevated atmospheric pressure.
- Ocular toxicity: myopia can be seen in those who undergo prolonged daily therapy.
- Confinement anxiety: Managed with anxiolytics.
- Fire: due to elevated FiO2.
In-water recompression (IWR) therapy
- It is beneficial only with a substantial amount of planning, support, equipment and personnel; appropriate water conditions; and suitable patient status.
- Critical challenges can arise from the changes in the patient's consciousness, oxygen toxicity, gas supply, and even thermal stress.
- An unsuccessful IWR may leave the patient in worse shape than had the attempt not been made.
- Hence, it would be suitable for an organized and disciplined group of divers with suitable equipment and practical training in the procedure.  
- Aspirin, NSAIDs, and corticosteroids have all been studied and shown no beneficial use in the management of DCS. However, they may mask the symptoms and exacerbate micro-haemorrhages caused by DCS resulting in a permanent sequelae.
- Opiates should also be avoided as they can increase the risk of oxygen toxicity.
- Oxygen is usually sufficient to control pain.  
Follow-up evaluation and return to diving
- Follow-up treatments along with physical therapy is required in the severe cases where significant residual neurological dysfunction may be present even after the most aggressive treatment.
- Clearing a diver after DCS to return to diving is a complex undertaking with potential medical and legal risks. A careful risk and benefit assessment to ensure that the diver is completely asymptomatic and back to his or her pre-dive baseline function must be conducted by both the diver and the physician. A referral of the patient to a diving medicine specialist is appropriate in case of improperly clearing a diver to return to diving keeping in mind the potential life-threatening implications. Divers should be instructed to refrain from diving for the remainder of their lives in the cases where the risks clearly outweigh the benefits. Furthermore, a diver who has had multiple bouts of DCS even if symptoms were not severe and resolves completely must take special considerations. In such cases, a Diving Medical Specialist must be consulted to determine if diving can be resumed safely.
- The physician must also consider when it is safe for a patient to fly home or drive at altitude. A retrospective review of 126 DCS cases demonstrated that those who flew home on commercial flights < 72 hours after recompression had a higher likelihood of recurrence of symptoms and signs of DCS. Similarly, physicians should be wary if patients must drive through high-altitude areas, as the drop in atmospheric pressure could, at least theoretically, potentiate a recurrence. 
- The US Navy has recommended the guidelines for returning to diving after treatment with limited time off for the professional divers as their operations should not get compromised; whereas diving is not a livelihood for the recreational divers, so a more conservative approach should be adopted to further minimize the chance for the recurrence of a diving injury. 
Table 6 elaborate the recommendations given by the US Navy for return to diving:
|Clinical features||Professional Divers||Recreational divers|
|Pain-only DCI with no neurological symptoms||May resume diving two to seven days after treatment||A minimum of two weeks without diving is recommended|
|Minor neurological symptoms||May resume diving two to four weeks after treatment depending on symptom severity||Six weeks without diving is recommended|
|Severe neurological symptoms or any residual symptoms||Must be reevaluated three months after treatment and get clearance from a Diving Medical Officer||No further diving is recommended|
Prognosis is severity dependent. It also depends upon on other factors such as the time to recompression, availability and time to surface oxygen, previous episode, and supportive care. 
- Avoided by limiting the depth and duration of dives to a range that does not need decompression stops during ascent (called no-stop limits) or by ascending with decompression stops as specified in published guidelines (eg, the decompression table in the US Navy Diving Manual).  
- Wearing a portable dive computer that continually tracks depth and time at depth and calculates a decompression schedule. Computer divers should be cautious in approaching no-decompression limits, especially when diving deeper than 100 feet (30 meters).
- Making a safety stop for a few minutes at about 4.6 m (15 ft) below the surface. 
- Recreational divers should dive conservatively, whether they are using dive tables or computers.
- Experienced divers often select a table depth (versus actual depth) of 10 feet (3 meters) deeper than called for by standard procedure. This practice is highly recommended for all divers, especially when diving in cold water or under strenuous conditions. 
- Avoiding the risk factors noted above (deep/long dives, exercise at depth or after a dive) will decrease the chance of DCS.
