Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Colon polyps Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Colon polyps from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Guidelines for Management

Case Studies

Case #1

Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice

CDC on Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice

Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice in the news

Blogs on Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice

Directions to Hospitals Treating Colon polyps

Risk calculators and risk factors for Colon polyps diagnostic study of choice

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]

Overview

Colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy are diagnostic studies of choice to diagnose colon polyps.

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Gold standard

  • There are two gold standard tests for the diagnosis of colon polyps include:[1][2][3][4]
    • Colonoscopy
      • Sensitivity of colonoscopy to detect polyps is 85-90%.
      • False negative rate for colonoscopy not to detect polyps of all sizes is 22%. However, false negative rate would be lower if the adenoma is larger.
    • Flexible sigmoidoscopy

References

  1. Arnesen, R. B.; Ginnerup-Pedersen, B.; Poulsen, P. B.; von Benzon, E.; Adamsen, S.; Laurberg, S.; Hart-Hansen, O. (2016). "Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography: a prospective comparison with colonoscopy". Acta Radiologica. 48 (3): 259–266. doi:10.1080/02841850601182139. ISSN 0284-1851.
  2. O'Brien, Michael J. (2007). "Hyperplastic and Serrated Polyps of the Colorectum". Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 36 (4): 947–968. doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2007.08.007. ISSN 0889-8553.
  3. Moreno, Courtney C.; Mittal, Pardeep K.; Henson, Nicholas L.; Baumgarten, Deborah A.; Alexander, Lauren F.; Hanes, Timothy S.; Small, William C.; Kitajima, Hiroumi D.; Kang, Jian; Votaw, John R.; Oshinski, John N.; Dixon, W. Thomas (2014). "Optimal section thickness for detection of polyps at MR: resolution phantom study". Abdominal Imaging. 40 (6): 1451–1456. doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0331-6. ISSN 0942-8925.
  4. Shussman, N.; Wexner, S. D. (2014). "Colorectal polyps and polyposis syndromes". Gastroenterology Report. 2 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1093/gastro/got041. ISSN 2052-0034.

​ ​