Altitude DCS: Things to remember
- Altitude DCS is a risk every time you fly in an un-pressurized aircraft above 18,000 feet (or at a lower altitude if you scuba dive prior to the flight).
- Be familiar with the signs and symptoms of altitude DCS. Monitor all aircraft occupants, including yourself, any time you fly an unpressurized aircraft above 18,000 feet.
- Avoid unnecessary strenuous physical activity prior to flying an un-pressurized aircraft above 18,000 feet, and for 24 h after the flight.
- Even if you are flying a pressurized aircraft, altitude DCS can occur as a result of a sudden loss of cabin pressure (in-flight rapid decompression).
- Put on your oxygen mask immediately and switch the regulator to 100% oxygen.
- Begin an emergency descent and land as soon as possible. Even if the symptoms disappear during descent, you should still land and seek medical evaluation while continuing to breathe oxygen.
- If one of your symptoms is joint pain, keep the affected area still; do not try to work the pain out by moving the joint around.
- After exposure to an in-flight rapid decompression, do not fly for at least 24 h. In the meantime, stay vigilant for the possible onset of delayed symptoms or signs of altitude DCS. If you present delayed symptoms or signs of altitude DCS, seek medical attention at once.
- Keep in mind that breathing 100% oxygen during flight (ascent, en route, descent) without oxygen pre-breathing before take-off does not prevent altitude DCS.
- Do not ignore any symptoms or signs that go away during the descent. This could confirm that you are suffering altitude DCS. You should be medically evaluated from an aviation authority medical officer, aviation medical examiner (AME), military flight surgeon, or a hyperbaric medicine specialist. Be aware that a physician not specialized in aviation or hypobaric medicine may not be familiar with this type of medical problem. Therefore, be your own advocate.
- If there is any indication that you may have experienced altitude DCS, do not fly again until you are cleared to do so.
- Allow at least 24 hours to elapse between scuba diving and flying.
- Be prepared for a future emergency by finding where hyperbaric chambers are available in your area of operations. However, keep in mind that not all of the available hyperbaric treatment facilities have personnel qualified to handle altitude DCS emergencies. To obtain information on the locations of hyperbaric treatment facilities capable of handling altitude DCS emergencies, call the Diver's Alert Network at (USA phone number) (919) 684-9111.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
- Divers Alert Network: www.diversalertnetwork.org 24-hour emergency hotline, 919-684-9111
- Duke Dive Medicine: www.dukedivemedicine.org Physician-to-physician consultation, 919-684-8111
- Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society
- US Navy Diving Manual
Decompression sickness in popular culture
- In the 1880s, DCS became known as The Bends because afflicted individuals characteristically arched their backs in a manner reminiscent of a then-popular women's fashion called the Grecian Bend.
- A diver with DCS flying in an aircraft was part of the plot in the episode Airborne of House, M.D., first aired Tuesday April 11, 2007.
- Rock band Radiohead released an album entitled The Bends, a reference to DCS.
- DCS played a part in the anime visual novel "Ever 17"
- A character in the series "Dive" by Gordan Korman experiences a case of DCS.
- In an episode of "Jackie Chan Adventures" titled Clash of the Titanics, Jackie experienced DCS.
- Roger Bochs, a character in the Marvel Comics series Alpha Flight, experiences DCS after battling alongside the Avengers in Atlantis.
- Acott, C. (1999). "A brief history of diving and decompression illness". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 29 (2). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801
- Hill, L (1912). Caisson sickness, and the physiology of work in compressed air. London E. Arnold
- Huggins, Karl E. (1992). "Dynamics of decompression workshop". Course Taught at the University of Michigan. ; Huggins 1992, chpt. 1 page 8
- Trucco, Jean-Noël; Biard, Jef; Redureau, Jean-Yves; Fauvel, Yvon (3 May 1999). "Table Marine National 90 (MN90): Version du 03/05/1999" (PDF). Comité interrégional Bretagne & Pays de la Loire; Commission Technique Régionale. (in French). F.F.E.S.S.M.
- Butler WP (2004). "Caisson disease during the construction of the Eads and Brooklyn Bridges: A review". Undersea Hyperb Med. 31 (4): 445–59. PMID 15686275.
- Bert, P. (1878). "Barometric Pressure: researches in experimental physiology". Translated By: Hitchcock MA and Hitchcock FA. College Book Company; 1943
- John L. Phillips, The Bends: Compressed Air in the History of Science, Diving, and Engineering, Yale University Press (1998) - Google Books p 103
- Moon, Richard (March 2000). "The Natural Progression of Decompression Illness and Development of Recompression Procedures" (PDF). SPUMS Journal. 30 (1): 39
- Boycott AE, Damant GC, Haldane JS (1908). "The Prevention of Compressed-air Illness". J Hyg (Lond). 8 (3): 342–443. doi:10.1017/s0022172400003399. PMC 2167126. PMID 20474365.
- Stillson, GD (1915). "Report in Deep Diving Tests". US Bureau of Construction and Repair, Navy Department. Technical Report
- Golding FC , Griffi ths P , Hempleman HV , Paton WDM , Walder DN . Decompression sickness during construction of the Dartford tunnel . Br J Ind Med 1960 ; 17 : 167 – 80
- Brubakk, Alf (2003). Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving. Edinburgh New York: Saunders. ISBN 978-0-7020-2571-6.
- Francis, T James R; Smith, DJ (1991). "Describing Decompression Illness". 42nd Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Workshop. 79(DECO)5–15–91.
- Edmonds, Lowry, Pennefather, Walker. Diving and Subaquatic Medicine 4th edition Arnold 2002
- Gorman, Des. Accidental arterial gas embolism. Emergency Medicine. 14(4):364-370, December 2002
- NHS Commissioning Board. April 2013. Clinical Commissioning Policy: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
- Kindwall E and Whelan H, Hyperbaric Medicine Practice, 3rd Edition (2008), Chapter 4 page 71-89
- Powell, Mark (2008). Deco for divers : a diver's guide to decompression theory and physiology. Southend-on-Sea, Essex: AquaPress. ISBN 978-1-905492-07-7.
- U.S. Navy Supervisor of Diving (2008). U.S. Navy Diving Manual (PDF). SS521-AG-PRO-010, revision 6. vol.5. U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command. pp. 20–25
- TDI Decompression Procedures Manual (Rev 1c), page 38
- Frans Cronje (5 August 2014). All That Tingles Is Not Bends (video). DAN Southern Africa
- "Decompression Sickness - Injuries; Poisoning - MSD Manual Professional Edition".
- Moon, Richard E (1998). "Assessment of patients with decompression illness". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 28 (1).
- Richard D Vann, Frank K Butler, Simon J Mitchell, Richard E Moon. Decompression illness. Vol 377 January 8, 2011; pg: 153-164
- Klingmann C, Praetorius M, Baumann I, Plinkert PK. Barotrauma and decompression illness of the inner ear: 46 cases during treatment and follow-up. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 447–54
- Farmer JC Jr. Diving injuries to the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1977; 86 (1 Pt 3 suppl 36): 1–20
- Molvaer OI, Eidsvik S. Facial baroparesis: a review. Undersea Biomed Res 1987; 14: 277–95
- Butler FK, Bove AA. Infraorbital hypesthesia after maxillary sinus barotrauma. Undersea Hyperb Med 1999; 26: 257–59
- Eastaugh J, Shepherd S. Infectious and toxic syndromes from fi sh and shellfi sh consumption. A review. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1735–40
- Adir Y, Shupak A, Gil A, Peled N, et al. Swimming-induced pulmonary edema: clinical presentation and serial lung function. Chest 2004; 126: 394–99
- Pollock, Neal W.; Buteau, Dominique (2017). "Updates in Decompression Illness". Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 35 (2): 301–319. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2016.12.002. ISSN 0733-8627.
- DeNoble, PJ; Vann, RD; Pollock, NW; Uguccioni, DM; Freiberger, JJ; Pieper, CF (2005). "A case-control study of decompression sickness (DCS) and arterial gas embolism (AGE)". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society
- DeHart, Roy (2002). Fundamentals of aerospace medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-0-7817-2898-0.
- Bassett, Bruce E (1982). "Decompression Procedures for Flying After Diving, and Diving at Altitudes above Sea Level". US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine Technical Report. SAM-TR-82-47
- Lippmann, John (2005). Deeper into diving : an in-depth review of decompression procedures, and of the physical and physiological aspects of deeper diving. Melbourne Australia: J.L. Publications. ISBN 978-0-9752290-1-9.
- Fryer, David (1969). Subatmospheric decompression sickness in man. London: Technical P. ISBN 978-0-85102-023-5.
- Gerth, Wayne A; Ruterbusch, VL; Long, Edward T (2007). "The Influence of Thermal Exposure on Diver Susceptibility to Decompression Sickness". United States Navy Experimental Diving Unit Technical Report. NEDU-TR-06-07
- Moon, Richard E; Kisslo, Joseph (1998). "PFO and decompression illness: An update". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 28 (3). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801
- Karlsson, L; Linnarson, D; Gennser, M; Blogg, SL; Lindholm, Peter (2007). "A case of high doppler scores during altitude decompression in a subject with a fractured arm". Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 34 (Supplement). ISSN 1066-2936. OCLC 26915585
- Boycott, A. E.; Damant, G. C. C. (2009). "Experiments on the Influence of Fatness on Susceptibility to Caisson Disease". Epidemiology and Infection. 8 (4): 445–456. doi:10.1017/S0022172400015862. ISSN 0950-2688.
- "RSA Abstracts". Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 29: 6A–172A. 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2005.tb03524.x. ISSN 0145-6008.
- Freiberger JJ, Lyman SJ, Denoble PJ, et al. Consensus factors used by experts in the diagnosis of decompression illness. Aviat Space Environ Med 2004;75(12): 1023–8
- Benson J, Adkinson C, Collier R. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy of iatrogenic cerebral arterial gas embolism. Undersea Hyperb Med 2003; 30: 117–26
- Gempp E, Blatteau JE, Stephant E, Pontier JM, Constantin P, Peny C. MRI fi ndings and clinical outcome in 45 divers with spinal cord decompression sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 2008; 79: 1112–16
- Gempp E, Blatteau JE, Pontier JM, Balestra C, Louge P. Preventive eff ect of pre-dive hydration on bubble formation in divers. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 224–28
- Tetzlaff, Kay; Shank, Erik S.; Muth, Claus M. (2003). "Evaluation and management of decompression illness—an intensivist's perspective". Intensive Care Medicine. 29 (12): 2128–2136. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1999-1. ISSN 0342-4642.
- "Decompression Sickness (DCS, Bends, Caisson Disease) - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf".
- "Decompression Illness - RCEMLearning".
- Kindwall, EP; Goldmann, RW; Thombs, PA (1988). "Use of the Monoplace vs. Multiplace Chamber in the Treatment of Diving Diseases". Journal of Hyperbaric Medicine; 3(1). Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc. pp. 5–10
- U.S. Navy Supervisor of Diving (2008). "Chapter 20: Diagnosis and Treatment of Decompression Sickness and Arterial Gas Embolism". U.S. Navy Diving Manual (PDF). SS521-AG-PRO-010, revision 6. volume 5. U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command. p. 41
- Heyboer, Marvin; Sharma, Deepali; Santiago, William; McCulloch, Norman (2017). "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: Side Effects Defined and Quantified". Advances in Wound Care. 6 (6): 210–224. doi:10.1089/wound.2016.0718. ISSN 2162-1918.
- "Decompression Illness: What Is It and What Is The Treatment? — DAN | Divers Alert Network — Medical Dive Article".
- Decompression Sickness: Prevention, Risks, Exercise, PFO, References, Links* What causes the bends?* Whales Suffer From Bends* UK Sport Diving Medical Committee: Bone Necrosis* Divers Alert Network: diving medicine articles* Dive Tables from the NOAATemplate:Consequences of external causescs:Dekompresní nemocda:Trykfaldssygede:Dekompressionserkrankungit:Malattia da decompressionehu:Keszon-betegségnl:Caissonziektefi:Sukeltajantautisv:Tryckfallssjukauk:Кесонна хворобаTemplate:WikiDoc Sources